DOJ PRs/links on CMKM

[Duc N Altum]

www.usdoj.gov/usao/nv/press/september2009/cmkm09212009.htm

NEWS RELEASE
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2009 PRESS CONTACTS:
Natalie Collins, Public Affairs Specialist

[phone]


FIVE PERSONS ARRESTED IN SECURITIES FRAUD CASE
Investors Lost Over $60 Million in Stock Scheme
LAS VEGAS - - Five persons, including three Las Vegans and a lawyer licensed to practice in Nevada, have been arrested and charged with federal conspiracy and securities fraud crimes for issuing and selling hundreds of billions of shares of unregistered stock, announced Greg Brower, United States Attorney for the District of Nevada.

Helen Bagley, 62; Ginger Gutierrez, 37; and James Kinney, 39, all of Las Vegas; and Brian Dvorak, 54, of Boulder City, Colorado, were arrested on September 16 and September 17 in their respective cities of residence. Another defendant was arrested in England earlier this month and the U.S. Department of Justice has requested his extradition. A sixth defendant remains at large. Defendants Bagley, Gutierrez, and Kinney made initial appearances on Thursday, September 17, 2009, before U.S. Magistrate Judge George W. Foley, Jr. and were released pending trial. Defendant Dvorak appeared on September 17, 2009, before a U.S. Magistrate Judge in Denver, Colorado, and was released pending trial.

The defendants are charged in a Superseding Indictment, which was returned by the Federal Grand Jury in Las Vegas on May 27, 2009, but remained sealed until Thursday, September 17, 2009. All of the defendants are charged with one count of Conspiracy to Sell Unregistered Securities, to Make False Statements to the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), to Desist From Filing Periodic Reports, and to Commit Securities Fraud; two counts of Securities Fraud; and one count of Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud. Defendants Gutierrez, Kinney, and two others are also charged with Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering.

The Superseding Indictment alleges that from about September 2001 to March 2009, the defendants conspired to sell unregistered stock and stock certificates of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.(CMKM) by using the mails, wire services, over the counter stock exchanges, and other means of interstate commerce. The defendants also are alleged to have used manipulative and deceptive devices to sell CMKM stock and stock certificates.

The scheme allegedly began in September 2001 when one of the conspirators gained control of a publicly traded corporate shell, then known as Cyber Mark. Incorporated in Delaware, Cyber Mark had at one time been a software company. However, by 2001 the business was defunct and had no appreciable assets or revenue. This corporate shell nonetheless remained registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and eligible to publicly trade its stock. In April 2002, Cyber Mark reorganized as a Nevada corporation and filed Articles of Conversion with the Secretary of State of Nevada absorbing the earlier Delaware corporation. At the time of its incorporation in Nevada, this corporate shell was authorized to issue up to five hundred million shares of common stock of which over three hundred million had been issued and were outstanding.

In November 2002, Cyber Mark entered into an agreement to purchase mining claims or interests held by five companies owned or controlled by Casavant and his family, ostensibly in exchange for two million dollars and approximately three billion shares of Cyber Mark restricted common stock notwithstanding that this corporate shell had no appreciable assets, revenue or value. Cyber Mark contemporaneously filed an Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation increasing its authorized common shares to ten billion four hundred ninety-seven million. Although Cyber Mark did not merge with Casavant's companies, Casavant became director, president and chief executive officer of Cyber Mark. On December 3, 2002, Cyber Mark changed its corporate name to Casavant Mining Kimberlite International. In February 2004, the company took the name CMKM Diamonds, Inc.

As a publicly traded corporation, CMKM was required to file quarterly and annual reports with the SEC. These reporting requirements are intended to provide the investing public with current and accurate information to enable investors to make informed decisions. However, CMKM did not file quarterly reports between October 2002 and June 2005, nor did it file annual reports for calendar years 2002, 2003 and 2004. By evading statutory and regulatory reporting requirements in this manner, the conspirators concealed information regarding CMKM's assets, liabilities, operations, revenues, and shares from both government regulators and the investing public. Having effectively cast a cloak of secrecy over the corporation, the conspirators increased CMKM's authorized shares from ten billion four hundred ninety-seven million to an estimated eight hundred billion shares through a series of amendments to CMKM’s Articles of Incorporation between December 2002 and August 2004.

Bagley, doing business as 1st Global Stock Transfer LLC, thereafter issued hundreds of billions of shares of CMKM stock to the conspirators’ nominees, alter-egos associates and straw-purchasers. Most of these shares of CMKM stock were not registered with the SEC and the share certificates should have borne restrictive legends declaring that the shares were un registered and could not be sold to the public. However, as part of the conspiracy, Dvorak issued opinion letters falsely and fraudulently invoking invoke an exemption from the rules and regulations that restricting the sale of unregistered stock. Specifically, the conspirators invoked SEC Rule 144(k) by falsely representing that the nominees and straw-purchasers had purchased or earned billions of shares of CMKM stock more than two years earlier and that those shares had mistakenly not been issued at that time. In this manner, the conspirators fraudulently issued hundreds of billions of unregistered shares of CMKM stock without restrictive legends. Bagley issued sheaves of unlegended stock certificates representing hundreds of billions of shares of CMKM stock to nominees, alter-egos, associates and straw-purchasers.

Despite issuing approximately eight hundred billion (800,000,000,000) shares of stock, CMKM remained a hollow shell. Although purporting to be an international diamond exploration and mining company, CMKM did not conduct substantive mining operations and did not produce any diamonds. Although CMKM was not engaged in any productive mining activities or business of any kind (other than issuing its own stock), the conspirators created a market and stoked demand for CMKM stock. To create the appearance of an active and established market for CMKM stock, and to disguise the fact that they were the primary sellers of CMKM stock, the conspirators surreptitiously traded in CMKM stock through multiple nominees, alter-egos, associates and straw-purchasers. The volume of the trading activity generated by the conspirators sparked investor interest in CMKM. The conspirators spurred interest in CMKM's stock by sponsoring motor sports racing teams and Internet promotions. Further, in the void created by CMKM's failure to file periodic reports, the conspirators sowed misinformation regarding CMKM's activities and spurred speculation regarding the company’s prospects and value through false and misleading press releases and market manipulation.

Fueled by the fraudulent promotions and a seemingly endless supply of CMKM stock, the conspirators sold hundreds of billions of CMKM stock to the investing public. Although CMKM shares usually traded at less than a penny per share, the sub-penny price was offset by the astounding volume of shares traded. Indeed, records reflect that during the course of the fraudulent scheme approximately 40,000 investors purchased CMKM stock in market transactions and that trading volume frequently exceeded one billion shares—and sometimes two billion shares—per day. In March 2005, the SEC suspended CMKM's trading status, and in October 2005, the SEC ordered CMKM deregistered. The indictment alleges that before the scheme was brought to an end, the defendants realized more than sixty million dollars through the fraudulent sale of CMKM stock. Kinney, Gutierrez and two others are charged with conspiracy to launder the proceeds of the criminal scheme.

If convicted, the defendants face up to 5 years in prison for conspiracy to commit securities offenses as charged in Count One; up to 10 years in prison for securities fraud in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 78j, as charged in Count Two; up to 25 years in prison for committing, or for conspiring to commit, securities fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1348, as charged in Counts Three and Four; and up to 20 years in prison for conspiracy to commit money laundering, as charged in Count Five. Defendants are also subject to potential fines and the indictment seeks the forfeiture of up to $60 million from the defendants if they are convicted.

This case is being investigated by the FBI and IRS Criminal Investigation. The SEC also previously brought civil enforcement actions in this matter. The criminal case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Timothy S. Vasquez and Michael Chu.

The public is reminded that an indictment contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

[Duc N Altum]

(2:44 PM) wilso1936: Chas5678: jarta-just spoke to Deborah Waite at the DOJ Victims program.There will be a link on the CMKM Diamonds Inc website..to link shareholders to their website for all information. Should be up by tomorrow.

[sandi66]

“THE REALITIES of RESTITUTION
FOR VICTIMS of FEDERAL CRIMES”
Most crime victims are very concerned about how they can recover from their financial loss
suffered as a result of a crime. This information is provided to you by the U.S. Attorney’s Office
for the District of Nevada. The following is meant to provide a brief overview for federal crime
victims and restitution ordered by the court, the legal process involved, and the realities of
actually receiving full restitution.
The Justice for All Act of 2004 provides that “identified” federal crime victims are entitled to full
and timely restitution as provided by law for certain losses suffered as a result of the commission
of an offense as part of the criminal sentence imposed on the defendant, or as part of a plea
agreement. Federal crime victims may be either individuals, businesses, or corporations.
Definition of a Federal Crime Victim
A federal crime victim is “a person directly or proximately harmed as a result of the commission
of a federal offense, or an offense within the District of Columbia 18 U.S.C. ss 3771(e).
The issue of receiving restitution is important to all victims, to include victims of financial
crimes. It is often not possible to immediately project or determine the exact amount of loss that
a defendant has caused which can be applicable to court-ordered restitution. Cases that have a
large number of victims and that are complex in nature, such as scams, often take a very long
time to reach a final court disposition. Unfortunately, the amount of total restitution ultimately
received by a victim in many cases ranges from zero percent to only a very small percent of the
total amount a victim has lost. If any proceeds are identified by the court which can be applied
toward restitution, payments to victims may be made by a defendant or defendants over a period
of several years. The U.S. Attorney’s Office pursues restitution payments for up to twenty years
after a defendant is sentenced. Therefore, it is important that victims keep the U.S. Attorney’s
Office or the Court Clerk’s office informed of any name and/or address changes.
What you can do as a crime victim?
Provide all receipts or other verification of your loss where ever possible. It is important to
obtain all records of all expenses or loss incurred as a result of the crime. This information will
be used in determining what costs may be court ordered in the form of restitution to the victim if
a defendant is convicted.
Ordering vs. Receiving Restitution
Under federal law, it is mandatory for a defendant to pay restitution when there is a loss to the
victim. Unfortunately, as a practical matter, a defendant who has no money or potential to make
money in the future, may be unlikely to ever make meaningful restitution to the victims of a
crime.
Court-ordered restitution is limited to specific losses and may not allow any monetary
compensation for a victim’s pain and suffering.
Restitution for Financial Loss
In most fraud cases, restitution may be ordered where victims of the convicted federal offense
have suffered the loss of money, in such crimes as investor fraud, mortgage fraud, telemarketing
scams, or offenses involving the misuse of bank accounts or credit cards. The court may order a
defendant to pay an amount equal to each victim's actual loss, which is commonly the value of
the principle or property which was fraudulently obtained.
How Does a Victim Begin Receiving Restitution?
The U. S. Attorney's Office, Financial Litigation Unit (FLU) is charged with enforcing orders of
restitution, and monitors efforts in enforcing a Judgment if defendant’s assets or income are
identified.
The Financial Litigation Unit will pursue various means to enforce restitution, as its resources
permit, on behalf of identified victims, for a time period of up to 20 years from the filing date of
the defendant’s Sentencing Judgment, which includes the time period of the defendant’s actual
incarceration, or until the death of the defendant. In addition, once a defendant/inmate is released
from prison, and is then under the supervision of the U.S. Probation Office, restitution will be
monitored to insure appropriate restitution is paid, where possible.
Can Victims File a Lien Against the Defendant?
A victim may also choose to request the U. S. Clerk of the Court to issue an Abstract of
Judgment certifying that a judgment has been entered in a victim's favor in the amount specified
in the Judgment. A victim may then file this with the Recorder's Office for any county in which it
is believed the defendant had assets, in the state in which a defendant was convicted in federal
court. Upon its recording, the Abstract of Judgment becomes a lien upon the property of the
defendant in that county/state in the same manner as a state court judgment. Victims should
consult with a private attorney for specific information on this option.
Additional Restitution Provisions
An order of restitution is not dischargeable in bankruptcy. It also is not a guarantee that a crime
victim will actually receive the money ordered by the court.
After a Judge has imposed a restitution order, the U. S. Attorney or an identified victim may later
make a motion to the court if they discover a material change in the defendant's economic
circumstances that affect his or her ability to pay restitution. Victims with such information
should contact the U. S. Attorney's Office’s Financial Litigation Unit.
Other Available Remedies
A federal crime victim may wish to file a civil action or file in small claims court against a
defendant to recoup losses caused by the crime. The U.S. Attorney’s Office cannot provide legal
advice or services in that matter, however, the crime victim may choose to consult with a private
attorney, or the Small Claims Court in the county in which the crime occurred. There is usually a
statute of limitations which limits the time in which a civil suit can be filed.
What If I Expect Damages from a Civil Suit, or Receive Compensation from Other Sources?
If a victim has received compensation from insurance, disability, the state Crime Victims'
Compensation Fund, or any other source with respect to a loss, the court shall order that
restitution be paid to the person/company who provided or is obligated to provide the
compensation. However, the restitution order shall provide that all restitution is payable to actual
victims first.
Common Emotional and Physical Aspects Resulting from Financial Victimization
More often than not, a victim of financial fraud, investment scam, or embezzlement will
experience many emotions. A crime victim often experiences anger due to the betrayal of
someone or some thing they put their trust and judgement in, along with their lost finances.
Victims often feel frustration as a common response to their financial loss. Additional
experiences a victim may have include :
guilt for not being more skeptical of the concept or promises of the investment
disbelief that they were drawn into and fooled by such a sham
difficulty accepting the fact that their financial loss has radically changed their life plan,
especially when they are retired and their life plans have been dramatically altered
health problems related to stress, such as insomnia, inability to eat or concentrate,
develop low self-esteem or depression
Over time, many crime victims work through these difficulties on their own, or seek outside
resources or counseling for assistance.

www.usdoj.gov/usao/nv/victim_witness/cmkm/restitution_information.pdf

[sandi66]

Case Updates
US v. John Edwards et al (CMKM)

Scheduled Court Hearings

On October 2, 2009, Brian Dvorak entered his plea of not quilty and John Wesley Hall was appointed as his attorney. Defendant Dvorak will have a status hearing on November 16, 2009 and trial is set for November 16, 2009.

Status Hearing - Nov. 12, 2009 @ 8:45

Trial Date - Nov. 16, 2009 @ 8:30

(These dates will change because this case will be designated as a complex case.)

Victim Letter

Press Release

Indictment

Restitution Information

Click here for the questionnaire.

www.usdoj.gov/usao/nv/victim_witness/case_updates.html

[sandi66]

Questionnaire:

Attention: The information solicited in this form is being collected as part of an ongoing federal investigation and criminal prosecution within the jurisdiction of the United States Department of Justice. Materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations may constitute a felony in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001. Responses, although welcomed, will not increase the likelihood of any restitution.

Today's Date

First Name *

Last Name *

Address*

State*
--Select a State-- Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
Country *



Telephone number where you can be reached *
() -


Alternative telephone number where you can be reached
() -



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email address *



If you have ever spoken with the following persons, please check all boxes that apply:

John M. Edwards
Urban Casavant
Ginger Gutierrez
James Kinney
Helen Bagley
Brian Dvorak



Did you purchase CMKM shares? *
Yes
No



If yes, please answer the following questions:



How many shares do you currently own?


Certificate number(s) of the shares you currently own:


At the time you purchased your shares, how did you learn of CMKM? Please check all boxes that apply:

Internet forum/chat room
Attended promotional event
Learned from friends
Learned from family members
Received solicitation
Other (25 words maximum)





When did you purchase your shares?
--Select a Month-- January February March April May June July August September October November December --Select a Year-- 1999 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

How did you purchase your shares? (25 words maximum)


In total, how much money did you pay for your shares?


Did you sell any shares or recover any money?
Yes
No

If you sold any of your shares, how many shares did you sell?


If you sold any of your shares, how much did you receive?




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please summarize in your own words how you have been victimized in the space allotted below. You may also provide any additional information that you would like to bring to our attention. (400 words maximum)




If you believe you have evidence that shows that the defendants are innocent, please check the box below:

John M. Edwards
Urban Casavant
Ginger Gutierrez
James Kinney
Helen Bagley
Brian Dvorak



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I affirm that my responses are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that providing false information could subject me to the penalties of perjury under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001. *


www.usdoj.gov/usao/nv/questions.html

[sandi66]

Case Updates
US v. John Edwards et al (CMKM)

Scheduled Court Hearings

On October 2, 2009, Brian Dvorak entered his plea of not quilty and John Wesley Hall was appointed as his attorney. Defendant Dvorak will have a status hearing on November 16, 2009 and trial is set for November 16, 2009.

Status Hearing - Nov. 12, 2009 @ 8:45

Trial Date - Nov. 16, 2009 @ 8:30

(These dates will change because this case will be designated as a complex case.)

Victim Letter

Press Release

Indictment

Restitution Information

The questionnaire is being modified. Please check again.The


www.usdoj.gov/usao/nv/victim_witness/case_updates.html


ty leowanta

[sandi66]

www.usdoj.gov/usao/nv/victim_witness/case_updates.html
Case Updates
US v. John Edwards et al (CMKM)

Scheduled Court Hearings

On October 2, 2009, Brian Dvorak entered his plea of not quilty and John Wesley Hall was appointed as his attorney. Defendant Dvorak will have a status hearing on November 16, 2009 and trial is set for November 16, 2009.

Status Hearing - Nov. 12, 2009 @ 8:45

Trial Date - Nov. 16, 2009 @ 8:30

(These dates will change because this case will be designated as a complex case.)

Victim Letter

Press Release

Indictment

Restitution Information

The questionnaire is being modified. Please check again.The questionnaire is being modified. Please check again.

[Duc N Altum]

*ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF CMKM TRIAL DATE* Filed 10/27/09


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.justice.gov/usao/nv/victim_wi....rial%20date.pdf ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE ... Trial Date - Feb. 7, 2011 @ 8:30

if you have problems pulling that up, use the tinyurl
tinyurl.com/ykvxyjs

Case Updates
INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE FOR FEDERAL CRIME VICTIMS AND WITNESSES BROCHURE (Click here to view and print.)

US v. John Edwards et al (CMKM)

Scheduled Court Hearings

ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE

Status Hearing - Feb. 2, 2011 @ 8:45

Trial Date - Feb. 7, 2011 @ 8:30



Victim Letter

Press Release

Indictment

Restitution Information

The questionnaire is being modified. Please check again.The


Sandi

[sandi66]

www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/notice_emergency_motion_12-3-09.pdf

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
SHORTENING TIME REGARDIN(]
EMERGENCY MOTION TO
ASSOCIATE COUNSEL ON AN
ORDER SHORTENING TIME
Date: December I0.2009
Time: 9:00 a.m.

Roger Glenn, Defendant

[sandi66]

www.cmkmdiamondsinc.com/documents/cmkm_filed_brief_12-8-09.pdf

Documents:
CMKM Filed Brief 12-8-09

Plaintiff CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Brief in Support of Order to Show Cause to Turn Over Funds

Hearing Date: January 5, 2010
Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m.

[sandi66]

Case Updates
The public is reminded that an indictment contains only charges and is not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
US v. John Edwards et al (CMKM)
Scheduled Court Hearings
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE
Status Hearing - Feb. 2, 2011 @ 8:45
Trial Date - Feb. 7, 2011 @ 8:30

Victim Letter
INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE FOR FEDERAL CRIME VICTIMS AND WITNESSES BROCHURE (Click here to view and print.)
Press Release
Superseding Indictment
Restitution Information
The superseding indictment in United States v. Edwards, et al., alleges as follows: the defendants combined and conspired to perpetrate a fraud involving the issuance and sale of CMKM stock over a period of several years. Hundreds of billions of shares of CMKM stock were sold to thousands of investors during that span. Investors in CMKM are invited (but not required) to complete the following questionnaire. The questionnaire solicits information pertaining to this case for purposes of enabling prosecutors to confer with and receive information and opinions from victims of the CMKM scheme. Please note that while the completed questionnaires will not be publicly accessible, relevant information may be disclosed to the court and/or defense counsel in accordance with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and other laws.

www.justice.gov/usao/nv/victim_witness/case_updates.html

[sandi66]

viewer.zoho.com/docs/qzwdc

Case 2:09-cr-00132-RLH-RJJ Document 63 Filed 03/24/10

[sandi66]

Re: Mr. Casavant charged with RICO
« Reply #6 Yesterday at 5:49pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually its not a repeat. The first didn't have this portion included...so this should stay.

Didn't someone say Urban would look REAL bad right before the end? Not suggesting this is, in fact, the end...but he does look real bad here.

Mox nix. There are two battles I see; one Hodges is waging, the other is being lead by Tyler. I'm hoping Hodges gets his done now...and we wait for this one later.


pr

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=31235&page=1

[sandi66]

Re: Mr. Casavant charged with RICO
« Reply #9 Yesterday at 5:54pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
marygrace... "best news" Kinda hypocritical to want to enrich Yourself, on the back of the man who "may" have made it possible for YOU to participate in the stock play of a lifetime. BTW, if YOU have these feelings fine, that's your choice in a free country; however, most of the rest of us don't share your view about seeing UC beaten down any more, than he already has been. And, while I'm NOT a Securities Attorney (or even an attorney at all)... I see nowhere in these documents where RICO is "Charged". It's always been my understanding that formal RICO charges need to occur, not be conjured up in the mind of the reader(s). I also saw nothing anywhere in the official documents where Urban's name appeared, like the "paste-in" shows either. My interpretation of the document was (from a formerly sealed grand jury finding) for Indictment UNsealed adding Turino-Spooner-Jeff Mitchell and Nickolaj Vissokovsky... PERIOD??? Des'

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=31235&page=1

[sandi66]

Re: Mr. Casavant charged with RICO
« Reply #10 Yesterday at 5:59pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not bad points, Des. You know we were talking about this earlier today (couple buds) and there is just no way I see them leaving UC out of the loop during the entrapment side of a sting. It seems to me you just have to leave the head of the company in there, lest those who did the ns-ing wouldn't take the pump/dump bait. So hopefully you're right...he's listed as means of carrying out the whole "plam" and when it comes time for charging/convicting, he is exonerated.

Either way, we're all getting impatient!


pr

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=31235&page=1

[luckieeguy]

May 6, 2010 15:44:50 GMT -5 sandi66 said:

viewer.zoho.com/docs/qzwdc

Case 2:09-cr-00132-RLH-RJJ Document 63 Filed 03/24/10

By DUC

File Name: Duc Urban Bomb 51010.mp3

www.zshare.net/download/7594340110851f1d/

An MP3 on Urban Casavant / RICO.

[sandi66]

www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/claims/cmkmsupersedingindictment.pdf

sarge_66: www.sec.gov/news/whatsnew/wn-today.shtml Click on the W Financial Group, LLC, et al (SEC v. W Financial Group, LLC, et al, Case 2:09-cr-00132-RLH-RJJ)

Notice what comes up when you click on the SEC link!!!

Sealed document all about CMKX


ty allrich


What's New on the SEC Website May 14, 2010
sarge_66: www.sec.gov/news/whatsnew/wn-today.shtml

click on this link... and then open the W Financial Group, LLC, et al (SEC v. W Financial Group, LLC, et al, Case 2:09-cr-00132-RLH-RJJ)


That is our case with DOJ


www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2008/lr20515.htm
Vernon T. Jones, Jr., as Receiver for W Financial Group, LLC, files this Original Complaint against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,

Remember... posted earlier this month...
Re: DOJ PRs/links on CMKM
« Reply #11 on May 6, 2010, 3:44pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
viewer.zoho.com/docs/qzwdc

Case 2:09-cr-00132-RLH-RJJ Document 63 Filed 03/24/10

[sandi66]

www.scribd.com/doc/49884141/Gutierrez-Ginger-Reply-to-Govt-Show-temp-1

Gutierrez, Giner Reply to Government's Response


51 pages Case 2:09-cr-00132-RLH -RJJ Document 136 Filed 02/26/11



ty kyle

[sandi66]

ORDERED that this case is hereby referred to Magistrate George W. Foley for the scheduling of a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 4/22/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) (Entered: 04/25/2011)



this information obtained by jacbert's room

[sandi66]

US v. John Edwards et al (CMKM)

Defendants: John Edwards, Jeffrey Turino, Urban Casavant, Nickolaj Vissokovsky, Melissa Spooner, Helen Bagley, Jeffrey Mitchell, Brian Dvorak, Ginger Gutierrez, James Kinney

Scheduled Court Hearings

PRETRIAL MOTIONS HEARING


May 3, 2011 @ 1:30 pm - (This hearing is to determine whether or not the Government must produce discovery at their expense.)



ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE


Status Hearing - Oct. 12, 2011 @8:45

Trial Date - Oct. 17, 2011 @8:30



Victim Letter

INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE FOR FEDERAL CRIME VICTIMS AND WITNESSES BROCHURE (Click here to view and print.)

Press Release

Restitution Information

Second Superseding Indictment


On March 24, 2010, the grand jury returned a sealed Second Superseding Indictment which added the following defendants: Jeffrey Turino, Nickolaj Vissokovsky and Jeffrey Mitchell. In addition, several new charges were added, alleging that certain defendants engaged in a conspiracy to conduct an enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, a conspiracy to sell unregistered securities and to commit securities fraud and a conspiracy to commit money laundering. On May 6, 2010, the Second Superseding Indictment was unsealed.

Superseding Indictment


The superseding indictment in United States v. Edwards, et al., alleges as follows: the defendants combined and conspired to perpetrate a fraud involving the issuance and sale of CMKM stock over a period of several years. Hundreds of billions of shares of CMKM stock were sold to thousands of investors during that span. Investors in CMKM are invited (but not required) to complete the following questionnaire. The questionnaire solicits information pertaining to this case for purposes of enabling prosecutors to confer with and receive information and opinions from victims of the CMKM scheme. Please note that while the completed questionnaires will not be publicly accessible, relevant information may be disclosed to the court and/or defense counsel in accordance with the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and other laws.

Is the information you submit secure? Yes. According to Department of Justice computer personnel, the data you submit is protected to the same extent as any other information maintained by the Justice Management Division of the Department of Justice. Our computer personnel believe that the greatest security vulnerabilities lie for victims whose computers do not have a firewall enabled, or do not have up to date anti-virus software and anti-malware software.
What is the deadline to complete this questionnaire? March 31, 2010.

www.justice.gov/usao/nv/victim_witness/case_updates.html




The Questionnaire


Attention: The information solicited in this form is being collected as part of an ongoing federal investigation and criminal prosecution within the jurisdiction of the United States Department of Justice. Materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations may constitute a felony in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001. Responses, although welcomed, will not increase the likelihood of any restitution.







Today's Date




First Name *




Last Name *




Address*




State
--Select a State-- Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Foreign Country



Country






Telephone number where you can be reached
() -





Alternative telephone number where you can be reached
() -





Email address






What is your Shareholder ID number?







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




If you have ever spoken with the following persons, please check all boxes that apply:

John M. Edwards
Urban Casavant
Ginger Gutierrez
James Kinney
Helen Bagley
Brian Dvorak






Did you purchase CMKM shares? *
Yes
No



If yes, please answer the following questions:



How many shares did you purchase?


Certificate number(s) of the shares:


At the time you purchased your shares, how did you learn of CMKM? Please check all boxes that apply:

Internet forum/chat room
Attended promotional event
Learned from friends
Learned from family members
Received solicitation
Other (25 words maximum)





When did you purchase your shares?
--Select a Month-- January February March April May June July August September October November December --Select a Year-- 1999 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 19992000 2001 2002 2003 2004 20052006 2007 2008 2009

How did you purchase your shares? (25 words maximum)


In total, approximately how much money did you pay for your shares?


Did you sell any shares or recover any money?
Yes
No

If you sold any of your shares, approximately how many shares did you sell?


If you sold any of your shares, approximately how much money did you receive?








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------








Please provide any comments/information you would like the attorneys to know if there is a plea offered to the defendants in this case: (250 words maximum)







Please summarize in your own words how you or members of your family have been affected by this crime. This information will be passed on to the Judge to use before he sentences the defendants, only if they are found guilty. Please limit your responses to the six defendants charged in the indictment. (250 words maximum)







If the Court allows allocution in this case, would you like an opportunity to address the Court personally at sentencing? (Any travel involved would be the victim's responsibility)

Yes
No





Do you have information or evidence that might exculpate or be of assistance to the defendants?

Yes
No








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




I affirm that my responses are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that providing false information could subject me to the penalties under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001. *


www.justice.gov/usao/nv/questions.html



ty allrich