|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 21, 2010 7:26:41 GMT -5
Re: FYI - Bob had an operation? « Reply #45 Today at 5:27am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am back. Thank you for your kind thoughts and prayers. I had my corneas removed in both eyes and lasered to increase my vision. Amazing operation and unbelievable results. When my corneas were removed all I could see what looked like different vividly colored stars in a pitch black universe. My vision is better than 20/20, no more glasses. Yes John3339, next time I go dumpster diving I can see with clarity and precision the point of impact. I was able to have the operation without paying. I told them about CMKX and they are willing to wait until we are paid. I have a post op appointment today. See you later (no pun intended). Thank you again, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=34672&page=3#477046
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 21, 2010 17:20:31 GMT -5
Re: FYI - Bob had an operation? « Reply #76 Today at 2:42pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 12:13pm, oreodiamonds wrote:Question for the board .... I have never heard of corneas being removed & operated on and put back in the same person. I have heard when people die and they are a donor, they will transplant the cornea to a new recipient in hope of restoring site. Can anyone comment on this procedure? and best wishes for a full recovery Bob!!!! Thank you again Everyone. Here is the operation information and web page for anyone who is interested. The LASEK Procedure LASEK eye surgery - sometimes referred to as Epi-LASEK - involves removing the top layer of the cornea as a flap-like sheet before re-sculpting it with an excimer laser. uk.opticalexpress.com/laser-eye-surgery/lasek.html millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=34672&page=4#477253
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 21, 2010 17:21:17 GMT -5
Re: FYI - Bob had an operation? « Reply #80 Today at 3:18pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 10:18am, stockfred wrote:Bob...Best wishes and best vision for you. You have suffered enough health problems. Can you believe that I'm getting phone calls telling me that Bob had no operation, is not sick, and it's all a concerted act for the plaintiffs to sell shares. In this insanity, they believe that Al is preventing Tyler from receiving the trust fund, that the lawsuit is to divert us away from a class-action suit, and that selling a few billion shares is worth Al Hodges reputation, his license, and jis valuable time and effort. As I said in a previous post, they are not looking at all the circumstantial evidence. Emotions drive thoughtless statements. But, these statements go beyond rational thought. Now, that was not good for the eyes.. Here is my operation appointment.. millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=34672&page=5#477270
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 21, 2010 17:21:55 GMT -5
Re: IMO: Robert's "Hint" Within His Medical Update « Reply #42 Today at 5:06pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 2:16pm, mgpaul wrote:After all of the "hints" and "cryptic" messages and teasing leading rumors I would think that Bob would have more class than that knowing how frayed most of the shareholder base is at this point in time. IMO. Mgpaul and All, I received a lot of emails and private messages. I am not ignoring any one. It is taking me a while to get through the messages. Let me make this clear once and for all. I am not playing games, not giving vague hints, and not joking around. I am quite aware of what the Shareholders are going through and how serious their situations are. Please do not read into my message. The information being conveyed is just as I posted. Medical. Yes I did have an operation. Yes, Optical Express agreed to do the operation now and I could pay when I receive the funds from CMKX. Optical Express offered free consultation. Test results indicated I was a good candidate for the operation. I explained my financial situation and about CMKX payout. Optical Express said they can wait for the payout and even offered no payments for 6 months at no interest if paid in full...if not paid in full after 6 months I would pay interest and make payments until the balance is paid in full. No hidden messages, just good eyesight. The Important Part. Last Friday, 12 noon EST, the transfer of the funds began with expectation of the ER Monday or Tuesday. I do not know the total amount, how the funds will be disbursed, or any more on the status. I can assure you, Attorney Hodges will notify the Shareholders as soon as it is done. No hidden messages, just good insight. As always, all the best and thank you, BHollenegg « Last Edit: Today at 5:08pm by BHollenegg » millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=34681&page=3#477291
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 23, 2010 12:01:03 GMT -5
By: bhollenegg 23 Oct 2010, 12:12 PM EDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 966031 of 966056 (Reply to 965895 by briwadd0) Jump to msg. # Briwadd0...I have always provided the shareholders as much information I can without undermining the progress made for the release of the funds. The information I provide at the time is current and correct. I do not provide or do I condone any one intentionally providing false information. In this CMKX World of uncertainty, it is imperative that the Shareholders are provided information that is accurate and current. As we all know, this does not occur too often. What I post is what I know is the current situation and from my understanding is correct. There are times the information cannot be detailed information because of the sensitivity and not knowing the total picture. When there are snapshots being presented of the total picture, there will be many different interpretations of what the total picture could be. I have provided information that is accurate and current at the time I posted the information. Obviously there are variables which can change. The one variable that I have a constant problem with is when some one changes what I posted in their attempt to figure out what the total picture could be. What I post and the message I am providing is exactly what is written...there are no hidden messages, riddles, or agendas. Unfortunately, I cannot correct every message that is being taken out of context, wording changed, or misinterpreted. I try to do my best, but one can only do so much. Hopefully you can appreciate what is happening and understand that I am doing the best I can under the circumstances. Your questions to me... "You stated that SC has already ruled on the release of funds, do you stand by that?....However, you saying that the Supreme Court is involved is pretty black and white. What say you?? Briwadd " The statements I made about the Supreme court were on the funds and not the lawsuit. This is what I posted .. "Attorney Hodges is doing an outstanding job. I cannot provide the details, but trust me on this. Attorney Hodges fought every battle (and there were many) with determination and expertise that I know will do all the Shareholders proud. When the Supreme Court gets involved, you know Attorney Hodges has tremendous influence. Attorney Hodges is a genius period. Thank you..." and "Pete...the Supreme Court already made a decision...release the funds. Attorney Hodges will notify the Shareholders when done." and... "It was in regard to releasing the funds, not the lawsuit". To answer your question... The Supreme Court involvement and their response is annotated in the notes Attorney Hodges wrote during his trip in Richmond to release the funds. "We were advised that a Supreme Ct. Justice(s) visited the FED Saturday and instructed them to “pay it all in the AM Monday – finish it by noon time." Thank you, BHollenegg ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=966031
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 8:57:37 GMT -5
October 23, 2010 Re: a post by jfarn to ponder « Result #12 Yesterday at 11:44am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 9:21am, burento wrote: Oct 22, 2010, 10:15am, goldeagle wrote:Question - If people do not want to be kept up to date with information, especially that coming from some plaintifs.....then what the hello are they on this board for? GL GE Thats just it...we want real information. Not the typical BS games that we have been getting. You know the "my source has a cousin whos broker heard about CMKX", or "this will be a week that youll never forget", or "Al seemed really excited!" or posting a song whos lyrics say things about winning and its over etc. I mean seriously how in the world anyone believes the plaintiffs at this point is beyond me, and likely delusional. These types of statements seem to be deliberate attempts to either string us all along, or to avoid prosecution for false statements. Either way, all of the plaintiffs have destroyed their own credibility. Im glad jfarn said something. If I posted every single day that we would be paid at 7pm maybe people would follow at first. But after a while noone would listen. How is it any different when the plaintiffs post this nonsense? They have acted irresponsibly. And quite honestly, they KNOW how many people are going to dissect their posts, and they STILL post with innuendo and in ways that they KNOW will ultimately lead to the shareholders being let down once again. The funny thing is that I am long CMKX, but the behavior by the plaintiffs has been totally irresponsible. And also I dont get hung up on rumors from unknown posters because we all know that they are probably working for the other side. But the plaintiffs should be held to a higher standard. Its coming up on a year Since Al Hodges gave us the message that made our jaws drop. How many years will we have to listen to these lies...oops I mean rumors. Burento...you can stick to your standards of posting false information and I will continue to stick to mine of posting the truth. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 8:58:18 GMT -5
Re: u.s. supreme court « Result #11 Yesterday at 12:17pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zieto....the bottom part of my message you cut and paste is missing...This is the entire message. Briwadd0...I have always provided the shareholders as much information I can without undermining the progress made for the release of the funds. The information I provide at the time is current and correct. I do not provide or do I condone any one intentionally providing false information. In this CMKX World of uncertainty, it is imperative that the Shareholders are provided information that is accurate and current. As we all know, this does not occur too often. What I post is what I know is the current situation and from my understanding is correct. There are times the information cannot be detailed information because of the sensitivity and not knowing the total picture. When there are snapshots being presented of the total picture, there will be many different interpretations of what the total picture could be. I have provided information that is accurate and current at the time I posted the information. Obviously there are variables which can change. The one variable that I have a constant problem with is when some one changes what I posted in their attempt to figure out what the total picture could be. What I post and the message I am providing is exactly what is written...there are no hidden messages, riddles, or agendas. Unfortunately, I cannot correct every message that is being taken out of context, wording changed, or misinterpreted. I try to do my best, but one can only do so much. Hopefully you can appreciate what is happening and understand that I am doing the best I can under the circumstances. Your questions to me... "You stated that SC has already ruled on the release of funds, do you stand by that?....However, you saying that the Supreme Court is involved is pretty black and white. What say you?? Briwadd " The statements I made about the Supreme court were on the funds and not the lawsuit. This is what I posted .. "Attorney Hodges is doing an outstanding job. I cannot provide the details, but trust me on this. Attorney Hodges fought every battle (and there were many) with determination and expertise that I know will do all the Shareholders proud. When the Supreme Court gets involved, you know Attorney Hodges has tremendous influence. Attorney Hodges is a genius period. Thank you..." and "Pete...the Supreme Court already made a decision...release the funds. Attorney Hodges will notify the Shareholders when done." and... "It was in regard to releasing the funds, not the lawsuit". To answer your question... The Supreme Court involvement and their response is annotated in the notes Attorney Hodges wrote during his trip in Richmond to release the funds. "We were advised that a Supreme Ct. Justice(s) visited the FED Saturday and instructed them to “pay it all in the AM Monday – finish it by noon time." Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 8:58:47 GMT -5
Re: u.s. supreme court « Result #10 Yesterday at 1:15pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 12:21pm, trader wrote:BOB i hope your health is better now one question which saturday you meant ? and which monday ? thank you It was a few weeks ago. I am still looking for the original trip report which has a breakdown of the each day. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 8:59:16 GMT -5
Re: u.s. supreme court « Result #9 Yesterday at 1:17pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 12:49pm, zieto wrote:Bob- My sincere apology for such an asinine error on my part. As you can see it was not deliberate. I was trying to clarify in this thread what you had posted on RB. Again - sorry! Zieto No problem Zieto..the same thing happened to me. Thank you for bringing the message over. All the best, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 8:59:49 GMT -5
Re: u.s. supreme court « Result #8 Yesterday at 1:21pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 12:55pm, diamondcg wrote: Hi Bob, on a personal note, I sure hope that your eye procedure that you had done, is big success and that you are pleased with the results. You are family to most of us and we wish you the best and whole heartely appreciate the way that you interact with us. diamondcg Now matter what obsticles life throws at you - Life Is Good. Patience=Profit imo Thank you Diamondcg....I appreciate your kind words. All the best to you... BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 9:00:16 GMT -5
Re: u.s. supreme court « Result #7 Yesterday at 1:56pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 1:28pm, carolina wrote:Bob, thank you for every effort you've made to keep us informed. I realize that what you say at the time is true. I expect that the twist, turns and downright refusal to pay us is driving you to distraction as well. Forgive please those of us who bites the hand that tries to feed us valid information. You are a better person than I. Thank you Caroline...I understand the frustrations especially when only a snapshot is given of the total situation. We are almost there. I cannot thank enough Attorney Hodges and his Staff and the CMKX Shareholders for the dedication and continued strength they have exhibited in getting justice for the CMKX Shareholders and others who were victims of an unjust situation created by entities lacking dedication, strength, and ethics. Thank you again Caroline, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 9:00:45 GMT -5
Yesterday at 1:36pm, trader wrote: Yesterday at 1:15pm, BHollenegg wrote: It was a few weeks ago. I am still looking for the original trip report which has a breakdown of the each day. Thank you, BHollenegg BOB thanks for replaying . if this was few weeks ago and nothing happened until now and not obeying the SC order that means the bad guys are winning and we still have along way to receive our money thank you No...that is not what it means...it is part of the progression in getting to the final outcome. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 9:01:14 GMT -5
Re: another great oil.ipo post « Result #5 Yesterday at 3:30pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have read this post and many by IPO. Though his post are not always clear, but they are clear who IPO is directing the messages to. CMKMDiamonds, your selection of messages to launch attacks toward me is quite obvious and praised by several prominent shareholders. Attorney Hodges and the plaintiffs are shareholders who have put themselves and their families personal lives at risk to do what is right and just for all of the shareholders. We are fighting what was a deep entrenched web of deceitful organizations whose tentacles are in the pockets of those who were entrusted to protect us. Every turn and every corner there are unexpected and expected challenges. What sets us apart from the opposition is our determination and resolve to make right for the shareholders what others have made wrong. We are dedicated to not giving up....we dedicated to fighting for the sake of the shareholders...we are dedicated to prevail for the sake of many generations. Even though individuals like you feel it is okay to hide behind the security of an alias and throw poison darts, we will continue help you and all of the shareholders, not condemn and chastise those who are an integral part of the solution in obtaining a just outcome and income for the Shareholders. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 9:01:40 GMT -5
Re: a post by jfarn to ponder « Result #4 Yesterday at 3:38pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CMKMDiamonds, your selection of messages to launch attacks toward me is quite obvious and praised by several prominent shareholders. Attorney Hodges and the plaintiffs are shareholders who have put themselves and their families personal lives at risk to do what is right and just for all of the shareholders. We are fighting what was a deep entrenched web of deceitful organizations whose tentacles are in the pockets of those who were entrusted to protect us. Every turn and every corner there are unexpected and expected challenges. What sets us apart from the opposition is our determination and resolve to make right for the shareholders what others have made wrong. We are dedicated to not giving up....we dedicated to fighting for the sake of the shareholders...we are dedicated to prevail for the sake of many generations. Even though individuals like you feel it is okay to hide behind the security of an alias and throw poison darts, we will continue help you and all of the shareholders, not condemn and chastise those who are an integral part of the solution in obtaining a just outcome and income for the Shareholders. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 9:02:31 GMT -5
Re: u.s. supreme court « Result #3 Yesterday at 4:44pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 2:24pm, bikinipro wrote: Yesterday at 1:15pm, BHollenegg wrote: It was a few weeks ago. I am still looking for the original trip report which has a breakdown of the each day. Thank you, BHollenegg Robert, Do you mean to tell us that you had a trip report with a breakdown of each day and you didn't keep us filled in? I did. The 'trip report' was received after the trip. All the best, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 9:03:28 GMT -5
AC Energy...CMKM spin-off? « Result #2 Yesterday at 5:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Shareholder received a stock certificate with AC Energy Shares annotating the company is a spin-off of CMKM Diamonds. I looked up the company. The BoD is Mark Hutchinson, PhD. His profile indicates he was previously the BoD of CMKM Diamonds. Any one have any information on this? Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 24, 2010 9:04:02 GMT -5
Re: AC Energy...CMKM spin-off? « Result #1 Yesterday at 5:59pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- investing.businessweek.com/resear....ivcapId=3162853COMPANY OVERVIEW AC Energy, Inc., a development stage company, holds the license for a kinetic charging system that provides an alternative power source for cell phones, personal digital assistants, cameras, and other small electronics. The company focuses on commercializing this technology. Its battery technology would allow a cell phone or other electronic device to operate without the need to be plugged into an outlet for charging. The company was formerly known as Juina Mining Corporation and changed its name to AC Energy, Inc. in February 2007. AC Energy, Inc. was founded in 1988 and is based in Charlotte, North Carolina. 4901 Rankin Place Charlotte, NC 28277 United States Founded in 1988 KEY EXECUTIVES Mr. Tom Tary Chief Technology Officer Ms. Jenny Phommabouth Secretary investing.businessweek.com/resear....ivcapId=3162853METALS AND MINING AC Energy, Inc. SnapshotPeople OverviewBoard of DirectorsCommittees AC ENERGY, INC. INSIDERS ON BOARD OF DIRECTORS Name (Connections) Relationships Title Age Jenny Phommabouth 1 Relationships Secretary, Treasurer and Director -- OTHER BOARD MEMBERS ON BOARD OF DIRECTORS Name (Connections) Relationships Primary Company Age Mark Hutchison Ph.D. 1 Relationships US Canadian Minerals, Inc. -- investing.businessweek.com/resear....0Energy,%20Inc. EXECUTIVE PROFILE Mark Hutchison Ph.D. Return to AC Energy, Inc. Former Director, US Canadian Minerals, Inc. 11 Age Total Annual Compensation This person is connected to 1 board of directors in 1 different organizations across 2 different industries. See Board Relationships -- -- BACKGROUND Mark Hutchison Ph.D. has been a research associate for the University of Arizona's lunar and planetary laboratory and is on sabbatical at the institute of advanced studies in Canberra, Australia. As a research scientist, Dr. Hutchison has directed work on projects including the controls of impurities in natural and synthetic diamonds, diamond growth at high pressure and temperatures and the mechanisms influencing "prospectivity" of deep sourced diamonds. He has been ... Read Full Background CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 936 Peace Portal Drive Blaine, Washington 98230 United States Phone: 702-357-8722 Fax: 916-357-8722 BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEMBERSHIPS Former Director CMKM Diamonds, Inc. 2004-Present Former Director US Canadian Minerals, Inc. EDUCATION millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:14:15 GMT -5
October 24, 2010 Re: Stretching things a little but what if - - - « Result #11 Yesterday at 5:34pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 10:53am, TG wrote:This is NOT my opinion, speculation, or anything I heard from any source. Sometimes my mind draws possible conclusions from facts/rumors brought out in situations. Hubby says the mind is a terrible thing in my case . This usually happens in the form of dreams. This one came about last night. I won't say what the dream was, but this morning was a real possible eye opener. So here it is: Al isn't communicating with anyone because he is under some kind of strict "protective custody" and he could compromise his location if he started posting information publicly on the INTERNET. Many times we have heard how dangerous the people he is fighting against are. Maybe he is being protected because of threats on his life. This thought came about after hearing the words "military involved" from Bob. The dream I had last night was the military stepping in and taking the shareholders into protective custody because the bad guys are Really Angry. When I woke up I thought Al might already be there. Stretching it a lot but who knows - - - - TG....Did I post the "military involved" some where or are you referring to the two plaintiffs that are military. Do you have a link? Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:16:26 GMT -5
Re: Can anyone clarify this? « Result #10 Yesterday at 9:55pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Statute of Limitations? Attorney Bill Frizzell's research he provided IBM Task Force. Attorney Bill Frizzell “The cases which I have found interpreting the relevant statutes do not suggest a specific time period within which to request action.” My experience (BHollenegg). I was in a law suit. The opposition tried to use the Statute of Limitations. The Statute of Limitations was thrown out because the opposition covered up the facts and provided information that was incorrect or misleading. [Sounds familiar??? CMKX/SEC] The clock was reset for the new Statues start date. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:18:19 GMT -5
Re: Ya'll are very caring folk BUT « Result #9 Yesterday at 10:13pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 5:45pm, WorkaHolic wrote:All I want is one shred of evidence that there is money there. Just one piece of paper, one solid, concrete, non-circumstantial morsel of pure evidence that I'm not living a pipe dream. Other than someone's word, I would like to see it in real life and not "I told you so" sayings. Show me something tangible. Is that too much to ask??? Work Work..evidence of the existence of the fund is annotated in the MTD transcript. As far as posting an account number or statements of the account as proof, that is not going to happen in a public forum. I do not know of any one that would post their account information in public except Tyler when they made public the UJAC Trust in their filing. Thank you BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:19:26 GMT -5
Re: Buzz Chat week of 10.25 « Result #8 Today at 10:38am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 8:45am, WorkaHolic wrote:Friends, I'm not very excited about AT offering to sell CIM shares. I've got to tell you all that this thing is starting to linger a bit too long. We're that close and plaintiffs are selling shares? I'm not convinced of the reason. I hope I'm wrong. My excitement quotient has fallen about 5 levels. I'm starting to feel played. I've always hoped that was not the case, but the longer this lingers, the more uncertain I am of success. Don't worry, I'm still hoping things will be fine, but the lack of evidence and the actions of a few have me feeling a bit down. Work Please do not include all of the plaintiffs...only one plaintiff, not plaintiffs, is selling his CIM and not his CMKX Shares. My apologies to the Shareholders who are affected negatively by this action. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:23:20 GMT -5
Re: Buzz Chat week of 10.25 « Result #7 Today at 10:50am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 9:38am, IceCrush wrote: Today at 8:45am, WorkaHolic wrote:Friends, I'm not very excited about AT offering to sell CIM shares. I've got to tell you all that this thing is starting to linger a bit too long. We're that close and plaintiffs are selling shares? I'm not convinced of the reason. I hope I'm wrong. My excitement quotient has fallen about 5 levels. I'm starting to feel played. I've always hoped that was not the case, but the longer this lingers, the more uncertain I am of success. Don't worry, I'm still hoping things will be fine, but the lack of evidence and the actions of a few have me feeling a bit down. Work I can understand that you wouldn't be convinced of the reason, but at the same time, who are we to really know what's going on in peoples lives that may affect them financially. What I find really dissappointing is that AT advertises his position. Everyone slammed Deli for selling, yet, in reality, Deli was transfering his certs, not making a profit on the shares themselves, that's why the SEC couldn't touch him. He wasn't making a market or acting as a broker. Yet, in AT's case, he doesn't state that he's breaking a cert or releasing them for what he bought them for, therefore he's advertising......and making a profit on the shares (perhaps he's not because the information is unclear), so wouldn't AT be doing exactly what Deli was accused of? This drives me crazy. People's financial position sometimes gets to a state where you have to do something or sell something that you don't want to, just to stay afloat. I understand that. But the methods being used bother me and you would think that AT as a lawyer would know better. Also too, the image he is projecting to the shareholders and how it impacts them doesn't show consideration for all that Al has done or is doing. Makes me shake my head. Excellent Post IceCrush. Thank you BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:24:26 GMT -5
Re: Buzz Chat week of 10.25 « Result #6 Today at 11:11am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 10:49am, lotsaice wrote: Today at 10:38am, BHollenegg wrote: Please do not include all of the plaintiffs...only one plaintiff, not plaintiffs, is selling his CIM and not his CMKX Shares. My apologies to the Shareholders who are affected negatively by this action. Thank you, BHollenegg Hi Bob, This is Mrs. lotsaice...who does Mr. Hodges have to ask permission from to notify us of the economic release? Thank you. Crap, NOW, I am going back to not watching the board... Attorney Hodges was trying to get permission to communicate with the Shareholders this weekend. Al did not provide who he has to receive permission from. Hopefully, we will hear from Attorney Hodges today..if not, then sometime this week. Please remain cautious when putting any weight behind rumors...If they cannot provide who their sources are at this stage, then it is best not to consider the information. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:25:01 GMT -5
Re: Buzz Chat week of 10.25 « Result #5 Today at 4:45pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not concern yourself with the rumor about the"new banking system" having an effect on the release of the funds. This does not affect the release of the funds. Attorney Hodges will communicate with the Shareholders once permission is granted. We expected permission to communicate Saturday, or Monday. Please treat rumors with caution. Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:25:45 GMT -5
Re: Buzz Chat week of 10.25 « Result #4 Today at 4:53pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Dollar versus the British Pound is strong. If you click on the 5 year exchange rate chart in the link provided you can see how strong the Dollar is. The lower the graph the stronger the Dollar. In 2008, one British Pound cost $2.00 US Dollars. Today one British Pound costs $1.58 US Dollars. The US Dollar is 21% stronger buying power today than two years ago. Thank you BHollenegg www.dollars2pounds.com/ExchangeRateChart.aspx millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:26:37 GMT -5
Re: Buzz Chat week of 10.25 « Result #3 Today at 5:00pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 4:51pm, trader wrote:BOB nice to see you in this board . do you think AL will bring us good news once he gets the permission ? thank you I hope so Trader. I expected news last week. All the best, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:27:12 GMT -5
Re: Buzz Chat week of 10.25 « Result #2 Today at 5:40pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 5:08pm, newtraderpq wrote:Bhollenegg...once permission given, what kind of update should be expected...We're done with instructions for payment? we're done, we'll let you know when money will be available? we're done and we know payout /share? tks, Newtraderpq....I do not know. I have not heard from Attorney Hodges since late Friday night. This is an extremely complex situation with complex issues being worked at several different levels. As I posted earlier I expected to hear something definite last Monday/Tuesday. Thank you Newtraderpq, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 25, 2010 21:47:59 GMT -5
Re: Buzz Chat week of 10.25 « Result #1 Today at 5:52pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 5:20pm, luci wrote: Today at 5:00pm, BHollenegg wrote: I hope so Trader. I expected news last week. All the best, BHollenegg Robert, you're up late... So are you Luci and even up later than us is Cris in Spain. I almost caught up with responding to mail until the "new banking system" rumor...now I am back to square one. All the best, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 28, 2010 10:28:02 GMT -5
To All « Thread Started Today at 9:42am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am receiving a considerable amount of messages and will try to respond as soon as possible. Please remain positive. There is a concerted effort to get the release done. An announcement will be made hopefully before, if not, by Friday. Sometimes we interpret the silence as no one cares, are not doing anything, are not listening to us .... this is quite understandable and a valid concern when official information is scarce. I want to let you, the Shareholders, know the details, what a battle Attorney Hodges is going through to get the funds released, and every victory, but because the opposition monitors all of the forums I cannot. Those who have tried have taken a lot of abuse trying to keep the shareholders updated without undermining the progress made in getting the funds identified and released to the Shareholders. We know and live what the shareholders are going through. I am not authorized by Attorney Hodges to put out the info I receive from his updates to me. I know I risk having lost Al's 100% trust he had for me, but I am a shareholder first and a plaintiff last. My heart is with the shareholders who are great law abiding families struggling to keep whatever they have and believe in life. I spoke with Al several times and his heart is the same place for the shareholders. Al is in a difficult position, his heart wants to tell all to the shareholders, except he knows that it will jeopardize what has been accomplished in getting the funds identified and released to the shareholders. Al has a considerable responsibility that he has shouldered quite well especially considering the relentless attacks from every direction, even from some of the shareholders he is fighting for. A saving grace for all of the Shareholders who have endured so much emotional and physical pain in all this madness, we are getting ready to cross the finish line with the GOOD being the victors! Thank you, BHollenegg millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=34817&page=1#479607
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Oct 29, 2010 21:30:28 GMT -5
|
|