January 30, 2011
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Reply #7 Today at 4:22pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today at 3:37pm, wolfbela wrote:When you verify a rumor, then what does it become.. a verified rumor..
Don't you need facts to verify something, not tired sources..
Bob is just keeping the wheels of the machine rolling along.
He has nothing of substance, sorry to say..
We can all read Hodges' tired updates... we don't need them rehashed..
Why doesn't Bob H check who involved in the legal action still owns shares..
Now he can verify that...maybe...
J WB
Reply:
Jerry...please quit making false accusations. Attorney Hodges and the plaintiffs still have ALL their shares and have not sold. If you are going to be the truth seeker, you should start with your messages and at least try to meet the standard you set for others.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=8258&page=1#113477******************
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Reply #10 Today at 4:42pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today at 4:08pm, cmc wrote:I'm surprised anyone would still believe Bob Hollenegg's updates, which have really become painfully boring. I'd love for this to end, sooner the better and the truth come to light (finally)
Reply:
Here, let me drop what is imprortant to me and pay attention to you and all of your needs. I am surprised you read my posts since they are for the shareholders who want to know. Now I can return to what is important.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=8258&page=1#113480*****************
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Result #13 Yesterday at 5:04pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday at 4:27pm, Z06mike wrote:
Yesterday at 3:37pm, wolfbela wrote:When you verify a rumor, then what does it become.. a verified rumor..
Don't you need facts to verify something, not tired sources..
Bob is just keeping the wheels of the machine rolling along.
He has nothing of substance, sorry to say..
We can all read Hodges' tired updates... we don't need them rehashed..
Why doesn't Bob H check who involved in the legal action still owns shares..
Now he can verify that...maybe...
J WB
Wolf,
Verification? I'm afraid the Peter M. call is the same as the PA AG call on MLK day. Again, Korsakoff's syndrome, suspension of disbelief, or payroll. Take your pick. The house of cards continues to implode.
One of my sources tells me next week is it-done! Even that source is losing faith.
Again, a majority vote will NOT be the most efficient path. Wary shareholders should pull up all the guru plugs from acca, Lt.kk., Chucky, et al, and compare to where we are-nowhere... Well, nowhere except the AGs.
Folks, we tried to explain this back in the late summer, early fall. We put the AG action together for a reason. Many joined and some dropped out because they wanted to "wait-n-see." The November election and the 10-day orientation of the newly elected, and Al's refile, and the hearing, and the dismissal, and Al's betting man prediction, and Al's update of 80 cents and Global Intelligence, etc., etc., have all past.
There is no genius IBM plan, no genius PLAM, no 40-years-experience slam dunk, no 4x Bivens case winner strategy, no WGS. The strategy is a classic paradox. Hoodwinked is an understatement. This is soley about control of assets that we have been ruled as having no right or interest in. And, the appeal will rule the same since the chance to provide evidence has passed.
Don't believe it? Just start at now and work backward. You'll see it's bifurcated. One arm is control, the other is pennies per click. Neither are related, but independently support each other. Perfect!
Mike
Reply:
Mike...I don't appreciate your MLK jab. I did call and was informed they were closed for MLK and the following day due to elections and will be open on Wednesday. I am surprised at your twisting the facts as you have done before in taking up for Wolfbela.
Why don't you hire an Attorney and work on releasing the funds to the shareholders instead of going after the ones working on releasing the funds? If you do not believe in the funds, then let the ones who want their funds continue with pursuing the funds do so.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 5:06pm by BHollenegg »
*****************
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Result #12 Yesterday at 5:15pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday at 3:11pm, hurricane wrote:Why is Bob trying to contact PM? That would be the job of AH...the lawyer. If I was PM I would not call Bob back either. Bob calling PM makes as much sense as anyone of us regular shareholders trying to make that call.
Hurricane
BTW: Not knocking Bob. Just trying to figure out roles and responsibilities between AH and Bob
Reply:
Hello Hurricane..Mr. Peter Maheu was ignoring Attorney Hodges attempts to resolve the situation. Peter Maheu did not ignore the shareholders who contacted him. I was asked by the shareholders why the shareholders could get through and not Attorney Hodges. I agreed to check this out. I hit the same wall as Attorney Hodges when I tried to communicate with Mr. Peter Maheu.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
***************
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Result #11 Yesterday at 5:29pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday at 2:07pm, gjfromfla wrote:Can you ask bob if he heard anything about packets being sent on Monday or Tuesday? It seemed from Mona that was the newest rumor (that was posted on this board). Any truth? Can you ask Bob to ask Dennis to pay my dry cleaning from last month... My "knickers" are still bunched up!!!! Would like to hear from the State of the Hodges again.
Hello Gjfromfla... I have not heard "anything about packets being sent on Monday or Tuesday?" from Attorney Hodges. I am not conveying it is right or wrong, just I have not heard these two days from Attorney Hodges. The last I heard from Attorney Hodges, he is confident we will be paid in the near future, if not this coming week.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 5:30pm by BHollenegg »
*********************
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Result #10 Yesterday at 5:36pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday at 5:17pm, runningrich wrote:Hi Robert. Hope all is well and better today! There are many here who offer their sincerest thanks for all you do. We have won. We will be paid. If we wait a bit longer so be it.
God Bless those with Righteous Intent.
Al Hodges I believe has done an incredible job. No, I don't need details or the truth. As most, just need to get paid and move into the future.
God Bless you and yours Bob.
Regards,
RunningRich
Reply:
Thank you Runningrich...my best to you always,
BHollenegg
***************
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Result #9 Yesterday at 5:38pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday at 5:35pm, brockley wrote:
Yesterday at 3:37pm, wolfbela wrote:When you verify a rumor, then what does it become.. a verified rumor..
Don't you need facts to verify something, not tired sources..
Bob is just keeping the wheels of the machine rolling along.
He has nothing of substance, sorry to say..
We can all read Hodges' tired updates... we don't need them rehashed..
Why doesn't Bob H check who involved in the legal action still owns shares..
Now he can verify that...maybe...
J WB
Jerry..
You seem like a very intelligent man, But, If you let a little air out of your head you could think a little clearer , like how to use those big words like Verify and Truth and Oh my favorite Facts, Look them up learn there meaning then come back with their correct and meaningful uses....
Thanks !
Reply:
Thank you Lonewolf, Ucaughtme, and Brockley,
BHollenegg
*****************
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Result #8 Yesterday at 7:51pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday at 6:13pm, wolfbela wrote:Bob,
So you are going on the record without doubt that you can personally state on 1/30/11 you have complete knowledge of all the share holdings of the plaintiffs and Attorney Hodges, and that these holdings are intact as reported, and no shares have been sold over the course of the Bivens action, including 2010, by the plaintiffs and Attorney Hodges.
You have seen their stock certificates so you know they still hold all their reported shares of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
I just want to make sure that you don't perjure yourself. I will be saving your answer for further reference.
J WB
Reply:
Jerry..You keep going on and on and on, just like an Eveready Battery...unfortunately only one has a positive side. You do not qualify to be a judge. I do not have to worry about perjuring myself...never have and never will. I have a right to post messages on a public message board to keep shareholders who want to be informed. Your constant badgering, immature threats and remarks are not seeking the truth....it is seeking attention and suppressing the truth. Honesty will prevail.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
******************
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Result #7 Yesterday at 8:38pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday at 6:59pm, Z06mike wrote:
Yesterday at 5:04pm, BHollenegg wrote:
Mike...I don't appreciate your MLK jab. I did call and was informed they were closed for MLK and the following day due to elections and will be open on Wednesday. I am surprised at your twisting the facts as you have done before in taking up for Wolfbela.
Why don't you hire an Attorney and work on releasing the funds to the shareholders instead of going after the ones working on releasing the funds? If you do not believe in the funds, then let the ones who want their funds continue with pursuing the funds do so.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
Bob,
I had hoped it wouldn't come to this, but if I've twisted the facts before, I would think you "wouldn't" be surprised. And, if I have, please feel free to point them out because I try very hard to make sure I provide accurate information, as you do. However, stating you had been turned in by people in the AG Action, and are being investigated because of it, along with your payout being delayed because of the investigation, was more than just a tad misleading.
As for the PA AG, it was my understanding that you stated you had communicated with the PA AG on MLK's birthday and that you had a call scheduled for that Wednesday. If that's wrong, I stand corrected. But, I'm not sure why, if you did call on MLK's birthday, you would feel the need to post as much since you didn't, in that post, let us know it was closed.
Additionally, Bob, I am not going after anyone, especially those working toward releasing the funds. If you know of someone I'm after, please state as much. My work is with the State Attorneys General to begin with the Marketmakers and Brokers that NSSed our stock. So far, there's thirteen of them in the mix.
If you have any recommendations for a good attorney, let me know. And, how much was your retainer with Al? My funds are low from helping out shareholders in need, so I don't have a lot.
Mike
Reply:
Mike...The reason I stated I called Monday is because I said I would call Monday during the weekend exchange of messages between the shareholders . I did call and was informed they are closed for regular business Monday for MLK Holiday and Tuesday for elections and will be open Wednesday. I posted I called and will be calling back Wednesday. I provided the number so anyone can call and check it out. Why are you making it out like it didn't happen. I have my phone bill I will be glad to submit.
As far as the AG investigating, Wolfbela said I was turned in and I am being investigated by several State Attorney Generals. I pointed out the worst that can happen to me because I have been posting the truth is a possible delay of my distribution. I was not misleading anyone.
You stated you are not going after anyone, especially the ones working on releasing the funds. Your support of Wolfbela's actions and your statement doesn't sound convincing, "There is no genius IBM plan, no genius PLAM, no 40-years-experience slam dunk, no 4x Bivens case winner strategy, no WGS. The strategy is a classic paradox. Hoodwinked is an understatement. This is soley about control of assets that we have been ruled as having no right or interest in. And, the appeal will rule the same since the chance to provide evidence has passed."
Thank you,
BHollenegg
********************
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Result #5 Yesterday at 9:53pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Georgia18. in response to your questions.
Bob ....can you state what legal documents about the Trust Fund you have seen....this could put an entirely different light on things.....maybe I am the only one but I never saw it mentioned before....are these documents stating that the Trust exists..and who were the documents prepared by....thank you...
Have you read any of the court documents? I have legal documents communicating about the trust accounts, existence, funding, and movement..
This statement leads to an interesting question....a rhetorical one perhaps....if the Appeal would put pressure on Global why wasn't this done from day one in anticipation of any delays.....we have previously been delayed so many times...I would think some precautionary steps would be advised based on previous delays....IMHO
The appeal is part of the process to ensure all the future funds are released. The appeal was filed in a timely manner. The appeal was not intended to put pressure on Global Intelligence...no one expected Global Intelligence to be the cause of the present situation. I just pointed out how the appeal could have an influence on the government pressuring Global Intelligence to release the funds.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob are you saying that the National Security was just an excuse all this time.....
No, i did not say that.
Bob...All should be done by JAN 21,2011...that did not come true...or did it?
Please read Attorney's Update..."should"
The Dinar on the Forex....The Dinar RV....that did not come true....or did it?
What do I have to do with this? I am focused on the CMKX Funds.
We have won....that did not come true .....or did it....
Yes it did...we are now separate from the WGS and do not fall under their stipulations for releasing the funds. I explained this many times that Attorney has been fighting to get the CMKX Funds separated from the WGS.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the so called SC directive was disregarded...what would make you think the the appeal would ensure anything?
It is part of the legal process....if you don't file, then the opposition can say they did not know. If they choose to break the law then they will be held accountable.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
*****************
Re: New LLC to go Fwd
« Result #3 Yesterday at 11:00pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan 29, 2011, 4:54pm, coachphilm wrote:MEL's OPEN HOUSE is hosting a meeting tonight in Paltalk, we are inviting some professionals to informally advise the best way to set up an llc and recreate the OG effort with private players unrelated to CMKX.
Will let you know how this works out.
Plan is to do as much of the legwork cheaply and have all personal data secured with an audit firm with daily summary of results reported to llc, which would in turn report weekly to rooms & boards
At such time that a clear strategy can be realized some financial request may be made similar to OG 1 & 2.
Everyone will have access to summary.
Last nite a group discussed this issue in Mels Open House it was decided to move forward.
We are:
1-FORMING an llc non-profit to legally operate a business
__a.HIRE a license,bonded audit firm
__b.RECEIVE regular, timely Summary Reports
__c.REPORT to shareholder base
2-MISSION
__a.UNITE shareholder base
__b.COLLECT data
____i-Broker,Cert#, Cert Qty,street(non certed shareholders)
____ii-Confirmation of buy from broker
____iii-INCLUDE ALL SHAREHOLDERS
__c.PROVIDE a rumor free environment
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -l
This effort is being led by:
COACHPHILM
VNGNTN
OLDPRO
KSP11
Coach
SemperFi
****************************************************
please feel free to submit any names for ballot to represent you in new LLC. Feel free to come in Mels Paltalk room, tell them where you heard the info and submit your nominees to an Admin. or send me an IM here.
Thank You
Coach
Reply:
Coachphilm...I applaud and support your group's Professional Action Plan.
Thank you,
BHollenegg
********************
Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Result #1 Yesterday at 11:13pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday at 10:56pm, ChuckWheat wrote:
Yesterday at 8:39pm, georgie18 wrote:Yes he will tell us what he knows and I appreciate that..and I will continue to ask him questions when he shares info....if he wants to answer he will if not than he won't...
Georgie-
Your reaction to my response was one of frustration. My response was driven by frustration with people demanding so much from people like Bob...but the response is not particularly personal. You're not the only person out there doing it.
Imagine what it must be like to have 20-40 people regularly making demands of you, expecting answers and re-asking when you can't provide answers fast enough (and still have a personal life too)...especially when the answers many times are already there if a person takes the time to go look for themselves.
Imagine what it's like to give information to people you care about, only to have it thrown back in your face because something neither you nor your source could control changed? Or they want to use your responses to pin you into some position...a position probably supported with out-of-context use of your response, or contorted to make it fit some pet negative idea they cooked up in the last throne room visit...?
Imagine what it's like to have health issues while you're doing all this for people who can't be satisfied...
I gave you one response, and you can see how it got to you. Bob has been dealing with everything above (and more) near-daily for over a year.
So no, you clearly don't need my approval to post obviously. But if you ask Bob a question and it doesn't get an immediate response, remember this moment....multiply that feeling by 30...and reflect on your own statement:
"I posted this earlier with no response....I am seeking the truth so perhaps you can answer my post...."
With Respects,
C-Dub
Reply:
Thank you C-Dub for understanding and conveying accurately the situation with me.
All my best,
BHollenegg
********************
cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg