|
Post by alrich on Feb 29, 2012 23:00:21 GMT -5
Re: Wyatt just said the Bivens case is moving forw « Reply #3 Today at 8:12pm »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DucDuc N Altum Wyatt, one of the plaintiffs came into pal talk at ----> (9:21 PM) *** wyatt11_11 has joined the room ***
and took the mic and said that the govt's cause was thrown out the window and that Al Hodges' lawsuit was not going to be thrown out as it was offical today.
Then he leftthe room at (9:22 PM) *** wyatt11_11 has left the room ***---------------------------------
(9:23 PM) Matt1969: repo, basically said that the judege denied SEC's dismassal and so we continue forward
(9:23 PM) Matt1969: repo, basically said that the judege denied SEC's dismassal and so we continue forward///this is a good explanation of what wyatt said Mona: I went straight to Mr Hodges and here is his response:
At its most basic level, it means that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear and render a decision on the appeal.
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Mar 22, 2012 21:56:44 GMT -5
Bivens Case is extended 30 days « Thread Started Today at 8:03pm »
----------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Staub:
Plaintiffs will not oppose.
A. Clifton Hodges (CSBN 046803)
HODGES AND ASSOCIATES
4510 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., Suite 201
Westlake Village, CA 91362
TEL: (805) 371-7515
FAX: (805) 371-7514
E-Mail: al@hodgesandassociates.com
From: Staub, Keith (USACAC) [mailto:Keith.Staub@usdoj.gov] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 4:17 PM To: Al Subject: Anderson
Mr. Hodges:
The federal defendants intend to file a motion for an extension of 30 days in which to file their answering brief. Please advise if plaintiffs intend to oppose or not. Thanks.
Keith M. Staub Assistant U.S. Attorney United States Attorney's Office 300 N. Los Angeles Street, # 7516 Los Angeles, CA 90012 (213) 894-7423 fax: (213) 894-7819
FROM GRAPEVINE 10 pm 3/22/2012 > onceuponatime_3: Florida wyatt came in
Floridanative: why another extension? Floridanative: what did wyatt say? napleslynn: The Government brief was due March 28th and they have requested from Al an additional 30 days if the plaintiffs didn't object and Al has agreed to the extension. Al said that we should be paid before the 28th of April. Wyatt said that there has been al lot of talk about this ending very soon and Al has been very positive lately
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Mar 29, 2012 9:53:55 GMT -5
Heeeeeeeeere's............Jerry « Thread Started Today at 8:59am » By: retireman 29 Mar 2012, 09:31 AM CDT Rating: post rating 5 Msg. 1076308 of 1076310 Jump to msg. # Mr. Kirkpatrick, (As emailed to him) If you proceed with your idea of issuing preferred shares in this company, and take away the voting rights of the common shareholders, and grant privileged rights to a certain few, I will initiate a court action, in whatever state this company is incorporated in, and seek to put it into receivership so quickly, it will make your head spin, and end this nonsense and this company, and allow people to get back on with their lives. This has beyond reached the point of utter ridiculousness. USE THE SHARES IN TREASURY AND SELL THEM FOR CAPITAL. TAKE BACK ANY SHARES OR OPTION RIGHTS FROM THE INCOMPETENT COUNSEL, MANAGEMENT AND BOARD AND USE THEM FOR THE COMPANY AND THE SHAREHOLDERS. Just test what we can afford to test. Take it a step at a time. Nobody cared when Kevin West, Mark Faulk, and Jim Lowden were taking salaries, medical coverage and other expenses and couldn't allot one dime for the project of testing core samples. They were too busy making a living from CMKX, as was Bill Frizzell. All corporate management, board members and counsel since April 30, 2007 should be held legally and financially responsible for not taking the appropriate action regarding the naked short, and the rest of the horrible decisions they made along the way, costing shareholders time, money and much hardship, and possibly depriving them of a settlement that could have been life changing. Now, the top legal counsel in the naked short field wants to take the same action the AG movement did two years ago. If the company had made available the evidence they sat on illegally to the AG coordinators and the state agencies, the states' could have undertaken these investigations, and it would have been at their expense. But the powers of Tyler and their supporters had all the answers, and here we sit years later....screwed... But why do we even need a naked short legal action.. we have Al Hodges, a man who has never lied to the shareholders, who tells us the trust exists and was rolled into the World Global Settlement Funds. Why even waste the TX experts' time and money when Al Hodges states the short was settled and we just wait on his legal expertise to get our monies released. This will be another situation where, unfortunately, you can be held liable for not pursuing any evidence that Hodges may have and be withholding from the company and shareholders. As CEO, it is your mandatory obligation to stop this nonsense, get this man to put up, or take him to court, and settle this. Or this will be just a repeat of the last 5 years we have endured in Tyler. To be honest, I expected more and am greatly disappointed. One more question, what will be left for the shareholders once all these lawyers get done with all of these legal actions....probably not much... I think you know I am serious and a man of my word. Take away the rights of any shareholders and we will have serious issues between us. Sincerely, J WB /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////From Mr. Kirkpatrick... On Mar 29, 2012, at 10:06 AM, stevek wrote: Jerry: I just tried to call you. Call me to discuss your e-mail when able. I have no interest in taking voting rights from any shareholder. I am only interested in raising the funds to get the core samples tested. I am not even sure that it is legal to sell preferred shares, or even to sell the class C shares we have in reserve. I am awaiting a return call from the law firm I would use to handle the share offering to ascertain what the company can or cannot do to raise funds. A respected lawyer I know suggested preferred shares as one option, but he was unsure of the legalities. I do intend to find a legal and proper way to raise some funds to do the sample testing, which should be exciting news to you and all shareholders. I do not have the cost estimates yet from Mr. Koch. However, it is clear to me that the samples must be tested for the benefit of all shareholders. As you well know, I cannot answer the question as to "why" previous management did not pursue the naked short issue. We have no funds to pursue them legally at this time even if it was appropriate to do so. All I can do is take any and all prudent actions from the time I took over and try to salvage something from this very difficult situation. I have counted on your support, and still do desire it and need it. I do not think you are the kind of man who would want to shut down a company that has potential to emerge from the ashes. All 50,000 shareholders deserve something better than that. As to Al Hodges - I am not in position to do anything about his cause but what I have done at this time. I am focusing on what I can do to make a difference for CMKM as a company. I have had numerous shareholders request or even demand that we test the samples. I have negotiated a deal with Mr. Koch that supersedes the 1010 agreement, and allows testing at a much, much lower cost. Again, that should be good news to you and each shareholder. All we need is a legal and proper way to raise those needed funds quickly. There is no evil agenda at work here, Jerry. Only a desire to do what is right for CMKM and most of all, the shareholders. Please call me to discuss as soon as possible. Thank you. Steve Kirkpatrick Sent from my iPhone Mr. Kirkpatrick, When I calm down, I will call you.. You understand the passion I have that all should be treated fairly. After years of fighting, I have had enough. I want the common shareholder to have their rights respected here and not be played one more day. The shareholders have been jerked around long enough, and the former players in this company are greatly to blame, as is Al Hodges... I threw my support behind you, for whatever good that will do you, because I believed in you, but this cannot be business as usual. I will reach out to you..later today... Good luck,.. Jerry Read more: qbidtalk.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=8811#ixzz1qWA0dDLp
|
|
|
Post by siriusnews on Mar 31, 2012 0:00:27 GMT -5
pretty comical stuff AL thanks for the good laugh, he almost said he was talking his ball and going home again... like he does every month.
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Apr 3, 2012 10:15:57 GMT -5
www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-08/s70808-414.pdf Chairman Christopher Cox May 19, 2008 Securities & Exchange Commission Washington, DC RE: REG SHO, Proposed Rule 10B-21 Dear Chairman Cox: As Chairman and CEO of BioTech Medics, Inc., (Pinksheets: BMCS) I would like to endorse what was said in an earlier response by Pat Cluney from Florida and add to what has already been posted. Mr. Cluney is a shareholder in BMCS. I have witnessed from personal experience over three and a half (3-1/2) years of illegal manipulation of our stock, inclusive of counterfeiting, forging, shorting and naked shorting. I have filed over a hundred Suspicious Trading Reports (SARS) with every regulatory agency imaginable and over 36,000 pages of evidence with the SEC. There is no discipline with naked shorting and repeat offenders have no fear of the SEC because the chances of a violator being caught and disciplined is negligible. Most of the repeat offenders take the same cavalier attitude as that of a serial killer. Once you have killed, the penalty is no greater for repeat killings. So illegal manipulation of stocks continues daily by repeat offenders with impunity. Case in point: CMKM Diamonds (a/k/a Casavant Mining, now revoked former stock symbol: CMKX). The SEC has had an ongoing investigation for over 5 years titled: In the Matter of CMKM Diamonds, Inc., LA-3028. This case goes back to 2002 and involves approximately $100 million in theft of investor funds with nearly ONE TRILLION Shares of stock, a majority of which were illegally issued without pre-requisite restrictions, legal opinions; or legal opinions issued from deceased attorneys and/or were naked shorted in the market with counterfeit shares. It was not until April 7, 2008 that the SEC has finally taken action in US Dist. Court, Las Vegas, NV regarding this egregious fraud upon the investing public. Most of the stolen funds are gone, leaving investors pennies on the dollar if anything. The “mastermind” (SEC words not mine) in this fraud, John Edwards was also the “mastermind” of illegally issued shares in BioTech Medics (and dozens more pennystocks). Edwards had numerous accomplices who have yet to be cited by the SEC. The fraud in our case stems back to 2002 and involves scores of millions of dollars in fraud and over 50 million shares that we have been able to verify in an audit of our shareholders. However, FINRA over a year ago in the CMKX matter sanctioned NevWest Securities Corp (CRD # 46464) of Las Vegas and Sergey Rumyantsev and Anthony Santos $100,000 and K Houser REG SHO- 10B-21 Proposal Comments ( Page # 1) $75,000 each respectively, for laundering over $58 million of John Edwards and over 20 of his sham shell trusts and companies that were used to perpetrate the alleged fraud and benefit from the naked shorting. NevWest reportedly received over $2.4 million in commissions. So the alleged manipulators got away with $58 million and the sanctioned stock broker facilitators were slapped on the wrist and got away with nearly $2 million in profits. Where is the justice in this “discipline” Another case in point: In the Matter of SEC vs. Pinnacle Business Management and Jeffrey G. Turino, Case No. 8:02-cv-00822-EAK, US Dist Ct, Tampa Div. Judge Elizabeth Kovachevich found Turino guilty of violating the Securities Act and prohibited Turino from trading penny stocks for five years (which ends December 5, 2008). Within five (5) days subsequent to Judge Kovachevich’s Order, Turino allegedly had established one or more sham sell corporations to trade the CMKX stock and scores of other stocks since that time, all in violation of the Order and in full contempt of court. Where is the SEC? The SEC is impudent, under staffed and overwhelmed by the avalanche of stock fraud. You, Mr. Cox admitted in your March 4, 2008 statement that the SEC had received over 400 complaints in the past year alleging stock fraud. That is over one complaint per day. In my opinion: When will enough be enough? How much evidence do you need? A representative of OTCBB commented regarding their SHORT REPORTING. It is FLAWED. The OTCBB representative stated that a) there is no guarantee as to 100% compliance, b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting, c) offshore brokerage firms permit a higher ratio of shorting stock against restricted shares and d) sophisticated shorters can circumvent reporting by getting out of their short position on the short reporting days and get back in the next day. My recommendations 1) PROHIBIT ANY AND ALL SHORTING OF PENNY STOCKS PERIOD! These fledging companies have enough mine fields to get through to become successful. By the SEC allowing legitimate and illegitimate parties to run a penny stock price up and then short it to profit from taking it down (pump and dump) is just not fair to the investing retail market. 2) REQUIRE THE POSTING OF A 25% OR HIGHER SHORT DEPOSIT BY ANY PARTY SHORTING ANY STOCKS ON ANY MAJOR EXCHANGE. The Short Deposit would be proportionate to the amount of stock shorted. For example: If John Doe wants to short XXXX –NASDAQ or AMEX shares, he must post a cash short deposit with the brokerage firm of Twenty-five Percent (25%) of the shorted value. The short deposit must be held by the brokerage firm for a term of a minimum of six (6) months subsequent to the last shorted trade. Any public company that alleges improprieties files a Suspicious Trading Activity Report and a mandatory K Houser REG SHO- 10B-21 Proposal Comments (Page # 2) arbitration hearing must take place within sixty (60) days. If the shored public company prevails in arbitration, they receive the cash Short Deposit, plus any other award granted by the arbitration. If the shorter has been found to violate any rules, the shorter will be prohibited via permanent injunction for life from shorting again. 3) REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL AND IMMEDIATE PENALTY FOR NON-REPORTING BROKERAGE DEALERS IN THEIR FAILURE TO REPORT THE SHORTING OF STOCK (i.e. $100,000 first offense, $500,000 second). 4) REQUIRE THE REPORTING OF ANY SHORT POSITION DURING ANY THIRTY (30) DAY PERIOD WHEN THE SHORTING IS IN EXCESS OF ONE HUNDRED SHARES OR THE VALUE EXCEEDS $100. 5) BROKERAGE FIRMS AND THIRD PARTIES WHO AID AND ABET A KNOWN ADJUDGED STOCK FRAUDSTAR WILL BE FINED $1 MILLION. 6) IF THE SEC FAILS OR REFUSES TO TAKE ACTION ON A REPORTED ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SECURITIES FRAUD WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE FILING OF A COMPLAINT, AN INDIVIDUAL MAY SEEK REDRESS IN FEDERAL COURT. IF THE PARTY PREVAILS THEY WILL RECEIVE TREBLE DAMAGES, PLUS LEGAL FEES AND COSTS. Respectfully submitted, Chairman/CEO BioTech Medics, Inc. KEITH HOUSER (signature) P O Box 93476 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone 972-274-5533 CC: SEC Enforcement-Washington, DC US Dept of Justice-US Attorney S Dist of NY, NYC K
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Apr 15, 2012 12:09:39 GMT -5
NASD ALLOWS JEFFERIES AND COMPANY TO ILLEGALLY NAKED SHORT 111 BILLION SHARES OF CMKM STOCK In the "Jefferies Letter," dated 5-6-05, Cathleen Shine, Deputy General Counsel for Jefferies and Company (Jefferies), responds to requests from Ms. Anne Dansard Glowacki, NASD, concerning Jefferies' failure to report certain trades in CMKM in 3-04. According to the "Jeffferies Letter," the trades, amounting to 111 billion CMKM shares, involves "two broker dealer customers of Jefferies" who requested that trades in CMKM be settled "Ex-Clearing," which are trades that are cleared outside a clearing house and therefore are unreported. That is tantamount to the "two broker dealer customers" requesting that Jefferies allow them to illegally naked short 111 billion CMKM shares. According to the "Jeffferies Letter," Jefferies "made a business and operational risk decision to allow a limited number of broker dealer customers who were long sellers of CMKX to settle the trades "Ex-Clearing."" That is tantamount to Jeffries confessing that it made "a business and operational risk decision to allow a limited number of broker dealer customers to" illegally naked short 111 billion CMKM shares. In Civil Action No. 08- CV 0437, 4-7-08, United States District Court for the District of Nevada, page 3, Leslie Hakala alleges that "To divert attention from their own dumping of CMK shares, Casavant persuaded CMKM's investors that the reported high trading volume in CMK stock reflected extensive "naked short sellng" rather than ordinary stock dilution." QUESTIONS Were/Are the SEC in general and Leslie Hakala in particular aware of the "Jefferies Letter" on or before the writing of said civil action? If not, are the SEC in general and Leslie Hakala in particular grossly negligent? If so, how could Leslie Hakala have possibly alleged "high trading volume in CMK stock reflected extensive "naked short sellng" rather than ordinary stock dilution?" END OF QUESTIONS THE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCE OF CMKM'S IMMENSELY VALUABLE 1.9 MILLION ACRES OF MINING CLAIMS IN THE FORT A LA CORNE AREA OF CENTRAL SASKATCHEWAN On 5-16-05, CMKM announces in a PR that it possesses the drilling report prepared by William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project. The drilling report was commissioned for CMKM by 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. Mr. Jarvis was asked to report on and make recommendations for the kimberlite exploration program. The scope of work completed includes: 1. a review of the Geological setting as it relates to kimberlite and diamond exploration; 2. an examination of the geological and data provided by the CMKM; 3. a review of published geological reports and maps; 4. a visit to the area of the concession. The following are excerpts from Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project: "Drilling results and additional ground magnetic and gravity surveys have shown the best known kimberlite bodies to be bedded, and to have a very different shape from most known kimberlite bodies. In most of the well-known diamond mines in Africa, for example, and in those in the NWT in Canada, the upper portions of the kimberlites bodies have been eroded, leaving only the feeder pipe, which has a "carrot" shape, getting smaller in diameter with depth. However, in the Fort ¨¤ la Corne swarm, the tops of the kimberlitic volcanic edifices are COMPLETELY PRESERVED [emphasis added by author], and they are shaped more or less like a soup bowl, with two larger horizontal dimensions, and one smaller vertical dimension. Several of these have an inferred geological resource (based on a few holes and on geophysical modeling) in excess of 100 million tonnes, one has nearly a billion tons, and one group of five which are close together, or perhaps coalescing, contain about 2 billion tons of kimberlite. There are thus HUGE VOLUMES OF KIMBERLINE WITHIN A FEW HUNDRED METRES OF THE SURFACE." [emphasis added by author] "The Fort ¨¤ la Corne swarm of kimberlitic bodies is the LARGEST SWARM KNOWN IN THE WORLD [emphasis added by author], and some of the bodies are the LARGEST KNOWN SUCH BODIES IN THE WORLD." [emphasis added by author] On 6-24-09, the SEC filed "Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant John Edwards (#991), Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant Daryl Anderson (#102), and Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants Kathleen and Anthony Tomasso pursuant to Civil Action No. 08- CV 0437, 4-7-08, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. On page 3 of said Motion for Summary Judgment, the SEC alleges "CMKM provided investors with phony maps and fabricated videos of alleged mineral claims in North and South America." QUESTIONS Is Leslie Hakala or whoever wrote the said Motion for Summary Judgment aware of the Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project? If so, is Leslie Hakala or whoever wrote said Motion for Summary Judgment also referring to the Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project "phony" or "fabricated?" If so, is Leslie Hakala or whoever wrote said Motion for Summary Judgment also referring to N. Ralph Newson, M.Sc., P. Eng., P.Geo. as "phony?" If not, why is Leslie Hakala or whoever wrote said Motion for Summary Judgment unaware of the Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project? If Leslie Hakala or whoever wrote said Motion for Summary Judgment is unaware of the Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project, could that be construed as gross incompetence and negligence? ¡¡¡¡ Thank you, Robert ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=850778cmkmgrapevine.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=info&action=display&thread=1032
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Apr 15, 2012 13:09:03 GMT -5
Posted by Sandra Hicks---------------------------------------------Blog: Lewis Silenced, Threatened Over Merrill « Reply #4 on May 2, 2011, 2:53pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- pb86: oldepro/Daniel Bogdon Returns ... from the gv scroll today (August 2, 2009) - > coladaking_5: A former U.S. attorney for Nevada who was forced to resign during the Bush administration could soon be getting his old job back.President Barack Obama nominated Daniel G. Bogden on Friday to serve as the United States attorney for Nevada www.thenewstribune.com/tacoma/24hour/politics/story/830031.htmlmillionaires.proboards.com/index.....ay&thread=26774Daniel Bogdon Returns « Thread Started Yesterday at 8:39pm » oldepro www.nytimes.com/2009/08/01/us/politics/01attorney.htmlMichael Drosnin in his book Citizen Hughes, says Harry Reid was one of the politicians who made regular trips to Robert Maheu's office for "political contributions". In the days before reporting was required. Now this is REALLY interesting. www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/oct/20/six-questions-daniel-bogden/Daniel Bogdon and Timothy Vasquez nail John Edward's wife. WOMAN CONVICTED OF SECURITIES FRAUD SCHEME U. S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District of Nevada Daniel G. Bogden United States Attorney 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South Suite 5000 Las Vegas, NV 89101 702) 388-6336 FAX: (702) 388-6296 NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2006 PRESS CONTACTS: Natalie Collins, Public Affairs Specialist (702) 388-6508 District Internet Site - www.usdoj.gov/usao/nv/WOMAN CONVICTED OF SECURITIES FRAUD SCHEME LAS VEGAS - - A federal jury has convicted a Las Vegas woman of Securities Fraud, announced Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney for the District of Nevada. DIANA FLAHERTY, age 57, was convicted by a jury on Thursday morning, May 4, 2006, of one count of Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud, Mail Fraud and Wire Fraud, one count of Securities Fraud and one count of Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering. The trial began on April 11, 2006, and was presided over by U.S. District Judge Robert C. Jones. Evidence presented at trial showed that beginning not later than January 1993, DIANA LEE FLAHERTY combined and conspired with her late husband, Robert F. Flaherty, to promote and sell securities issued by Robert F. & Diana Lee Flaherty, Inc., and Phoenix Metals U.S.A. II, Inc., Nevada corporations controlled and managed by the Flahertys. During the period from 1993 to 1994, the Flahertys promoted and sold "Ore Purchase Agreements" issued by Flaherty, Inc. To induce investors to purchase these securities, the Flahertys represented that they possessed proprietary technology that enabled them to profitably extract gold, platinum, and other precious metals from volcanic cinders, and claimed that they owned vast reserves of such cinders. The Flahertys promised to process the purported "ore" purchased by investors—typically at a rate of $1,000 per ton—and guaranteed a 300% return. In 1993, Robert and DIANA FLAHERTY acquired control of a publicly traded corporation through a reverse-merger which they thereafter renamed Phoenix Metals U.S.A. II, Inc. As part of this transaction, the Flahertys purported to transfer proprietary technology and millions of dollars of cinders to Phoenix Metals. Over the ensuing years, the Flahertys inflated Phoenix Metals’ assets and value by purporting to assign over $2,600,000,000 of additional cinder "ore" to the corporation in exchange for millions of shares of stock. From 1993 through 2002, Robert and DIANA FLAHERTY actively promoted Phoenix Metals and sold millions of shares of their stock by making and causing others to make representations to the effect that volcanic cinders contain concentrations of gold, platinum, and other precious metals; that the Flahertys and their corporations owned or controlled vast reserves of such cinders; that the Flahertys and their corporations also possessed proprietary technology capable of extracting precious metals from cinders on a commercially viable basis; and that production of precious metals had begun or was imminent. According to evidence presented at trial, these representations were untrue. In September 1997, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought a civil suit against Robert F. Flaherty and Phoenix Metals alleging essentially the same fraudulent conduct as was charged in the Indictment. In January 1998, a Judgment was entered against Robert F. Flaherty and Phoenix Metals permanently enjoining them from making false statements and engaging in fraudulent business practices regarding the sale of securities. Despite the entry of this judgment, Robert F. Flaherty and DIANA LEE FLAHERTY continued to promote and sell the stock of Phoenix Metals. Indeed, rather than abandoning their fraudulent scheme, during the pendency of the SEC investigation, the Flahertys acquired a refinery on a mill-site situated on public lands near Searchlight, Nevada. The Flahertys hosted a "Grand Opening" at this mill-site in March 1998 where they displayed precious metals purportedly extracted through their purported process, and disseminated financial statements representing that Phoenix Metal's assets were valued at almost three billion dollars. In 1998, the Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") began an investigation to determine whether Phoenix Metals was using the public lands for purposes consistent with the mill site claim. In August 2001, following a lengthy administrative process, the U.S. Department of Interior found that Phoenix Metal's mill site claim should be revoked because their purported technique for extracting precious metals from volcanic cinders had no scientific or technological validity and the cinders contained no valuable mineral content. Robert Flaherty died in December 2001, and despite the corporation's expulsion from public lands and its inability to extract or produce precious metals, DIANA LEE FLAHERTY and co-defendant MICHAEL GARDINER perpetuated the "gold from cinders" scheme and continued to make material misrepresentations regarding Phoenix Metals’ assets and capabilities in an effort to sell shares of that corporation’s stock through January 2002. Defendant FLAHERTY expended proceeds from the sale of securities on a variety of personal expenses and luxuries including acquiring luxury automobiles, servicing the mortgage on her residence in the Lakes Estates in Las Vegas, and maintaining a lavish lifestyle. DIANA FLAHERTY was arrested at her home in Las Vegas on Wednesday, March 3, 2004. She was on bail pending trial. After the verdict was entered, she was detained pending sentencing. FLAHERTY is scheduled to be sentenced on July 24, 2006, at 1:30 p.m. She faces a 12-year to 18-year period of imprisonment on the counts. She also faces forfeiture of $5,775,000. A co-defendant, MICHAEL GARDINER, pled guilty to securities fraud on March 28, 2006 and is set for sentencing on June 26, 2006 at 2:30 p.m. This case was investigated by Special Agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Bureau of Land Management, and was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Timothy S. Vasquez. Mark Faulk And Timothy Vasquez Chat. In an unusual side note to this story, this reporter had conversations with Assistant United States Attorney Timothy S. Vasquez as early as September of 2006, prior to the hearing where Diana Lee Flaherty was first released on bail. I was conducting research for the book "The Naked Truth – Counterfeiting the American Dream", which tells the story of CMKX, and includes information on both John Edwards and Diana Lee Flaherty. I informed Vasquez that Flaherty’s attorney Sherwood Cook, who helped to secure her release, was the same attorney who signed on most of John Edwards’ fraudulent trading accounts at NevWest. He informed me that the SEC hadn’t made any of that information available to him for use in the Flaherty case. I also told him that Edwards and Flaherty had ties to China, and that if released, that if released she and Edwards would most likely flee the country. Vasquez told me "that’s what I tried to tell the judge, but they limited my ability to introduce evidence about it". www.faulkingtruth.com/Articles/Investing101/1079.htmlDaniel Bogdon on why he was fired: What do you think happened? I have a much better idea now, and I have my suspicions. But I don’t want to talk about it. Now that there’s a special prosecutor, this thing is in an investigative stage. www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/oct/20/six-questions-daniel-bogden/ Sherwood Cook. State of Nevada, Deputy Secretary of State, 1987 - 1990 www.rlbolick.com/Bio/SherwoodCook.aspwww.nytimes.com/2009/08/01/us/politics/01attorney.htmlFamiliar Face Reappears for Key Role in Nevada By STEVE FRIESS Published: July 31, 2009 LAS VEGAS — President Obama on Friday nominated one of the nine federal prosecutors controversially fired by the Bush administration to retake his old job. The renomination of the former United States attorney, Daniel G. Bogden, to the post for Nevada, came at the urging of Senator Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada and the majority leader. Mr. Reid said in a statement that he supported Mr. Bogden because he was “a highly qualified and skilled lawyer who served Nevada well before being wrongly removed from office.” Mr. Reid’s spokesman, Jon Summers, said the senator was “trying to right that wrong.” The nomination provides an intriguing postscript to a controversy that erupted in 2006 when President George W. Bush, on the advice of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, fired nine United States attorneys. The inspector general of the Justice Department called the firings “unsystematic” and “arbitrary.” Mr. Gonzales resigned in late 2007. While some of the United States attorneys fired in 2006 complained that they lost their jobs in a political purge because they resisted efforts by Republican lawmakers to encourage or discourage certain prosecutions, no explanation emerged as to why Mr. Bogden specifically had lost his job. As recently as 2005, he had been praised for his “outstanding work” in a letter to Mr. Gonzales from Mary Beth Buchanan, the director of the Executive Office of United States Attorneys. Nevada legal and political circles buzzed Friday about the decision. Some Democrats and legal experts were surprised because Mr. Bush appointed Mr. Bogden in 2001. “We just don’t understand, why him?” asked F. Travis Buchanan, president of the Las Vegas chapter of the National Bar Association, an organization of black lawyers that expressed concerns about the lack of diversity in the United States attorney’s office during Mr. Bogden’s tenure. “Who else was considered? If no one else was considered, why wasn’t anyone else considered?” Mr. Buchanan said his group was drafting a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee expressing reservations about Mr. Bogden. Mr. Bogden could not be reached for comment on Friday. Part of Mr. Reid’s calculation may be that the senator faces re-election in 2010 and has sagging approval ratings within the state. “What he’s trying to do, to the absolute outrage of the liberal base, is to portray himself as a centrist,” said Steve Sebelius, editor of the alternative weekly newspaper Las Vegas CityLife. “The arc of Harry Reid has been toward the center, especially when it comes to election years.” Senator John Ensign, Republican of Nevada, also said he supported the nomination. Mr. Bogden’s most significant case was the successful conviction of four former Clark County commissioners in a scandal known as G-Sting because it involved the defendants accepting or facilitating bribes from the owner of a Las Vegas strip club. The White House also announced other attorney nominees: Deborah K. Gilg for Nebraska, Peter F. Neronha for Rhode Island and Timothy J. Heaphy for a district in Virginia. ty joye cmkmgrapevine.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=info&action=display&thread=1032 LESLIE HAKALA, SEC ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT ATTORNEY, FAILS TO ACCOUNT FOR 362 BILLION UNREGISTERED/RESTRICTED SHARES AND FAILS TO INCLUDE D. ROGER GLENN IN CIVIL ACTION No. 08- CV 0437, 4-7-08, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA SEC Enforcement Attorney, Leslie Hakala (LH), alleges in said civil action that from January 2003 to May 2005, CMKM improperly issues up to 622 billion purportedly registered/unrestricted CMKM shares. From March 2003 through May 2005, using approximately 34 different brokerage accounts at NevWest Securities Corporation (NevWest), John Edwards (JE) sells almost 260 billion shares of the purportedly 622 billion registered/unrestricted CMKM shares. That leaves approximately 362 billion purportedly registered/unrestricted CMKM shares that LH fails to account for in said civil action. A source familiar with the civil action discloses that JE was the only defendant who utilized accounts at NevWest to sell his unregistered/restricted shares. LH obviously can't account for those 362 billion purportedly registered/unrestricted CMKM shares without implicating the larger securities firms such as Knight Trading Group, Ameritrade, E*Trade, and Jeffries and Company. Furthermore, NevWest is not a self-clearing firm. Instead, it must clear its certs through clearing firms such as Wells Fargo and Dain Rauscher that have a contractual relationship with DTC. Although Brian Dvorak is the only attorney that the SEC mentions in the civil action as having written attorney opinion letters, the source discloses that he viewed attorney opinion letters pertaining to the issuing and selling of unregistered/restricted CMKM shares that were written by D. Roger Glenn, a former SEC attorney, and Sherwood N. Cook, a former Nevada Deputy Secretary of State for Securities. The source discloses that the SEC was notified about the suspicious activities regarding CMKM but failed to respond. QUESTIONS Why did the SEC in general and Leslie Hakala in particular fail to account for the aforementioned 362 billion unregistered/restricted shares? Why did the SEC in general and Leslie Hakala in particular fail to include D. Roger Glenn in said civil action? Why has the SEC failed to refer any of the defendants to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution? END OF QUESTIONS SEC ALLOWS CMKM FOUNDER, URBAN CASAVANT, AND CMKM INSIDERS TO ILLEGALLY ISSUE AND SELL 662 BILLION UNREGISTERED/RESTRICTED CMKM SHARES From August 2003 to April 2005, the average trading volume in CMKM was about 20xs more than it was the previous eight months. A fax dated 5-26-03, from Lindsey S. McCarthy (LSM), staff attorney for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), to Transfer Agent, 1st Global Stock Transfer (1GST), that mentions James Kinney (JK), a Defendant in the subsequent Civil Action No. 08- CV 0437 of 4-7-08, United States District Court for the District of Nevada, proves that the SEC was aware of JK's suspicious activities pertaining to CMKM five years BEFORE filing said civil action against him. QUESTIONS Why did the SEC fail to investigate the huge increase in volume in CMKM stock? Why did the SEC fail to follow up on James Kinney's' suspicious activities? END OF QUESTIONS SEC FOIA DEPARTMENT UNJUSTLT DENIES FOIA REQUESTS SUBMITTED BY CMKM SHAREHOLDERS, AND THEN WHEN IT IS FORCED TO RELEASE THE DEPOSITIONS, IT UNDERHANDEDLY AND PURPOSELY BLOTS OUT INFORMATION THAT MAKES THE DEPOSITIONS UNINTELLIGIBLE In March, 2009, in a concerted effort to discover the truth, CMKM shareholders submit FOIA Requests for depositions of D. Roger Glenn, Donald Stoecklein, Robert Maheu, and Bill Frizzell. The SEC unjustly denies the FOIA Requests under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A): Compiled for law enforcement purposes, the release of which could reasonably be expected to interfere with law enforcement proceedings. The FOIA Requestors have filed Administrative Appeals. The SEC Office of the General Counsel has subsequently determined the depositions can be released under the FOIA Request. The honorable Senator John Ensign has contacted the SEC on behalf of a CMKM shareholder. In a 6-11-09 letter to Senator Ensign, Ollie R. Wade, SEC FOIA/Privacy Act Research Specialist, writes that "We will send these records electronically directly..." On 6-15-09, Ollie R. Wade emailed the two despositions of D. Roger Glenn except for attorney and third-party names, addresses, telephone and social security numbers, a date of birth, educational background, and other personal information, all of which is protected from release under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(C), 17 CFR § 200.80(b)(7)(iii). The release of the personal information could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, and release of the Commission staff named in the records could subject the employees to harassment from the public in the performance of their official duties. In other words, the SEC blotted out all of the above. Because the SEC's blotting out personal information such as "addresses, telephone and social security numbers, and a date of birth" does not normally cause a deposition to be unintelligible, it is reasonable under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(C), 17 CFR § 200.80(b)(7)(iii). But the SEC underhandedly includes "attorney and third-party names," both of which causes a deposition to be unintelligible--and that of course is unconscionable and runs contrary to the very reason that the Freedom of Information Act was enacted. Furthermore, the SEC underhandedly includes an entity for whom the FOIA Exemptions does not provide: "the Commission staff named in the records could subject the employees to harassment from the public in the performance of their official duties." QUESTIONS Are "attorney and third-party names" protected under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(C), 17 CFR § 200.80(b)(7)(iii)? If so, give details. Is "the Commission staff named in the records" protected under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(C), 17 CFR § 200.80(b)(7)(iii)? If so, give details. Why would the "Commission staff named in the records" be subject to "harassment from the public in the performance of their official duties" if said person was performing his/her prescribed duties which are to oversee the securities markets, to enforce the federal securities laws, and to protect investors? Have all SEC employees read and are all SEC employees adhering to President Obama's instructions in his January 21, 2009, FOIA Memorandum? "The Government should not keep information confidential merely because it might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears." END OF QUESTIONS D. ROGER GLENN DEPOSITIONS, 7-19-06 AND 10-23-07. In said depositions, D. Roger Glenn alleges that he was unaware of the pump and dump scam and that he relied on the information that Brian Dvorak presented him for writing his opinion letters. Two possibilities exist: 1. D. Roger Glenn is telling the truth which means he was grossly negligent for failing to check out the information himself BEFORE writing his opinion letters. Of course that points toward his being completely incompetent; or 2. D. Roger Glenn is lying and was part of the pump and dump scam. QUESTION Why did Leslie Hakala fail to include D. Roger Glenn in Civil Action No. 08- CV 0437, 4-7-08, United States District Court for the District of Nevada? Thank you, Robert NASD ALLOWS JEFFERIES AND COMPANY TO ILLEGALLY NAKED SHORT 111 BILLION SHARES OF CMKM STOCK In the "Jefferies Letter," dated 5-6-05, Cathleen Shine, Deputy General Counsel for Jefferies and Company (Jefferies), responds to requests from Ms. Anne Dansard Glowacki, NASD, concerning Jefferies' failure to report certain trades in CMKM in 3-04. According to the "Jeffferies Letter," the trades, amounting to 111 billion CMKM shares, involves "two broker dealer customers of Jefferies" who requested that trades in CMKM be settled "Ex-Clearing," which are trades that are cleared outside a clearing house and therefore are unreported. That is tantamount to the "two broker dealer customers" requesting that Jefferies allow them to illegally naked short 111 billion CMKM shares. According to the "Jeffferies Letter," Jefferies "made a business and operational risk decision to allow a limited number of broker dealer customers who were long sellers of CMKX to settle the trades "Ex-Clearing."" That is tantamount to Jeffries confessing that it made "a business and operational risk decision to allow a limited number of broker dealer customers to" illegally naked short 111 billion CMKM shares. In Civil Action No. 08- CV 0437, 4-7-08, United States District Court for the District of Nevada, page 3, Leslie Hakala alleges that "To divert attention from their own dumping of CMK shares, Casavant persuaded CMKM's investors that the reported high trading volume in CMK stock reflected extensive "naked short sellng" rather than ordinary stock dilution." QUESTIONS Were/Are the SEC in general and Leslie Hakala in particular aware of the "Jefferies Letter" on or before the writing of said civil action? If not, are the SEC in general and Leslie Hakala in particular grossly negligent? If so, how could Leslie Hakala have possibly alleged "high trading volume in CMK stock reflected extensive "naked short sellng" rather than ordinary stock dilution?" END OF QUESTIONS THE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARANCE OF CMKM'S IMMENSELY VALUABLE 1.9 MILLION ACRES OF MINING CLAIMS IN THE FORT A LA CORNE AREA OF CENTRAL SASKATCHEWAN On 5-16-05, CMKM announces in a PR that it possesses the drilling report prepared by William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project. The drilling report was commissioned for CMKM by 101047025 Saskatchewan Ltd. Mr. Jarvis was asked to report on and make recommendations for the kimberlite exploration program. The scope of work completed includes: 1. a review of the Geological setting as it relates to kimberlite and diamond exploration; 2. an examination of the geological and data provided by the CMKM; 3. a review of published geological reports and maps; 4. a visit to the area of the concession. The following are excerpts from Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project: "Drilling results and additional ground magnetic and gravity surveys have shown the best known kimberlite bodies to be bedded, and to have a very different shape from most known kimberlite bodies. In most of the well-known diamond mines in Africa, for example, and in those in the NWT in Canada, the upper portions of the kimberlites bodies have been eroded, leaving only the feeder pipe, which has a "carrot" shape, getting smaller in diameter with depth. However, in the Fort à la Corne swarm, the tops of the kimberlitic volcanic edifices are COMPLETELY PRESERVED [emphasis added by author], and they are shaped more or less like a soup bowl, with two larger horizontal dimensions, and one smaller vertical dimension. Several of these have an inferred geological resource (based on a few holes and on geophysical modeling) in excess of 100 million tonnes, one has nearly a billion tons, and one group of five which are close together, or perhaps coalescing, contain about 2 billion tons of kimberlite. There are thus HUGE VOLUMES OF KIMBERLINE WITHIN A FEW HUNDRED METRES OF THE SURFACE." [emphasis added by author] "The Fort à la Corne swarm of kimberlitic bodies is the LARGEST SWARM KNOWN IN THE WORLD [emphasis added by author], and some of the bodies are the LARGEST KNOWN SUCH BODIES IN THE WORLD." [emphasis added by author] On 6-24-09, the SEC filed "Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant John Edwards (#991), Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant Daryl Anderson (#102), and Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants Kathleen and Anthony Tomasso pursuant to Civil Action No. 08- CV 0437, 4-7-08, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. On page 3 of said Motion for Summary Judgment, the SEC alleges "CMKM provided investors with phony maps and fabricated videos of alleged mineral claims in North and South America." QUESTIONS Is Leslie Hakala or whoever wrote the said Motion for Summary Judgment aware of the Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project? If so, is Leslie Hakala or whoever wrote said Motion for Summary Judgment also referring to the Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project "phony" or "fabricated?" If so, is Leslie Hakala or whoever wrote said Motion for Summary Judgment also referring to N. Ralph Newson, M.Sc., P. Eng., P.Geo. as "phony?" If not, why is Leslie Hakala or whoever wrote said Motion for Summary Judgment unaware of the Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project? If Leslie Hakala or whoever wrote said Motion for Summary Judgment is unaware of the Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project, could that be construed as gross incompetence and negligence? Thank you, Robert
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Apr 16, 2012 21:07:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Apr 16, 2012 21:46:05 GMT -5
By: king1000 16 Apr 2012, 03:01 PM CDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 1079932 of 1080011 (Reply to 1079606 by king1000) Jump to msg. # GIVEN OUR OWN CEO IS BACKING THE AG MOVEMENT AND EVERYONE ELSE WHO TOOK PROACTIVE ACTIONS TO GET THE TRUTH BY HIS ACTIONS, I WOULD HOPE EVERYONE WHO TOOK THAT PROACTIVE ACTION TAKES ONE MORE AND EMAILS THE NEVADA FBI AND ASKS THEM TO CONTACT OUR CEO. MR. KIRKPATRICK HAS TAKEN ACTIONS THAT MARK FAULK SHOULD HAVE, BILL FRIZZELL SHOULD HAVE, AND KEVIN WEST SHOULD HAVE. IT IS TIME THE SHAREHOLDERS SUPPORTED HIM AND HELPED BRING CLOSURE TO THIS SITUATION WE ARE STUCK IN. EMAIL THE FBI AND DEMAND THEY DUE THEIR DUTY, IF THEY HAD TO THIS WOULD BE OVER: william.woerner@ic.fbi.gov lasvegas@ic.fbi.gov David: I called Mr. Woerner at the Las Vegas FBI office as promised. I spoke to his secretary - he is out of town until next week. I explained who I was and why I was calling. Let's see if he returns my call next week. Steve K Sent from my iPhone On Apr 4, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Gus Jarvis wrote: Thanks, you can talk to William Woerner or Jerald Burkin. Either is familiar with the situation. Given they have admitted they are investigating, it is their legal duty to investigate your Rico fraud evidence. The attorney for Ginger Guteirrez forwarded the email I just sent you to Timothy Vasquez. He has indicted her and at the same time not indicted the brokers who committed massive Rico fraud. This is really a slam dunk, there is no getting around the fact the sec and doj and fbi have engaged in a massive coverup in this case. Sent from my iPhone On 2012-04-04, at 1:53 PM, "Steve Kirkpatrick" wrote: Dave: I will indeed attempt to contact Mr. Woerner tomorrow. Steve K Original Message-----From: Gus Jarvis [mailto:cmkxshareholderscoalition@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 3:50 PM To: steve k Subject: Mr. Kirkpatrick The FBI is investigating themselves right now in the cmkx case for covering up the fraud of the brokers. You have that evidence which corroborates that fact. Are you going to contact William Woerner of the FBI and give him that evidence. It would quickly bring closure to this situation IMO. Thanks Dave ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=1079932
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Apr 16, 2012 21:59:36 GMT -5
April 16, 2012 Re: Company Meeting/Webinars
TO ALL CMKM SHAREHOLDERS: I am happy to announce that our first CMKM Diamonds, Inc. online company meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 19, 2012 at 8 P. M. CDT. The meeting can be joined either by computer, or by phone, and will be available to the first 1,000 shareholders that sign up to attend.
The audio of the meeting will be recorded and archived on the company website for future listening.
Webex is issuing a new URL to me hopefully by tomorrow morning, and at that time I will post a hyperlink on this website which will allow you to sign up for the meeting, and will provide details as to how to attend the meeting.
Shareholders will be able to listen to audio, view video (via computer), and type questions or comments as the meeting is being held. I will make a general statement at the beginning of the meeting, and then attempt to answer as many questions as the time allows.
Please monitor the CMKM website for additional details and the hyperlink. I am excited about these meetings, and hope they prove to be of great benefit to all shareholders and the company. Take care, and God bless….
Steve Kirkpatrick
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Apr 20, 2012 0:12:37 GMT -5
Frizzell Update: Sept 30, 2005 Greetings Group Members, I have received several emails of late inquiring about our naked short investigation. We have continued to tally shares by people that have sent their statements to us but the numbers are not changing significantly. We proved a huge naked short position in this company a long time ago. Our documentation substantiates 482 billion shares (approximately) owned by 11557 shareholders. This does not include cert holders. There remains approximately 48000 shareholders that have not sent us their holdings. By my estimates there are at least a trillion and a half shares that have been sold in CMKX stock. When all shares (including foreign and obo accounts) are added to the mix, the total could exceed two trillion shares. Have a good weekend. Onward, Bill www.wallstreetweb.nl/community/viewtopic.php?p=67867&sid=c198fb2e12303afb766aa80bd0e4bd9a
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Apr 20, 2012 10:10:19 GMT -5
And NOW For The REST Of The Story! « Thread Started Today at 10:04am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I sat and listened to the Steve Kilpatrick Webinar session last night along with hundreds of other shareholders. The more I listened to Steve's monologue, the more fustrated I became. Fustrated*** being the more "polite" description of how I really felt.
Here we have a relative "newbie" shareholder feeding us a complete line of useless BS. He stated he became a SH in 2010, by buying 2 mil shares from a friend. He came into the big picture late, not knowing of what he was getting himself into. Not having edured the long wait, as the rest of us have. Not witnessing the PR's, billboard signs of "GOT CMKX" at Nascar races, sponsoring NHRA drag racing promotions, core sample testing, the wheeling and dealing of land claims, legal battles, hands-on handling company business by one Robert Maheu, etc etc etc.
He knows nothng of the CMKX/CMKM Diamonds history, but we shareholders of old, do. Sitting there speaking to us like we all just crawled out from under a rock and were complete idiots, was a hard slap in the face to us. To think that he has all the answers to correct the problems with the company, is shear stupidity on HIS part! IMHO.
I heard him repeatedly praise Bill Frizzel, WHAT has Frizzel EVER done for the shareholders?? Besides chastise the shareholders, tell them "it is none of your business" ? It is very apparent to this writer/shareholder that Mr. Kilpatrick was groomed and prepared by Frizzell before he started.
Mr. Kilpatrick, IMHO, your best bet, is either to drop the act OR get yourself up to speed on the actual history of CMKX. Get a grip on yourself, OR you just may get to face a group of extremely angry shareholders us close and personal and get an education of a lifetime on etiquete shareholder relationship. YOU chose to stick your nose into something you knew nothing about, so YOU will suffer the wrath you have started.
I don't mean to sound threatening, but just mean to show you, that you have angered a sleeping giant of a shareholder base. I don't really think you understand what you have gotten yourself into at this time and point in history. Ya know, if you keep jabbing at a hornet's nest, you are bound to get stung, and these angry/fustrated shareholders will eat you alive.
Some of the things you stated last night, were simply lies. Don't lie to the SH base, it won't get you anywhere, especially with the majority having lived thru the entire saga, day to day as a fairly close knit group.
Again, IMHO, your best bet is to simply tell Bill Frizzel, you are not needed. Forget you ever got involved, find yourself anothe hobby. Focus your attention on your car wash equipment business, maybe you will succeed at that. Leave the shareholders alone, we are doing just fine without your so called "help".
regards, "Flyer
|
|
|
Post by gotcmkxdiamonds on Apr 20, 2012 13:38:14 GMT -5
AMEN GOOD POST
|
|
|
Post by gotcmkxdiamonds on Apr 20, 2012 13:40:38 GMT -5
IMHO THIS IS ABOUT AL AND THE TRUST. I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE ON WITH SOME MONEY. AL IS THE ONLY HOPE WE HAVE.
ANOTHER PENNY INTO THIS COMPANY I WILL NOT SPEND. THE MAN IS SPINNING HIS WHEELS.
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Apr 21, 2012 23:12:36 GMT -5
It is clear that even after being warned they were either directly selling unregistered shares in CMKX stock, or facilitating the sales of billions of unregistered shares, TD continued to sell billions of shares in CMKX. In fact many other firms in Canada continued to sell billions of shares in CMKX stock with the SEC watching very closely. SEC Deposition of Attorney Bill Frizzell: From Page 150 of transcript of 01/06/2006 deposition (link to transcript at bottom of post): Leslie Hakala: Do you believe the stock of CMKM Diamonds have been subject to significant naked short selling? Attorney Bill Frizzell: Absolutely. Leslie Hakala: Who first told you that? Attorney Bill Frizzell: Nobody first told me. I made that decision myself when I pulled 12,000 broker statements from shareholders. I know based on the NOBO list and based on at that time the cert list from the transfer agent there was already over 50 billion shorted shares just by the information we have from just the NOBO list and the cert list from the transfer agent back in June (2005). There was [sic] 50 billion shorted shares. Bill Frizzell to sec: “We also found out when we did that broker statement faxing back in the summer that your NOBO list does not contain all the shareholders. It does not contain most of the foreign exchanges or the foreign stocks. T.D. Waterhouse doesn’t even show up on the NOBO list, T.D. Waterhouse Canada. There are Canadian brokerages that are not listed on there. We knew this because we would see broker statements. We’d go to the NOBO list. It’s not on there and it’s not on the cert list from the company.” “We would find out that it was through some weird broker out there in never never land that either doesn’t report through the DTCC or does not go through the traditional reporting channels that are picked up by ADP. So we know that you can’t just say we’ll get the NOBO list and add in the cert list from the TA and that’s out shareholder list. We know that’s not accurate.” Source: Transcript of Deposition dated 01/06/2006 - Page # 112. Mr. Frizzell says never never land, but in fact in evidence entered to the RCMP and others we know that it wasn’t never never land, it was fraud. Here is from EagleTech’s Rod Young, commenting on Canadian firms, letter attached: 8 The New York State Supreme Court granted Eagletech its DTC and NSCC trading records. The unprecedented ruling denied the DTCC’s request for a protective order. NSCC CNS (Continuous Net Settlement) Reports confirm that those short sales failed delivery for 252 trading days (one calendar year), making them illegal Naked Short Sales. 9 DTC participant 5099 reportedly a secret account at the CDS (Canadian Depository for Securities, the CDS is a subsidiary of the DTCC) failed delivery for 212 days. DTC Participant account 5099 is reportedly a special account that clear(s)(ed) through Euroclear for seven Canadian brokerages: Thompson Kernaghan, Wolverton Securities, Global Securities, Pacific International, Canacord Capital, Yorkton Securities, Research Capital, with now defunct TK being replaced by TD Waterhouse. Also it is clear from quotes from the largest class action in history, cmkx.info/Hodges-3.87Trillion-Bivens-Lawsuit.pdf, that not only did the SEC facilitate the sale of hundreds of billions of illegal shares in CMKX, they also knew that no Canadian brokers and other foreign brokers were not even on the NOBO lists, they were all selling unregistered shares in other words: 31. During the period of June 1, 2004 through October 28, 2005 a total of 2.25 Trillion “phantom” shares of CMKM Diamonds Inc, was sold into the public market through legitimate brokers, illegitimate brokers and dealers, market makers, hedge funds, ex-clearing transactions and private transactions. The sales of the majority of such shares were at all times known to the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Defendants herein. 20. From March 17, 2005 through April 29, 2005 CMKM traded publicly in the US under the trading symbol “CMKX,” a total of 551,756,751,833 shares, an average share volume of more than 17 billion shares per day, reaching a maximum on April 21, 2005 of 94,654,588,201 shares. These figures do not include foreign trades nor trades made on an ex-clearing basis such as those disclosed by Jefferies & Company , Inc. on May 6, 2005: between March 25, 2004 and September 21, 2004 Jefferies traded 111,780,681,204 shares of CMKX stock on an ex-clearing basis. So the question the coalition has to IIROC is how TD Waterhouse obtained a certificate for me, as I have a registered certificate with the transfer agent of CMKM Diamonds Inc. None of the shares TD sold me were registered, and since the company did not allow firms to buy shares after it was revoked, how did they get a certificate for me, what transaction happened to allow that, and why it is not made public. Some shareholders I represent had to wait months on end to get their certs, and then finally did, indicating a transaction took place. The evidence is clear that TD Waterhouse and other Canadian brokers paid for the certificates they produced given all shares sold in Canada were not even on the NOBO lists, so had to be unregistered. Evidence of this is also given by Mr. Al Hodges in his Bivens class action and in particular in his court testimony on Aug. 2nd in California. In court that day, Mr. Hodges claimed that TD Waterhouse was one of the perpetrators who victimized CMKM shareholders and their company, he also claimed that he had a witness to the fact that TD Waterhouse paid for their crimes. He stated that TD Waterhouse paid into a trust fund for the shareholders who were sold illegal shares. He also said that the trust fund those monies were paid into were suppose to be released to the shareholders of CMKX four years ago. Here is a transcript, which is available upon request, was Mr. Hodges identifies TD Waterhouse: “AH: As I started to say, here is the simple answer, your Honor, as I started to say a few minutes ago and I probably did not finish. The original agreement, there was a war that ensued after the sting got under operation because what the sting always contemplated was that Mr. Maheu would collect all of these bad doers, the hedge fund people and people like T.D. Waterhouse and all the other stock brokerage houses around who were naked shorting this company, collect them all in a big room and offer them a deal for two reasons. First of all to collect money for CMKX for what had been done to them, and second of all to teach these people a lesson that there were people out there watching what was going on. Hopefully that would head them off from continuing in such illicit and illegal and improper behaviour. That was in fact done and I have a witness that was there when it was done. They had a room about three times the size of your courtroom in which they had representative from all of these brokerages from all over the world. They watched a video presentation, because Mr. Maheu, as the court may be aware, was at one time closely associated with the CIA, Howard Hughes and all kinds of other people. Judge: I was going to ask you whether that was the same Bob Maheu. AH: It is indeed the same one, a gentleman I happened to make acquaintances within the 70’s to my good fortune. At any rate all of these people were in this room and were shown a video and a slide presentation of all of the evidence of their wrongdoing and they were offered an opportunity to either step up and sign away your money and pay a reasonable amount for each transaction you did illegally and improperly or go walk out of here and get prosecuted and go to jail because what you did was criminal. Every single person in that room stepped up and made a deal. After that time there became a big conflict between the SEC commissioners and the other governmental entities who were supporting the SEC commissioners about who was going to have the right to release this money to the shareholders and when, My understanding is that it went on for some number of months but ultimately the SEC commissioners prevailed and convinced Mr. Maheu and his associates that it had to be their decision because only they and the rest of the government could determine when this sting had fulfilled its function. That was the basis on which he gave them the power to make this decision about when the money is to be released. It is my understanding that every trust that is currently being held for release of this money is being held by a person who is sworn to observe that requirement. That the SEC, the US government whoever is to make this payment, goes first. Since my information is that was the SEC commissioners that have this power, this is why they are the defendants in this case.” AH: this money was supposed to have been released within a year of the time the company was originally de-listed in October of 2005. This is now almost October of 2010, some 4 years past that time. It is taking only because they refuse, not withstanding information they have continued to give to the shareholders, they continue to refuse to release this money. If they don’t release they money then it is a taking. Because they are preventing what is rightfully ours for us to receive. That is why it is a taking. To this day the money paid by TD Waterhouse has not been released to the shareholders, despite endless promises by officials in the United States to do so. Shareholders in Canada have been damaged by Canadian firms like TD Waterhouse, those firms paid into a fund to allow them to escape criminal indictments, now those Canadian shareholders are being damaged by the very authorities which are suppose to protect them as they will not release that money. In fact, Mr. Hodges, who is a direct party to the proceedings, claims that several international crimes are being committed which prevent the conclusion of his Bivens case, which means those crimes are preventing the lawful distribution of monies collected by Canadian firms who IIROC overseas. The Coalition asks that IIROC conduct an immediate investigation into the status update of the money TD Waterhouse and other Canadian firms paid into trust for the damage they inflicted on CMKX shareholders. Correspondence and allegations Mr. Hodges has made have already been entered into evidence to the RCMP and Mr. Vic Toews, and can be found here, it includes a recent history of allegations made by Mr. Hodges and a direct time line of the crimes currently happening to all CMKX shareholders and all Canadian firms your organization overseas that paid into the fund mentioned: cmkx.info/CMKX--To%20Whom%20it%20....ders%20use.pdf. To update the IIROC as to current events the Coalition presents the latest update to all shareholders, again this should be an update sent to TD Waterhouse and others, as it is their money Mr. Hodges is referring to here: As all are by now well aware, we have been battling a serious headwind, obtaining Economic Receipt. Although I have previously stated that I would not provide an “update” until we had confirmation of economic receipt or, I became convinced that payment to CMKX shareholders would not be forthcoming in a timely manner, I believe a further update is called for due to the status of the CMKX litigation and due to the unreasonable length of time resolution is taking. Please be advised as follows: • As previously indicated, the August 2 Court hearing was utilized, in part, as a means of conveying to the Judge and to the defendants, some of the additional information which could be added to the originally filed Complaint; this information has now been included in a First Amended Complaint which, out of an abundance of caution, has been filed and served today, September 16, 2010. We will continue to aggressively pursue this matter until such time as all shareholders have been paid. • It has been a very unreasonable period of time since we first began this litigation. Shortly after filing the original Complaint, I advised you of my opinion that resolution was imminent. I am confident that many of you are now convinced that I either don’t know the meaning of that word or am certifiably non compos mentis. Unfortunately, neither is the explanation; in point of fact we, and many others involved in bringing this matter to resolution, have been consistently lied to and ‘played’ by our own government. I do remain convinced that we will prevail. I know that the SEC is anxious for this to be over; however, it is not particularly the SEC that has held things up, IMO. We are, like it or not, tied to the World Global Settlements payouts. Until that process has been concluded, I do not believe that you will receive your payment. As always, inquiring minds want to know: what is our status; what has been going on; what is holding up economic receipt; when will our money be released; etc. etc.? I will try to address some of these concerns, to the extent I am able, separately: 1. Our Status – Our status remains pretty much the same as before. We remain literally on the thresh-hold. This means that the “work” remaining to be finished will not consume more hours than can be accomplished within one day; we have been at this point now for way too many months. However, progress in consummating the World Global Settlements has been made, which is a substantial improvement. I have now been advised that nearly all of the BASEL list items [some 20 in number] have been paid out; only one or two items remain IMO. 2. When is Release – The CMKX distribution funds will be released within a very short time after there is confirmation of Economic Receipt. What does that mean? There is in process a massive shift of wealth within the US and the world community which includes: pay-out of all the domestic prosperity settlements; institution of the US dollar re-funding project; pay-out of world settlements; and, distribution of funds to many other programs. This involves a total of more than $42 Trillion. Economic Receipt occurs when all trustees have access to all of the funds they are responsible for. When the last BASEL item is paid, we will have ER and the CMKX trustees can begin distribution, IMO. 3. Goings On – What’s been going on behind the scenes is a war. As I said before, there is an economic war raging in the background; this war is between those who have controlled this planet for the last hundred and fifty years, and we who think that it must stop. It is a war which, as much due to world circumstance as anything else IMHO, we seem slowly, inexorably winning. Because the naked corruption in D.C. is so endemic, it takes time. These miscreants are, in effect, fighting for their lives – at least that part of their lives that secures an environment in which they can continue to lie, cheat, steal, and mortgage your progeny’s lives, all for their personal gain. Accordingly, they will fight until the doors are all closed by a power that they cannot subvert. The good news is, we are winning the battle. 4. When - When will it be over, you ask; when will we get paid? I have suggested dates in the past, each of which was based upon information that I had received from the people on the scene and in the trenches. I am unwilling at this point to say anything more than I believe it will be soon: 1) because of the status of the World Global Settlements; 2) because I have received anecdotal information regarding movement of CMKX funds; and 3) because of additional information received concerning the status other related payments being made. I again want to extend my heartfelt thanks to those of you who continue to demonstrate support and encouragement for our efforts; I am especially thankful for all of the IM good wishes and thank-you’s. I remain very optimistic for the long term; rest assured that the fight will continue until we succeed. We will prevail! Given Mr. Hodges says in this update that TD Waterhouse’s money will not be released to the victims until all parties have received ER in the World Settlements, it is the duty of the IIROC to investigate the allegations put forth here by Mr. Hodges in a public letter to Ben Bernanke and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve alleging they are committing RICO fraud, which is preventing the conclusion of the world settlements, and are in fact using money illegally to gain interest. It should also be IIROC’s duty to investigate why TD Waterhouse and other Canadian firm’s money paid for their crimes against CMKM shareholders is even a part of the World Settlements. A public inquiry into the allegations put forth in this letter is warranted given Mr. Hodges has intimate knowledge of what he writes about and is a direct party to the facts in this case, this letter should also be forwarded to the Honourable Stockwell Day, as he is the President of the Treasury Board
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Apr 21, 2012 23:40:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by alrich on May 9, 2012 15:41:59 GMT -5
Subject: File No. S7-08-08 From: lev hoApril 11, 2008 Who really pumped CMKX.. WHO ATTRACTED 40,000+ Shareholders Mr. Cox: WHY DID THE SEC CREATE ANTI-FRAUD REGULATION FOR NAKED SHORTING COMPANY STOCK, IF THERE IS NO COMPANY THAT IS NAKED SHORTED . IT MAKES NO SENSE SEC HAS NOT ANNOUNCED ONE COMPANY THAT HAS BEEN NSS'D SO WHY HAVE THIS REGULATION ? IT MUST HAVE HAPPENED, Do Your Job Will You.... If the SEC wants to accuse a few to cover up its own failures as a regulatory agency to protect shareholders it is a sad time in American History of how truly bad the system is. A regulatory system that thinks the American public cannot see the truth about an agency that seems to think the investing public is just plain stupid and will buy any story to COVER UP their own inefficiency as a regulatory body. Ask any shareholder what really cause them to buy and you will hear 99 out of 100 say Roger Glen and Robert Mahue... The huge trading in CMKX stock started with the hiring Of . Roger Glenn of Edwards Angell, ..and continued its record trading volume as Robert Mahue took the reins and even became a board Member.. In the June 16, 2004 Pr a quote from Roger Glenn of Edwards Angell "Glenn stated, "We have been retained by the company to resolve the problems it has been facing, and we expect to devote significant efforts immediately toward that goal. The company has advised us that it is dedicated to complying fully with all requirements on it, and we are pleased to act as counsel to it on that basis." (Let me add here, we are very aware of Mr. Glenn writing Sarbanes-Oxley). CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Announces New Transfer Agent. Quote from Roger Glen in that PR D. Roger Glenn of Edwards Angell, attorneys for CMKM Diamonds, Inc. said "The Company is proud to announce this relationship with Pacific Stock Transfer .It has a fine reputation as a transfer agent, and the Company is looking forward to working with it in the future. The Company is confident that Pacific Stock Transfer will process transactions in the Company's stock accurately and quickly. CMKM Diamonds Launches National Television Exposure and Awareness Campaign Business Wire, July 14, 2004 Roger Glen is still counsel for CMKX CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Announces Dividend to Shareholders of Record Date and Option Agreement. DENVER -- CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (Pink Sheets:CMKX) is pleased to have reached a purchase agreement with U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc. (OTC BB:UCAD UCAD - UCAD - to which U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. will be purchasing 5% of all mineral claims held by CMKM Diamonds, Inc. in exchange for 7.5 million shares of UCAD. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. will later issue these shares to all shareholders of record on August 20, 2004. Roger Glen still cousel for CMKX... Roger Glen was also counsel for U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. CMKM Diamonds, Inc., to invest in Casavant International Mining, Inc. Declares Dividend For Shareholders. 7/20/2004 AS VEGAS -- CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (Pink Sheets:CMKX) has agreed to invest US$1,000,000 in Casavant International Mining referred to as (CIM). CMKM Diamonds,Inc. will receive in return a 10% lifetime royalty on all mineral claims of CIM , specifically including the George Lake Zinc Deposit, (http://www.ir.gov.sk.ca/dbsearch/MinDepositQuery/Default.asp?ID=0663) In addition to the zinc deposit royalty CMKM Diamonds, Inc. will also receive 40 billion shares of CIM stock which CMKM Diamonds, Inc. will distribute pro rata as a dividend to all CMKM shareholders of record on August 31, 2004. Roger Glen still counsel For CMKM Diamonds findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2004_July_26/ai_n6125082 Business Wire, July 26, 2004 CMKM Diamonds Inc. Acquires Additional Interests in Saskatchewan LAS VEGAS -- CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets: CMKX) announced today that it has agreed to acquire a 60%, undivided interest in 500,000 acres of potential Kimberlite mineral property in Saskatchewan, Canada. The property is currently owned by Nevada Minerals Inc., a private company unrelated to CMKM. The property is being developed by a joint venture between Nevada Minerals Inc. and U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. CMKM will acquire the interest in the property in exchange for 75 billion shares of restricted Rule 144 stock of CMKM. In order to reduce the dilution to CMKM's shareholders as a result of this transaction, Urban Casavant, CMKM's CEO, has agreed to contribute 40 billion shares owned by himself in exchange for an agreement from CMKM stating that Casavant will be paid only if the acquired property actually yields a profit. According to the agreement, Casavant will be paid one-half of the net proceeds from any mining on the property, after paying all associated expenses, up to a maximum aggregate total of US$62 million. CMKM will issue 35 billion new shares of the company to Nevada Minerals Inc. to complete the transaction. Casavant stated, "We are delighted to make the acquisition of this property, which is covered by our proprietary Goldak Airbourne surveys. We will be traveling to Saskatchewan in August with executives from U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. to view the property owned by CMKM with the intent of planning a drilling schedule." The drilling will be performed with Rick Walker and United Carina Resources Corp. (CDNX: UCA), Consolidated Pine Channel Gold Corp. (CDNX: KPG) and Shane Resources Ltd. (CDNX: SEI). D. Roger Glenn, CMKM's counsel, stated, "I will be traveling to Saskatchewan with the company's management to expand my knowledge of the company and its business in order to facilitate the company becoming fully reporting." Roger Glen still counsel for CMKX notice Quote by Roger Glebb in the above PR CMKM Diamonds Inc. Receives First $3,000,000 from UCAD Option Business Wire, July 27, 2004 LAS VEGAS -- CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets: CMKX) announced today that it has received this day $3,000,000 from U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. as the first exercise of a purchase option agreed to last week between the parties. Under the agreement reached last week, UCAD has a one-year option agreement to purchase an additional 10% interest of all mineral claims held by CMKM Diamonds Inc. for a total of $15 million U.S. dollars payable to CMKM Diamonds Inc. Urban Casavant, president of CMKX, stated, "We are thrilled that UCAD has begun exercising its option as this frees additional cash for our expanding operations and exploration. As we move toward our meeting in Saskatchewan next week with all parties involved, an action plan will be directed to the future for all." Roger Glen still cousel for CMKM Diamonds.. Notice the above mention of the meeting in Saskatchewan which Roger Glen was attending. Date: 29-JUL-04 CMKM Diamonds Inc. Purchases 25% of Juina Mining Roger Glen still counsel for CMKM Diamonds Date: August 2, 2004 CMKM Diamonds Inc. Announces Dividend of Juina Mining Shares. Roger Glen still counsel for CMKM Diamonds I CAN GO ON AND ON THE DIVIDENDS I can assume were under the direction of Roger Glen and he did attend the meeting in Saskatchewan. All the shareholders know about it with the thumbs up and all. Roger Glen increased the Authorized from 500 to 800 billion AFTER THE MEETING IN Saskatchewan. Robert A. Maheu Joins the Board of Directors of CMKM Diamonds Inc Business Wire, Jan 31, 2005 LAS VEGAS -- CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets: CMKX) is pleased to announce that Robert A. Maheu has joined the board of directors of the company. Maheu will serve as the co-chairman of the board of directors and will assist Mr. Casavant in the immediate and long-term objectives of the company. Casavant and Maheu will together be looking into the company and setting forth exactly what CMKM Diamonds needs to do in order to be successful in its current endeavors. The two look to bring in a president to the company that has successful history in geology and mining of natural resources. I will end with a quote from Mr. Mahue "We are not letting these regulatory matters impede our primary focus of creating stockholder value through the mining and development of our mineral assets," stated Mr. Maheu. CMKX is continuing to search for additional property claims in Canada and monitor its holdings in Ecuador. Let me close with this... CMKM Diamonds trading volume was huge based on what ROGER GLEN and Mr. Maheu. Stated in PR'S... If the SEC wishes to use the word PUMP in its suit and BLAME CHAT BOARDS for the huge volume in CMKX stock they are either very naive or think the American people are stupid enough to buy into it's hogwash... The volume of CMKX stock was caused by 2 very well known and respected individuals. Roger GLEN of Edwards Angell and Robert Mahue .. Neither one formally announced any issues or Deficiencies with CMKM Diamonds or Urban Casavant.. So SEC if you want to use the word PUMP for one the basis of your suit why has neither one of the two individuals mentioned been included in the suit you prepared. You (SEC) claim the stock was tainted yet thousands of brokers all of the world sold it to their clients but you chose to list only one.. It seems you have conveniently excluded the two largest sellers of CMKX STOCK in your suit, Ameritrade and Etrade. Who do you really protect large institutions or the common shareholder. I think any American can see through your agenda of brainwashing... I myself cannot get my CIM cert with one of those 2 firms mentioned.. To put it bluntly they lie and that was verified when they refused a 3 way call to the TA. Many accounts had shares of CMKX and CIM liquidated by those 2 firms mentioned claiming the stock was worthless. and claiming at times CMKM was no longer in business... We all as shareholders know that is not a true statement. If anything you as an agency should be investigated by Congress for your failure to run an organization on a level playing field without the influence of special interest groups and large financial organizations who fleece the American citizen of their hard earned money. This corruption goes much deeper then the few you accuse in your suit . Look at what is happening to the DECLINING value of the American Dollar.. We have become slaves to the very people who we pay tax dollars to protect us.. We have become debtors to your protection of special interest groups all the way up to hedge funds and Banks that hide IOU's as derivatives that they never pay back... Its just saved for the shredder when a cover up is completed.. Some say a few good people are protecting us and hopefully there a few good people in the system that will turn this around. American Investors are losing confidence in the Markets and God help us all if the same protocol continues to protect the system at all costs including cover-ups and not the American investor for it is bound for economic catastrophe and all will be lost.. Come on SEC the volume in CMKX was generated by two respected individuals Roger Glen AND Robert Mahue.. Yes the stock was pumped but it would have been futile if not for the involvement of both of these Men Fact is after the hiring of Roger Glen the race circuit and pump began.. Let us all not forget it was Roger Glens opinion letter that increased the Authorized from 500 billion to 800 billion yet he was never mentioned in your suit.. What about Robert Mahues statements in Prs and 8ks.. The News media should convey the real truth but seems to have been controlled. Many know the truth and many shareholders and others are well aware of the suit that is full of holes... And let me add a few more things here. Are you familiar with Donald Stocklein-Lawyer who has wrote numerous legal commentary on multiple proposed SEC Regs. ? I know you know who he is, because the SEC site has numerous evidence of all people involved with cmkm diamonds. WHY DID THE SEC CREATE ANTI-FRAUD REGULATION FOR NAKED SHORTING COMPANY STOCK, IF THERE IS NO COMPANY THAT IS NAKED SHORTED . IT MAKES NO SENSE SEC HAS NOT ANNOUNCED ONE COMPANY THAT HAS BEEN NSS'D SO WHY HAVE THIS REGULATION ? IT MUST HAVE HAPPENED, Do Your Job Will You.... Also, realize that I am an injured shareholder, along with my 40,000 + fellow cmkm diamonds shareholders. I will expect hearing from The Office of Collections and Distributions you announced in a PR, to have injured shareholders re-inbursed for being ripped off under your watch. Also, when will the DTC and DTCC be held accountable for their illicit activites approving the selling and buying of fails to deliver shares to brokerages and Real Indiviual Investors. And yes, many of us totally find it re-pulsive for any present or former SEC Commissioner to call the average American Investor stupid for trying to make a profit on the stocks we buy. Is there another reason for buying stocks, I guess only if your on the other side of investing shorting. The American People are Not as Stupid as your polls show LOL. www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-08/s70808-284.htm
|
|
|
Post by alrich on May 15, 2012 14:55:48 GMT -5
Embry - This is One of the Greatest Statements of All-Time With global stock markets tumbling, along with gold and silver, today King World News interviewed John Embry, Chief Investment Strategist of the $10 billion strong Sprott Asset Management. Embry discussed gold and other major markets, but first, here is what Embry had to say regarding recent derivatives turmoil: "This makes me very uncomfortable because I've always been very wary of the whole derivative situation. I believe the notional value of the outstanding derivatives is comfortably north of one quadrillion dollars. The Bank of International Settlements changed the definition, so they said there is only $700 trillion worth of them, rather than one quadrillion." John Embry continues: But it doesn't make any difference, these (derivatives) are many, many multiples of the world GDP. If these things get in any trouble, and I think the JP Morgan thing may be the first sign of significant trouble again, it's fantastically important to the whole financial situation. In a rational market the gold price should have been up $100, not down $40 in the wake of this. I would defer to Jim Sinclair, who I have the utmost respect for on this one. He has said for a long time that the derivative situation 'guarantees quantitative easing to infinity,' which is one of the great statements of all-time.... "I think this JP Morgan revelation just confirms that everything Jim's been saying for a long time on this subject is dead right. The fact that we will have QE to infinity would suggest that an intelligent person would be buying every single ounce of gold and silver he can get his hands on at these prices. They are trying to sell this idea that gold goes down on the 'risk off' trades that we are experiencing now. And that the 'risk off' buyers all go running into the US dollar and the US bond market. I think those are two of the riskiest things on the planet. But somehow they are still getting this 'Pavlovian response' that when things are bad out there, you should sell your gold and buy US bonds. It's ridiculous. It's important, at this time, that people who have been around, and have a pretty good grasp of what's unfolding, should express their views to the public just to counteract the propaganda they are receiving from mainstream media. It's tough enough out there without being lied to all of the time." More... www.jsmineset.com/
|
|
|
Post by alrich on May 22, 2012 21:42:18 GMT -5
K Houser. In the Matter of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. This case goes back to 2002 and involves approximately $100 million in theft of investor funds with nearly ONE TRILLION Shares of stock, a majority of which were illegally issued. Chairman Christopher Cox May 19, 2008 Securities & Exchange Commission Washington, DC RE: REG SHO, Proposed Rule 10B-21 Dear Chairman Cox: As Chairman and CEO of BioTech Medics, Inc., (Pinksheets: BMCS) I would like to endorse what was said in an earlier response by Pat Cluney from Florida and add to what has already been posted. Mr. Cluney is a shareholder in BMCS. I have witnessed from personal experience over three and a half (3-1/2) years of illegal manipulation of our stock, inclusive of counterfeiting, forging, shorting and naked shorting. I have filed over a hundred Suspicious Trading Reports (SARS) with every regulatory agency imaginable and over 36,000 pages of evidence with the SEC. There is no discipline with naked shorting and repeat offenders have no fear of the SEC because the chances of a violator being caught and disciplined is negligible. Most of the repeat offenders take the same cavalier attitude as that of a serial killer. Once you have killed, the penalty is no greater for repeat killings. So illegal manipulation of stocks continues daily by repeat offenders with impunity. Case in point: CMKM Diamonds (a/k/a Casavant Mining, now revoked former stock symbol: CMKX). The SEC has had an ongoing investigation for over 5 years titled: In the Matter of CMKM Diamonds, Inc., LA-3028. This case goes back to 2002 and involves approximately $100 million in theft of investor funds with nearly ONE TRILLION Shares of stock, a majority of which were illegally issued without pre-requisite restrictions, legal opinions; or legal opinions issued from deceased attorneys and/or were naked shorted in the market with counterfeit shares. It was not until April 7, 2008 that the SEC has finally taken action in US Dist. Court, Las Vegas, NV regarding this egregious fraud upon the investing public. Most of the stolen funds are gone, leaving investors pennies on the dollar if anything. The “mastermind” (SEC words not mine) in this fraud, John Edwards was also the “mastermind” of illegally issued shares in BioTech Medics (and dozens more pennystocks). Edwards had numerous accomplices who have yet to be cited by the SEC. The fraud in our case stems back to 2002 and involves scores of millions of dollars in fraud and over 50 million shares that we have been able to verify in an audit of our shareholders. However, FINRA over a year ago in the CMKX matter sanctioned NevWest Securities Corp (CRD # 46464) of Las Vegas and Sergey Rumyantsev and Anthony Santos $100,000 and K Houser REG SHO- 10B-21 Proposal Comments Page # 1 $75,000 each respectively, for laundering over $58 million of John Edwards and over 20 of his sham shell trusts and companies that were used to perpetrate the alleged fraud and benefit from the naked shorting. NevWest reportedly received over $2.4 million in commissions. So the alleged manipulators got away with $58 million and the sanctioned stock broker facilitators were slapped on the wrist and got away with nearly $2 million in profits. Where is the justice in this “discipline” Another case in point: In the Matter of SEC vs. Pinnacle Business Management and Jeffrey G. Turino, Case No. 8:02-cv-00822-EAK, US Dist Ct, Tampa Div. Judge Elizabeth Kovachevich found Turino guilty of violating the Securities Act and prohibited Turino from trading penny stocks for five years (which ends December 5, 2008). Within five (5) days subsequent to Judge Kovachevich’s Order, Turino allegedly had established one or more sham sell corporations to trade the CMKX stock and scores of other stocks since that time, all in violation of the Order and in full contempt of court. Where is the SEC? The SEC is impudent, under staffed and overwhelmed by the avalanche of stock fraud. You, Mr. Cox admitted in your March 4, 2008 statement that the SEC had received over 400 complaints in the past year alleging stock fraud. That is over one complaint per day. In my opinion: When will enough be enough? How much evidence do you need? A representative of OTCBB commented regarding their SHORT REPORTING. It is FLAWED. The OTCBB representative stated that a) there is no guarantee as to 100% compliance, b) offshore non NASDAQ brokerage firms are not required to report shorting, c) offshore brokerage firms permit a higher ratio of shorting stock against restricted shares and d) sophisticated shorters can circumvent reporting by getting out of their short position on the short reporting days and get back in the next day. My recommendations 1) PROHIBIT ANY AND ALL SHORTING OF PENNY STOCKS PERIOD! These fledging companies have enough mine fields to get through to become successful. By the SEC allowing legitimate and illegitimate parties to run a penny stock price up and then short it to profit from taking it down (pump and dump) is just not fair to the investing retail market. 2) REQUIRE THE POSTING OF A 25% OR HIGHER SHORT DEPOSIT BY ANY PARTY SHORTING ANY STOCKS ON ANY MAJOR EXCHANGE. The Short Deposit would be proportionate to the amount of stock shorted. For example: If John Doe wants to short XXXX –NASDAQ or AMEX shares, he must post a cash short deposit with the brokerage firm of Twenty-five Percent (25%) of the shorted value. The short deposit must be held by the brokerage firm for a term of a minimum of six (6) months subsequent to the last shorted trade. Any public company that alleges improprieties files a Suspicious Trading Activity Report and a mandatory K Houser REG SHO- 10B-21 Proposal Comments Page # 2 arbitration hearing must take place within sixty (60) days. If the shored public company prevails in arbitration, they receive the cash Short Deposit, plus any other award granted by the arbitration. If the shorter has been found to violate any rules, the shorter will be prohibited via permanent injunction for life from shorting again. 3) REQUIRE A SUBSTANTIAL AND IMMEDIATE PENALTY FOR NON-REPORTING BROKERAGE DEALERS IN THEIR FAILURE TO REPORT THE SHORTING OF STOCK (i.e. $100,000 first offense, $500,000 second). 4) REQUIRE THE REPORTING OF ANY SHORT POSITION DURING ANY THIRTY (30) DAY PERIOD WHEN THE SHORTING IS IN EXCESS OF ONE HUNDRED SHARES OR THE VALUE EXCEEDS $100. 5) BROKERAGE FIRMS AND THIRD PARTIES WHO AID AND ABET A KNOWN ADJUDGED STOCK FRAUDSTAR WILL BE FINED $1 MILLION. 6) IF THE SEC FAILS OR REFUSES TO TAKE ACTION ON A REPORTED ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SECURITIES FRAUD WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE FILING OF A COMPLAINT, AN INDIVIDUAL MAY SEEK REDRESS IN FEDERAL COURT. IF THE PARTY PREVAILS THEY WILL RECEIVE TREBLE DAMAGES, PLUS LEGAL FEES AND COSTS. Respectfully submitted, Chairman/CEO BioTech Medics, Inc. P O Box 93476 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone 972-274-5533 CC: SEC Enforcement-Washington, DC US Dept of Justice-US Attorney S Dist of NY, NYC K Houser REG SHO- 10B-21 Proposal Comments Page # 3
|
|
|
Post by alrich on May 22, 2012 21:47:41 GMT -5
can anything be done with Finanacial Firms owning cmkm diamonds shares ? 13F Filings Year 2010 ? Janney Montgomery Scott LLC Address: 1801 Market Street Philadelphia PA 19103 FORM 13F COVER PAGE Report for the Quarter Ended: 03/31/2010. CMKM DIAMONDS INC Common Stock 125809103 0 2000000 SH SOLE NONE 0 0 2000000 www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1329948/000132994810000007/jms03312010.txt Remember we saw a lot of 13F Filings on the SEC website, this one is recent, wonder if they got paid ? Penn Mutual Life Insurance CompanyAddress: Independence Square Philadelphia, PA 19172 CMKM DIAMONDS INC COM 125809103 0 2000000 SH SHARE 2000000 www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/77132/000007713210000003/june.txt07/07/2010 13F-HR for PARK NATIONAL CORP OH CMKM Diamonds Inc Equity 125809103 0 128,000 S Defined 0 128,000 www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/805676/000080567610000003/p13f06.txt www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/100517/000119312510147401/d11k.htm 11-K 1 d11k.htm FORM 11-K UAL Corporation 77 W. Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 Ual Corp/DE · 11-K · For 12/31/07 United Airlines Pilot Directed Account Plan First, go to the following website: www.secinfo.com/d14D5a.t4cRs.htmOnce you are there, hit "Ctrl" and "F" on your keyboard.. you should now see above a "Find" box in which to enter an item you wish to search on that webpage. Next, enter CMKM DIAMOND in the "Find" box. [The above is for those who did not know how to find an item on a webpage. This will take you immediately to the item on the page] Once you do that, you should see the following highlighted: #REORG/CMKM DIAMOND GEN MERGER EFFEC 04-14-06 $ 22,876.58 $ — Noticed the term, "REORG". That could be for any number of reasons. Here, the following reason is stated after CMKM DIAMOND.. GEN MERGER EFFEC 04-14-06 #REORG/CMKM DIAMOND GEN MERGER EFFEC 04-14-06 United Continental Holdings/Inc · 11-K · For 12/31/06 www.secinfo.com/d11MXs.u1Y1w.htm Page # 99 Greylin Investment Management Inc Address: 5068 W Plano Parkway Suite 277 Plano, TX 75093 13F File Number: 28-06705 June 30, 2009 Casavant Int'l Mng Corp *Restr COM 0 25600 SH SOLE 25600 CMKM Diamonds COM 125809103 0 1000000 SH www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1158583/000115858309000003/jun09.txt www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1075065/000120677412002210
|
|
|
Post by alrich on May 23, 2012 11:08:17 GMT -5
Dear CMKX Plaintiffs: www.deepcapture.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=244I know that many of you are anxious to have an opportunity to share what I have requested you to keep confidential, for the purpose of discussion with others and as a means of helping to solidify the shareholder base. I have prepared an update, which follows, that I am now prepared to have released to the various shareholder discussion forums, should one or more of you so desire. If you do decide to post this, please include the entire ‘Update.’ CMKX Litigation Update This office represents seven of CMKX’s larger shareholders who collectively hold more than 3.5 Billion shares. We have prepared a Bivens based class action lawsuit seeking release of all the funds that have been collected for the benefit of CMKX shareholders, or for damages in an amount in excess of $3,780,000,000,000. This suit alleges that the SEC commissioners have violated the Fifth Amendment Constitutional property rights of the shareholders by withholding consent to the release of such funds, for years, which amounts to a taking without due process of law. Some of the specific allegations made in the complaint include: From March 17, 2005 through April 29, 2005 CMKM traded publicly, in the US under the trading symbol “CMKX,†a total of 551,756,751,833 shares, an average share volume of more than 17 billion shares per day, reaching a maximum on April 21, 2005 of 94,654,588,201 shares. These figures do not include foreign trades nor trades made on an ex-clearing basis such as those disclosed by Jefferies & Company , Inc. on May 6, 2005: between March 25, 2004 and September 21, 2004 Jefferies traded 111,780,681,204 shares of CMKX stock on an ex-clearing basis. During the period of June 1, 2004 through October 28, 2005 a total of 2.25 Trillion “phantom†shares of CMKM Diamonds Inc, was sold into the public market through legitimate brokers, illegitimate brokers and dealers, market makers, hedge funds, ex-clearing transactions and private transactions. The sales of the majority of such shares were at all times known to the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Defendants herein. At some date prior to June 1, 2004 the Securities and Exchange Commission in concert with the Department of Justice of the United States, together combined with Robert A. Maheu and others to utilize CMKM Diamonds, Inc. for the purpose of trapping a number of widely disbursed entities and persons who were believed to be engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company. The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, with assistance from the Department of Homeland Security, believed and developed evidence that said short sellers were utilizing their activities to illegally launder moneys, wrongfully export moneys, avoid payment of taxes, and to support foreign terrorist operations. To fulfill the plan to criminally trap such wrongdoers, the Securities and Exchange Commission, with assistance from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security: (a) Assisted in and approved the retention of Roger Glenn, an ex-SEC trial attorney and drafter of Sarbanes-Oxley, to join CMKM Diamonds Inc. for the purpose of verifying claims value, increasing authorized shares of stock to 800,000,000,000, and supervising from the inside of the company; (b) Encouraged the company to expand its promotional activities, assisted in the set up of the “racing activities†of the company, and underwrote a substantial portion of the cost of such activities; (c) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the sale of certain company claims to several foreign corporations; (d) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the conferences between Robert A. Maheu and his associate/assistant Royal Canadian Mounted Police Inspector William Majcher on the one hand, and the wrongdoing short sellers on the other, all for the purpose of settling the potential liability of said wrongdoers with consent of the U. S. Government and a representation of no criminal prosecution for such illegal sales; (e) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the declaration of dividends payable by the company to each common shareholder of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (f) Consented to, facilitated, and supported the distribution of shares of CIM, a private company owned by Urban Casavant, as a stock dividend, including consent and approval of distribution of said shares to holders of more than 1.4 Trillion shares of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. common stock. (g) During the period from November, 2004 through April, 2005, CMKM Diamonds, Inc. negotiated the sale of some of its Saskatchewan, Canada mineral claims to three Chinese domiciled corporations with the advice and consent, inter alia, of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Proceeds from the consummation of such sales were placed into a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time. During the period from March, 2004 through August, 2006, on behalf of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Robert A.. Maheu, with assistance from Royal Canadian Mounted Police Inspector William Majcher, negotiated a settlement with the illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock and cellar boxing the company. In exchange for a U. S. Government promise of no prosecution for such sales, the wrongdoers each promised to pay negotiated amounts to a frozen trust for disbursal at a later time. Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that other moneys have been collected for the benefit of the shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, from the United States Government, and from the sale of additional assets including consent to enter into joint venture agreements with other companies holding mineral claims in Saskatchewan, Canada. Plaintiffs herein are further informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that said moneys, collected for the benefit of shareholders have also been placed in a trust or are otherwise now held in trust by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation and the United States Treasury. Plaintiffs herein are informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that at all times mentioned, the Securities and Exchange Commission reserved unto itself the sole and absolute discretion to determine when moneys collected pursuant to the scheme set forth above would and could be released for distribution. Demand for release of said moneys has been repeatedly presented to the Securities and Exchange Commission without result. Agents and employees of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice have represented repeatedly that the release of moneys for distribution was imminent, and/or would occur within several weeks, and/or would occur within less than a month. Each of said representations have been made knowing them to be false, and at the specific direction of the named Defendants. These actions of withholding distribution of said moneys, without compensation and without due process of law, amount to a taking of the property of the individual Plaintiffs and of all similarly situated. In an attempt to avoid protracted litigation we have seen to it that several attorneys at the SEC Office of General Counsel have a copy of the draft; we are further advised that the current SEC Commissioners are also aware [at least] of the pending filing. Our expectation was [and still partially remains] that the individually named Commissioners will not want to answer our lawsuit, thus leaving themselves open to the discovery process. The draft has been in SEC hands for approximately two weeks, and so far we have not received any response, meaningful or otherwise. They could well continue to stonewall, and force us to initiate the litigation. If nothing of significance occurs in the next two weeks the complaint will be filed on January 4, 2010. HODGES AND ASSOCIATES cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mofo&action=display&thread=4385
|
|
|
Post by alrich on May 28, 2012 22:48:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Jun 4, 2012 22:16:59 GMT -5
By: king1000 04 Jun 2012, 07:30 PM CDT Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 1098273 of 1098320 (Reply to 1098270 by newtopennies) Jump to msg. # Ntp I think clearly the only one telling the truth is Hodges. His biven facts are clearly correct given what we know. The sec is not allowed to run an operation of any kind on a publicly traded company, except after bush signed the executive order saying if it was a natter of nation security you could break that rule. They did, they have a protective order from homeland security IMO. Bill signed an nda and homeland security has forced our company to lie, and that is why Kirkpatrick can't tell us what heroes the management was. It is crazy we still get the same old, I am telling you the truth, but can't answer one question and admit you can't tell us everything. There is no cases that are sealed, no reason not to tell us why they are heroes, except for what Hodges claimed, it's a homeland security mission. Now that can drag on for years still, while we get lied to and treated like chit. 20 months SK, I don't think so. We have the chance finally to force their hand and get our records, or have them admit who is really hiding them! hey gob question, if the protective order hiding hundreds of billions of failures to deliver by brokers on wall street who committed rico fraud per wes christian, expert lawyer in this field, then isn't that definitive proof the doj and sec have covered up that fraud given they have the evidence. Would that not give us the right to gain access to that evidence to prove the crimes they are committing as there actions would amount to a criminal cover up? CMKM Short PROOF ? « Thread Started Today at 4:36pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STAND BY AS THIS UNFOLDS::::::::::::: Leslie Hakala filed a share figure at CMKM hearing using the "BLOOMBERG" system as source. All the while trading was being tracked in Canada by "STOCKWATCH" at far greater numbers (also by Medved)? HOW DOES THIS HAPPEN ?? Well Bloomberg used a 16 bit computer system, Medved & Stockwatch a 32 bit system. Remember "Jeffries" that had to reset a flag at 9.999.999 ( a 16 bit system) and days. every other day Bloomberg was + then - then + etc THEN remember the transfer out & back in 9 days to T/A PACIFIC and having the ticker correct after OLDPRO & VNGNTN will offer this to Richard Keene for public scrutiny. This is simply the physical proof. Not sure how many are intrested in the investment at this level anymore, BUT many of you own 16bit calculators and have not yet come into more advanced technology; This is important because of "Statute of limitations" to sue. Oldpro & I believe the statute began when "Spiderman" had people file in their states a couple years ago. STANDBY Read more: tfant53.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=7376#ixzz1wru9vfmLat this point we need to band together to get the truth and end this farce. The company needs to take actions against the sec, leslie hakala in particular. In canada we are going to sue lelsie hakala personally for her role in facilitating the fraud in cmkx and covering up massive rico fraud by the brokers, including canadian brokers. At this point as you are likely aware we have sued the company to get the naked short records that show the rico fraud, they will likely try and hide them hiding behind some old protective order. Obviously that is not going to stop us from getting the records as the brokers aren't even in any actions by the doj or sec and the company was going to use these records to hire a major law firm. If the records we want were unavailable then the company wouldn't even have tried to hire a lawyer, it would have been a waste of time. So obviously they were going to use the records that show rico fraud but the statute of limitations ran out convienently, but haven't run out for any shareholders as the authorities and our company have hidden the fraud records from us. It would help everyone if you can make exactly what you can prove public with any records you have. It would help to know exactly who you sent that proof to to show they have covered up fraud. If possible please make this available for all shareholders, there should be no hiding anything anymore from anyone. Time to let the chips fall where they may, it is a joke that steve can't tell us why bill and kevin and mark were heroes, they look like incompetent fools who possibly committed crimes against us. It is time for the truth, time to tell us how we got our fake shares certed. It was impossible bill frizzell saw all the fraud records and got fooled, so lets just stop pretending. cheers gus
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Jun 9, 2012 20:53:18 GMT -5
From Dave Nelson: Enough is enough, we need to group together and demand the truth. I know that sounds like a broken record but we are stuck here waiting endlessly unless there is unity in one action. IMO that should just be to demand our company act like any other company would. Any company would not stand for what is happening to us. There is a certain amount of information that is verifiable in the complaint sent to the nevada fbi, if we just focus on that and demand that the company act real, we will end this. Here is a list of shareholders and victims rights abuses by the doj and sec that our company is allowing right now. Number one is that the authorities are lying and we can prove it, that violates our rights. The number one thing our company can corroborate for us is who exactly committed the other rico fraud, ie who exactly sold the other363 billion unregistered shares in cmkx and who exactly stole the other 150+ million dollars from us. The company did the best audit ever, that is a fact, they even went over time in the cert pull, that is the exact shareholders list. The company lied when they said they needed to do an audit all these years, it was done exactly by june 2006. Every single shareholder was identified and every broker who sold the other 363 billion unregistered shares identified, exactly. So all we need is our company to identify those brokers for all of us. It took us seven suing the company for them to even act, now they want to hide the records from us obviously. Well we don't need any personal information, and the company obviously isn't going after the brokers, so all we need is exact numbers of shares sold by each broker in the 363 billion unregistered shares that were not sold by insiders in cmkx. Then we can demand that the doj and sec include those brokers in their actions or demand an explanation why they didn't include them in their actions. The money they stole would have funded our company right now and we would have already moved on. You see it is about the past, as the sec's and doj's violations of our rights is preventing our company from moving forward right now, they are harming us as I type. A real company would demand answers. The company should put the exact totals of the brokers naked short or failure to deliver as counted in the cert pull, ie td waterhouse, etrade, ameritrade, nite, etc. The exact number they counted in the cert pull, no reason to hide that, it makes no sense. It is time to end this facade, we know the company is lying at the end as we know all management had the fraud records in 2005. It is not right to be caught in a lie then just get to keep lying, it is over. We deserve real answers now, or our money. In this complaint there are many points easy to prove, enough that our company needs to act, not continue the facade, if they were real: 1. The Authorities investigation (into CMKX) was well under way by May 2004, before hundreds of billions of shares were sold to investors in a publicly traded company and the money laundered. Corporate insiders were aided and abetted in their crimes by high-powered attorneys, accountants, transfer agents, major banking institutions, brokerage houses, and clearing firms. It occurred right under the noses of the SEC and NASD (now FINRA); both agencies ignoring dozens of blatant warning signs, allowing the scam to go on for years. The Coalition asks for an investigation into why the Authorities just allowed these crimes to happen and the money laundered over years when it was their duty to stop these crimes when they detected them in 2004, costing the company and its shareholders hundreds of millions of dollars. 2. The Coalition alleges and has provided evidence that Leslie Hakala conspired with ex-SEC attorney D. Roger Glenn (who wrote opinion letters allowing over 300 billion shares of stock to be dumped into the market) to facilitate the sale of hundreds of billions of shares of CMKX stock, all proceeds from those sales were apparently stolen right under the nose of The Authorities while they watched. D. Roger Glenn escape and indictment by the DOJ for his role in this fraud. PR person for CMKX, Andrew Hill, has publicly stated Leslie Hakala was fully aware of what was happening inside CMKX and had been in contact with D. Roger Glenn in 2004. Furthermore, the FBI never questioned Andrew Hill, even though he had pertinent, incriminating first-hand information in this case. The Coalition asks for Andrew Hill to be deposed and Leslie Hakala and other SEC enforcement attorneys investigated for their role in this fraud and its cover up. 3. When Leslie Hakala met with CMKX management and shareholders lawyer Bill Frizzell on May 11th 2005, she was fully aware of the fraud inside CMKX at this time. Bill Frizzell presented her with indisputable evidence of massive counterfeiting of CMKX stock, a fact that later proved to be true as 622 billion unregistered shares were sold in CMKX stock out of 703 issued and outstanding shares in total. Mr. Frizzell had direct evidence of hundreds of billions of unregistered share sales by brokers such as Etrade, Ameritrade, TD Waterhouse, and others. None of those brokers were ever indicted and no civil action has ever taken place despite the indisputable evidence of their crimes. Not only did Leslie Hakala not stop these crimes from happening, and saving shareholders hundreds of millions of dollars, but she allowed the fraud to continue. These corrupt brokers were allowed to sell hundreds of billions of additional counterfeit shares, steal the illegal proceeds, and then have their crimes completely covered up. Hakala allowed corrupt management to launder their proceeds from their crimes for years. The Coalition asks for an immediate investigation into the evidence presented at that meeting and to the SEC actions and inactions after that meeting. 4. Co-conspirators John Edward Dohnau, Michael Williams, and Rendal Williams, plus a cast of numerous other associates have not been charged for their part in this massive fraud. Why? 5. The phone records from NevWest, which show that they contacted the SEC each time Edwards came in with CMKX certs to sell, many of which were clearly forged and fraudulent, some even “signed†by an individual who had been deceased for months. Instead of taking action to halt the obvious fraud against innocent shareholders, the SEC and NASD (FINRA) ignored the evidence and dozens of other red flags, allowing the scheme to continue unabated, costing unsuspecting buyers of CMKX stock hundreds of millions of dollars. The Coalition wants access to those phone records and an investigation into why the SEC allowed those certs to be sold after they had already subpoenaed the fraud records used in the indictments and SEC civil action. 6. Clearing firm Computer Clearing Services (now owned by Penson Worldwide, Inc.) helped John Edwards trade over 250 billion shares of CMKX stock totaling over $53 million. Clearing firms and brokers weren’t the only ones who ignored red flags that should have triggered the filing of Suspicious Activity Reports. Several Nevada banks, most prominently Silver State Bank and Wells Fargo Bank, allowed CMKM Diamonds and related fraudulent companies to run hundreds of millions of dollars through dozens of accounts. Penson is mentioned in the article, which documents the counterfeiting of the stock market by Wall Street, organized crime and terrorists; a crime which all Authorities were fully aware of before the year 2000 and did nothing to stop although trillions of counterfeit shares were sold into the market and trillions of dollars stolen from the general public: www.marketrap.com/article/view_ar….shor t-selling. The Coalition asks for an investigation into Penson Worldwide’s history of covering up the crimes of Wall Street, organized crime, and terrorist naked short sales, and those of John Edwards in particular. 7. The Authorities subpoenaed the Silver State Bank regarding suspicious activities on September 5th 2004 (the Silver State Bank had no action taken against it for its role in this fraud) BEFORE hundreds of billions of shares were sold in CMKX stock. The evidence gathered from that subpoena showed 64 million dollars went through the Silver State Bank. Among the transactions executed by Silver State Bank after those subpoenas include: • Wire transfers totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars were executed with only the notation “transferring to Personal Acct. per cust. Transfer via phoneâ€. • Checks from various accounts set up as shell companies and controlled by Casavant and Edwards written out only to “CASHâ€â€¦including one for $350,000. • Multi-million dollar wire transfers between Edwards and Casavant run through dozens of accounts they controlled there. • Millions of dollars written out of company accounts to Casavant, his wife Carolyn, and several family members; often on temporary checks. The Coalition asks for an investigation into why the Silver State Bank continued to allow money laundering into the millions of dollars when the Authorities had already subpoenaed the fraud records used in the indictments and civil actions. We also ask for an investigation into why the DOJ and SEC allowed these crimes to continue unabated when they already had the evidence of the crimes. 8. The Authorities allowed Robert Maheu, Urban Casavant, and other management to continue to promote the sale of CMKX stock through various means, including a drag racing team, after they were fully aware of the fraud inside CMKM Diamonds Inc. Robert Maheu, Roger Glenn and Don Stoecklein were not indicted for his role in this fraud although six hundred billion shares were sold while they ran CMKX. The Coalition wants an investigation into why these individuals were not indicted; why the DOJ and SEC continued to allow them to promote this fraud after they had subpoenaed the fraud records; and why they allowed these masterminds the time to launder their proceeds from their crimes. 9. In letters to other brokers in mid-2005, shareholders lawyer Bill Frizzell not only identified the brokers who sold over 300 billion shares of CMKX stock, but those brokers continued to sell unregistered shares for months while The Authorities watched. The money from the sale of hundreds of billions of shares (approximately 190 million dollars) was stolen by these brokers, with none of those known brokers being indicted, and none of that money recovered. Why were these brokers not indicted, and why were their crimes covered up? Why did the Authorities continue to allow them to sell unregistered securities in CMKX stock when the fraud was clearly detected? 10. In Bill Frizzell’s letter to TD Waterhouse in Canada, he explains that none of the shares sold by them were even on the NOBO list, meaning they were sold unregistered. TD Waterhouse continued to sell unregistered shares of CMKX stock for months, as did all other Canadian brokers. In his letters, Mr. Frizzell also stated that the SEC was watching this very closely. Mr. Frizzell stated in his deposition to the SEC that none of the Canadian brokers had shares on the NOBO list, indicating all shares sold in Canada were sold unregistered. There has been no action against any Canadian brokers from The Authorities and since all illegal shares sold by Canadian brokers were grandfathered, they would not have to cover their fraud. The Coalition asks that there be a public inquiry (by an outside agency) into the grandfathering of trillions of counterfeit shares by Wall Street, organized crime, and by terrorists. The crimes could have been stopped well over a decade ago, but were allowed to happen, and then the fraud covered up. Why? 11. According to Bill Frizzell, Andrew Petillion (Branch Chief of Enforcement at the Pacific Regional Office for the SEC) issued this warning with regards to his evidence of the naked short in CMKX stock: “By the way, if this is an orchestrated short squeeze against the brokerage houses to make the stock price go up, we will come after those who are responsible. We would not look kindly on a cert pull because it would cause market manipulation.†The Authorities allowed CMKX stock to be manipulated down, but would not allow the natural correction for this: a short squeeze. This mirrors what the SEC said to David Patch regarding the Grandfather Clause: it was supposed to stop runs in stocks which had been manipulated by Wall Street firms, which in-turn counterfeited trillions of shares of stock in hundreds if not thousands of publicly traded companies. An example of this is Eagle Tech Communications. Authorities knew Eagle Tech was the victim of counterfeiting by Wall Street firms and crime families, but grandfathered those counterfeit shares so they would never have to be covered, while protecting the criminal firms at the same time. The Coalition wants to know why the DOJ and SEC allowed Wall Street firms to create the Grandfather Clause (with the help of the SEC) as this allowed felonies to be covered up; felonies committed by terrorists and organized crime families. 12. The Authorities and alleged corrupt Judge, Brenda Murray (see the modus operandi of Brenda Murray in evidence presented regarding the Gary Aguirre cover up), would not allow evidence of massive naked shorting in CMKX stock in the administrative hearing (October 5, 2005) that eventually ended up in the revocation of CMKX stock. Financial expert Jim DeCosta analyzed the naked short in CMKX stock and found it to be 14-1. No evidence of any other broker’s fraud or the fraud already detected by The Authorities was entered into the hearing, and billions of shares of CMKX stock traded afterwards; all monies stolen from shareholders. The Coalition asks for an investigation into the cover up of the largest naked short in history by Judge Brenda Murray and the SEC enforcement attorneys. The Coalition asks for an investigation into why the Authorities allowed this crime to continue when clearly they were aware of it, and why did they allow all of the money to be stolen from the victims in this case when they could have stopped it in 2004? 13. In Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-0437, 4-7-08, United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Leslie Hakala alleges that “To divert attention from their own dumping of CMK shares, Casavant persuaded CMKM’s investors that the reported high trading volume in CMKM stock reflected extensive “naked short selling†rather than ordinary stock dilution.†Leslie Hakala was fully aware that there was massive naked shorting in CMKX stock by Wall Street firms (evidence entered to the FBI in this case), and that she concealed the fact that there were other perpetrators besides the insiders of CMKM Diamonds Inc. This is a mirror image of the victims of Operation Uptick. From March 2003 through May 2005 John Edwards sold almost 260 billion shares of the purportedly 622 billion registered/unrestricted CMKM shares. That leaves approximately 362 billion purportedly registered/unrestricted CMKM shares that Leslie Hakala fails to account for in said civil action. The Authorities try and make it look like all shares and money stolen was by the corrupt insiders. The Coalition asks for an investigation into Leslie Hakala’s actions which appear to be nothing short of criminal and follow the modus operandi of covering up the crimes of Wall Street firms. 14. In its Grand Jury Superseding Indictment 2-09-CR-00132-RLH-RJJ, 5-27-09, United States District Court, District of Nevada, the Grand Jury charges that: “…To create the appearance of an active and established market for CMKM stock, and to disguise the fact that the conspirators were virtually the only sellers of CMKM stock…†DONALD STOECKLEIN DEPOSITION, 1-24-06 In said deposition, Donald Stoecklein testifies that naked short expert Jim Decosta, with 25 years of experience, told both Bill Frizzell and him that a 14 to 1 short position exists in CMKM stock. That means that for every one legitimate share that exists, 14 naked short shares exist, which in turn means that numerous naked short sellers exist. In said deposition, Donald Stoecklein testifies that they obtained a NOBO list and the number of CMKM shares on that NOBO list exceeded the number of CMKM shares on the list of 1st Global Stock Transfer, which in turn means that naked short sellers exist. The Coalition demands that Jim DeCosta’s report be made public along with the cert pull deposition which shows the Authorities made false statements in this case to cover up the crimes of many Wall Street brokers by making it look like corrupt insiders were the only sellers of unregistered shares of CMKX stock. 15. On 6-24-09, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant John Edwards (#991), Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant Daryl Anderson (#102), and Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants Kathleen and Anthony Tomasso pursuant to Civil Action No. 08- CV 0437, 4-7-08, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. In said Motion for Summary Judgment, the Securities and Exchange Commission alleges, “CMKM provided investors with phony maps and fabricated videos of alleged mineral claims in North and South America.†The following was left out of the Administrative hearing. The following are excerpts from Regional Triaxial Aeromagnetic Survey Assessment Work Report by N. Ralph Newson, William Jarvis on the Fort a la Corne Diamond Project: “Drilling results and additional ground magnetic and gravity surveys have shown the best known kimberlite bodies to be bedded, and to have a very different shape from most known kimberlite bodies. In most of the well-known diamond mines in Africa, for example, and in those in the NWT in Canada, the upper portions of the kimberlite bodies have been eroded, leaving only the feeder pipe, which has a “carrot†shape, getting smaller in diameter with depth. However, in the Fort à la Corne swarm, the tops of the kimberlitic volcanic edifices are COMPLETELY PRESERVED [emphasis added by author], and they are shaped more or less like a soup bowl, with two larger horizontal dimensions, and one smaller vertical dimension. Several of these have an inferred geological resource (based on a few holes and on geophysical modeling) in excess of 100 million tonnes, one has nearly a billion tons, and one group of five which are close together, or perhaps coalescing, contain about 2 billion tons of kimberlite. There are thus HUGE VOLUMES OF KIMBERLINE WITHIN A FEW HUNDRED METRES OF THE SURFACE.†[Emphasis added by author]. The Coalition asks for an independent investigation into all claims held by CMKX past and present, including the warehouse full of core samples currently held in a warehouse in Saskatchewan, not mentioned in the hearing, under the control of Emerson Koch, Urban Casavant’s partner. We ask for an investigation into all land lost during the era where the DOJ and SEC allowed the masterminds in CMKX management to commit fraud against the shareholders or when the DOJ sting operation was on. 16. If this was purely a fraud, then the DOJ/FBI should have already extradited Urban Casavant since the evidence they used against him was from late 2004. It is unacceptable that the Authorities allowed Urban to sell hundreds of billions of shares after they knew he was committing fraud, it is unacceptable the Authorities gave him time to launder that money, and it is unacceptable they have not arrested the largest penny stock swindler ever. He is free to do what he wants and spend the money he stole from shareholders while we lost everything and our company was destroyed. The Coalition demands to know why Urban Casavant has not been arrested for his crimes. 17. The SEC revoked CMKM Diamonds Inc on October 28th 2005, knowing that would prevent the perpetrators from ever having to cover their naked short positions in CMKX stock and in turn ensuring that the shareholders would never recover the damages they suffered. Thousands of victims in other companies of the exact same crime also received no compensation from this massive naked shorting fraud. This tactic was used in concert with the perpetrators who counterfeited the stock market into the trillions to cover-up the fraud and allow the criminals to escape from having to cover their counterfeit shares. The perpetrators in concert with the SEC and DTCC grandfathered trillions of dollars in felony counterfeit stock sales to hide the largest crime in history. The Coalition asks for a full investigation into the Grandfather Clause and the hundreds to thousands of companies who were victims of the illegal clause and in particular all firms who had their shares Grandfathered that sold illegal CMKX stock.
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Jun 11, 2012 10:51:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Jun 14, 2012 22:28:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Jun 20, 2012 10:03:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Jun 20, 2012 10:25:59 GMT -5
G-20 Endorses Federated Approach to ID Code Creation June 20, 2012 Tom Steinert-Threlkeld The leaders of the G-20 industrial nations have endorsed the recommendations the Financial Stability Board, regarding legal entity identifiers. The endorsement is likely to lead to a three-tier structure for governing the registration, issuance, validation and storage of codes that identify participants in financial transactions around the world. The board, which is attempting to coordinate the creation of a worldwide system for creating unique 20-character codes for market participants, in the past month recommended the creation of a regulatory oversight committee, for ultimate decision-making; a central operating unit, for the maintenance of standards governing the issuance of the codes; and local operating units, for registering, issuing and keeping the codes. The codes would be collected “into a logically centralized database,’’ not necessarily physically centralized. The logical centralization through computerized mechanisms would keep track “of unique LEIs based on consistent standards, protocols and procedures” that would appear “seamless to users.’’ In a communiqué issued Tuesday, the G-20 leaders said: We endorse the FSB recommendations regarding the framework for development of a global legal entity identifier (LEI) system for parties to financial transactions, with a global governance framework representing the public interest. The LEI system will be launched by March 2013 and we ask the FSB to report on implementation progress by the November 2012 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors’ meeting. We encourage global adoption of the LEI to support authorities and market participants in identifying and managing financial risks. The federated approach was proposed in a paper submitted to the Financial Stability Board by a group of industry participants led by Financial InterGroup of New York. Its approach follows the 20-digit identification code standard set out by the International Organization for Standardization and does not require a centralized database. It relies on a coordination of data on servers spread around the world, similar to the Domain Name Servers used in operating the Internet. ”
"Our group's proposal is a safe, effective and neutral approach,'' said Allan D. Grody, president of Financial Intergroup. The Global Financial Markets Association said the FSB’s recommendations recognize “
the need for a strong central control process to ensure integrity of information in the LEI database.” The trade group, which includes the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, said it was encouraging the board “to utilize the industry-endorsed prototype LEI utility’’ for registering and issuing the codes. That utility was developed by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation and the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication. The Web portal that would take in registrations for codes was demonstrated by the DTCC, itself an industry utility, at the May operations conference held in Phoenix by SIFMA. DTCC, at the time, said it was prepared to open the LEI utility for business on June 1. But it delayed the launch, to coincide with international efforts to create a unified registration system. The FSB plan calls for the system to start operating by the end of this year and operate on a self-standing basis by March 2013. The rollout would be managed by an Implementation Group. The Implementation Group be composed of “interested and willing experts (legal, IT and other) from the global regulatory groups from different geographical regions. The group would oversee legal and policy work, as well as the technology work that would establish the central operating unit. “If the Implementation Group is to comprise only regulators, then GFMA would like to see active interaction with industry experts to ensure the system is set up in a timely and effective way,’’ the international trade group said. www.securitiestechnologymonitor.com/news/g20-endorses-fsb-lei-recommendations-30804-1.html?pg=1&ET=securitiesindustry:e3779:185488a:&st=email&utm_source=editorial&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=STM_BNA_08302010_062012
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Jun 20, 2012 13:56:10 GMT -5
The SEC tried to “Chill” CMKM Diamonds in order to remove the SEC’s liability. BHollenegg post on CMKM Diamonds « Thread Started on Dec 19, 2008, 1:44am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BHollenegg DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: SEC Commission v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. et al « Reply #27 Today at 4:28am » The interesting pieces of information that stands out after reading the "SEC Commission vs CMKM Diamonds, Inc. et al" are… 1. No fines assessed on Urban Casavant 2. No mention of CMKX Naked Short Count. Why is this?… Urban Casavant was the CEO during the illegal activities of John Edwards, yet Urban doesn’t receive a fine. Urban Casavant, according to the SEC put out false Press Releases, yet Urban Casavant doesn’t receive a fine? The largest naked shorted stock in the history of the stock market and there is no mention of this or references. Is this because?… 1. The SEC threatened to charge Urban Casavant in 2003 for stock price manipulation if he followed through the cert pull as stated publicly in his 2003 Seven Step Plan to stop the naked shorting of CMKX. (see reference below) 2. The SEC investigated Urban Casavant’s procedures he used to stop and identify the naked shorts. The SEC investigated whether Urban’s plans to prove and identify the guilty parties in the naked shorting of CMKX caused the NSS to increase to the magnitude of the largest naked shorted stock in the history of the stock market. The SEC tried to “Chill” CMKM Diamonds in order to remove the SEC’s liability. 3. When Urban Casavant suspected illegal dumping of CMKX Stock, Urban hid in a parked vehicle and monitored the transfer agent’s office to see if any one related to CMKM Diamonds was conducting business with the transfer agent without his knowledge and approval. 4. When Urban Casavant found out John Edwards was dumping shares, Urban was so angry, they had to practically peel Urban off of John Edwards. 5. Urban Casavant is still involved with CMKM Diamonds, Inc. These are important points to remember as we go after our compensation. It will be interesting to see how this all unfolds. Thank you, Bhollenegg Reference…Urban’s Seven Point Plan… Urban Casavant’s 2003 Plan of Action to Stop Naked Shorting The Evasive Action…First Public Warning…The Short List: Urban Casavant announced that the majority shareholders plan on holding their shares in certificate form indefinitely if it helps the Company combat "naked short selling". Also, Urban locked-up all his CMKI Stock. LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 7, 2003 Casavant Mining Kimberlite International Inc. (OTCBB:CMKI) announced today a series of corporate initiatives in advance of the January 15, 2003 majority shareholder meeting to be held in Las Vegas, NV. First, CMKI is encouraging every shareholder to hold his shares in certificate form and if the shares are held in street name to make sure that he registers the shares in his own name to make sure the shareholder is properly identified in the official shareholder's audit that is being conducted by the Company and its Transfer Agent. The purpose of the audit is to make sure that every shareholder of record is identified for purposes of the CMKI's mandatory share and cash dividend policy. The share and cash dividend policy is explained below in fuller detail. Second, CMKI will be contacting the broker-dealer and market maker community to request their cooperation in the shareholder audit. In this regard, CMKI has identified the following market-makers who are active in the Company's shares based on information obtained on January 6, 2003 at www.otc.bb.com, as follows: AGIS Aegis Capital Corp. BAMM Brokerage America, Inc. BMAS BMA Securities BPAT Baird, Patrick & Co., Inc. CLYN Carlin Equities Corp. DOMS Domestic Securities, Inc. FRAN Wm. V. Frankel & Co., Inc. GNET Globenet Securities, Inc. (1) GNLN Gunallen Financial, Inc. GVRC GVR Company LLC HILL Hill Thompson Magid, L.P. JEFF Jeffries & Company, Inc. LTCO Ladenburg, Thalman & Co., Inc. MAYF May Financial Corporation MHMY M. H. Meyerson & Co., Inc. NAIB Global Partners Securities Inc. NATL National Securities Corporation NITE Knight Securities, L.P. PGON Paragon Capital Markets, Inc. PILL Phillip Louis Trading Corp. PRGM Program Trading Corp. PUGS Puglisi & Co. QUIN Park Financial Group, Inc. SCHB Schwab Capital Markets, L.P. SEAB Seabord Securities, Inc. TDCM T.D. Waterhouse Capital Markets VFIN Vfinance Investments, Inc. (1) Globenet Securities, Inc. was an active market maker during part of the trading day on January 6, 2003, but later "excused" itself from market making activities. Third, CMKI has been informed that majority shareholders plan on holding their shares in certificate form indefinitely if it helps the Company combat "naked short selling". Under a naked short sale, short positions are not declared, shares are not borrowed to cover the short sale, and the shares are sold without delivering the stock to the purchaser. Real shareholder ownership is undermined by naked short sales of stock and failed deliveries of real certificates that artificially inflate ownership and devalue the price of the securities. Fourth, CMKI, as previously announced, plans on approving at its majority shareholder meeting a mandatory share and cash dividend policy. The share dividend policy reflects the Company's acquisition strategy that identifies undervalued take-over targets in mineral resource and related businesses. The Company is currently evaluating 7 companies each of whom will benefit from new managerial economic assessment, asset appraisals, accounting peer review and legal restructuring. Fifth, CMKI believes that its shareholders and the targeted company's shareholders will best benefit from a "cross-dividend" policy. For example, if CMKI acquires a new target company in an exchange of shares, CMKI will pay its shareholders a mandatory 8% dividend of the total number of shares exchanged with the new target company. The shareholders of the new target company will be treated with the same fairness and therefore will be entitled to receive a mandatory 8% dividend of the total number of CMKI shares exchanged with the new target company. Since the mining and mineral resources business is highly fragmented, CMKI believes that its acquisition strategy will provide a way to leverage its assets into a larger more diversified portfolio of companies. Sixth, CMKI believes that its cross-dividend policy will result in share dividends being issued in the 3Q03. The legal audit of its shareholders of record will speed up this process. Further, CMKI has structured its mandatory 10% cash dividend policy (which is based on its net earnings) to benefit those shareholders of record on the declared dividend date. Seventh, CMKI believes that its acquisition strategy, spearheaded by the Casavant Family, will require the addition of a seasoned management team. Accordingly, the Board of Directors has nominated Jay McFadden to become Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, David Bending as President and Chief Operation Officer, and Rick Taulli as Secretary. Messrs. McFadden, Bending and Taulli are currently affiliated with Juina Mining Corporation. See www.juinamining.com. The Board of Directors has nominated David DeSorneau as Treasurer. Mr. DeSorneau was previously a consultant to CMKI. See December 3, 2002 Press Release. The nominations will be voted upon by the majority shareholders at the January 15, 2003 meeting. findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2003_Jan_7/ai_96198036 Read more: camrhon.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=safe&action=display&thread=5035#ixzz1yMSUz5zr
|
|
|
Post by alrich on Jun 22, 2012 15:53:14 GMT -5
www.buyins.net/articles/gamesshortsellersplay.pdf For those that believe CMKX is part of a sting opperation, here is a glimpse into what others (O'Quinn)are reportedly charging regarding the DTCC and naked shorting. If O'Quinn is right, and if cmkx is indeed part of a larger sting,...no wonder its taking so long. ------------ (page header) Lawsuits, DTCC, Short Trading Liability Damages More lawsuits, DTCC naked short trading lawsuits largest in U.S. history The suits target illegal, naked short trading. In answering lawsuits, DTCC defends its short trading practices and denies liability for damages sought which may exceed $4 trillion dollars damage to small companies and investors nationwide. Plaintiffs attorneys allege they have discovered in excess of 1,200 hedge fund and offshore accounts funneled through over 150 broker-dealers and market makers in a joint conspiracy to fleece small and medium listed companies. The plaintiffs' trial team is lead by John O'Quinn of Houston, Texas, the nation's preeminent expert in personal injury law, who previously set the national benchmark for plaintiff recoveries in breast implant cases, tobacco industry cases, and environmental hazards. O'Quinn now purses DTCC. Personal Injury Law - Lawsuits DTCC: www.personal-injury-lawyer-info.com/law/dtcc-lawsuits.htm---------- FWIW I believe it was alleged by Frizzel on an mp3 made over a year ago, that O'Quinn had proof of connections of major crime families and terrorist groups to naked shorting. cmkxgroup.proboards88.com/index.c....read=1162764015 Read more: cmkxunitedforum.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6738#ixzz1yYd2tlrFLawsuits DTCC www.personal-injury-lawyer-info.com/law/dtcc-lawsuits.htmThe suits target illegal, naked short trading. In answering lawsuits, DTCC defends its short trading practices and denies liability for damages sought which may exceed $4 trillion dollars damage to small companies and investors nationwide. Plaintiffs attorneys allege they have discovered in excess of 1,200 hedge fund and offshore accounts funneled through over 150 broker-dealers and market makers in a joint conspiracy to fleece small and medium listed companies. The plaintiffs' trial team is lead by John O'Quinn of Houston, Texas, the nation's preeminent expert in personal injury law, who previously set the national benchmark for plaintiff recoveries in breast implant cases, tobacco industry cases, and environmental hazards. O'Quinn now purses DTCC. Personal Injury Law - Lawsuits DTCC: An investor considering any DTCC lawsuit should be aware that state personal injury laws and principles may apply, determine which causes of action create liability, what damages are recoverable, and how to recover the award of a judgment. Also federal securities law may preempts state fraud causes of action and requires claims to be filed in the federal court or administrative processes, or alternatively, may permit an election of either state or federal law. In all cases, settlement of DTCC lawsuits before trial is encouraged by the court system as a matter of judicial economy. Settlement of DTCC lawsuits is voluntary, and offers several distinct advantages over trial. These advantages include the elimination of risk, a guaranteed recovery of a known amount, and the reduction of time, attorney fees, and costs required to collect amounts owed. The primary disadvantage of settling a DTCC lawsuits is economic - plaintiffs may recover far more if the court or a jury assesses damage amounts. Interpretation of Laws: The application of personal injury laws common law fraud is an organic process, based upon facts which are unique to each claim. Statutes, case law, and rules of court all influence the success or failure of each case. Lawyers who specialize in DTCC lawsuits for plaintiffs tend to be creative in expansive interpretation of both liability and damages sustained. Likewise, defense attorneys and claims adjusters are equally creative in influencing settlement for less than the true trial value when the claimant is not represented. See also: Lawsuits DTCC - How to Find a Lawyer, Laws, & Lawyer Searches. See: Personal Injury Law Firms and Attorney Management for more detailed information: www.personal-injury-lawyer-info.com/law/dtcc-lawsuits.htm
|
|