Post by CAMRHON on Apr 26, 2011 5:38:43 GMT -5
Dear Mr. Fryar
We are the CMKX Shareholders Coalition for Justice; I represent only those that want the truth, whatever that may be. I respect that you are willing to take on this case as I have talked to many who were not. I am in the process of writing a complaint to be filed regarding the violation of all CMKX bona fide shareholders victims’ rights. I have corresponded with the DOJ Victims Rights Ombudsman; their office said I should file a complaint against the DOJ involved in our particular case, so Nevada.
In this report by Mark Faulk, former CEO of CMKM Diamonds, he verifies what was already in public, that the DOJ/SEC had in fact subpoenaed the Silver State Bank. The date he mentions in this article is Sept 5th 2004; he then chronicles the fraud the DOJ/SEC allowed to happen along with the Silver State Bank:
“That on or about the 5th day of September 2004 the bank was served with a subpoena with regard to accounts maintained at the branch plaintiff supervised. Certain executives of defendants (Silver State Bancorp, Silver State Bank) owned stock in companies controlled by the subject of the subpoena and became disconcerted when the bank was served with the aforementioned subpoena.”
thenakedtruthbook.com/?p=24
The rest of the article from Mark Faulk explains the details of what happened after the DOJ/SEC were fully aware of the fraud happening and simply watched as the fraud continued and in fact allowed fraud to continue in several other companies related to CMKX. It was clearly their duty to stop the fraud on Sept 5th 2004 and protect the investors of CMKX:
“But a little diamond mining company from Canada that turned out to be the biggest penny stock fraud in history might become a major problem for McCain’s campaign as well. Insiders with CMKX defrauded over 50,000 shareholders of in excess of $250 million. A large portion of that money was run through a single Silver State Bank branch in Las Vegas. In all, former CMKX CEO Urban Casavant and reputed mastermind John Edwards (no, not that John Edwards) opened over 100 bank accounts at Silver State, and ran tens of millions of dollars through the bank.
In one multi-million dollar gamble taken by Silver State Bank, they accepted not just one but four checks for $2.5 million dollars each from a fraudulent company account at Wells Fargo Bank in Las Vegas in one week…written on temporary checks. John Edwards opened an account for a company called Saint George Metals on the same day that CMKM Diamonds announced a “business partnership” with the company, which in reality was just a bank account whose only signor was John Edwards. Edwards would write a $2.5 million check to CMKM Diamonds on a temporary check from Wells Fargo, and Urban Casavant would deposit it the “official” company account at Silver State Bank and write a press release announcing the investment. In turn, money was filtered back to Edwards either in illegally issued company stock or cash, essentially making the exchange a wash. To Silver State Bank’s credit, they at least wrote “HOLD” across one of the deposits, apparently waiting for the $2.5 million temporary check to clear before crediting the CMKM Diamonds’ account.
This was not an isolated case, but was instead the normal way of doing business with Casavant, Edwards, and their cohorts. It was an incredible whirlwind of activity for Silver State Bank and other Las Vegas banks, including Wells Fargo, Nevada State, and Sun West Bank. Hundreds of checks, wire transfers, and deposits totaling tens of millions and possibly hundreds of millions of dollars flowed like champagne in the Vegas casinos.
Among the transactions executed by Silver State Bank:
• Wire transfers totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars were executed with only the notation “transferring to Personal Acct. per cust. transfer via phone”.
• Checks from the CMKXtreme and other accounts controlled by Casavant and Edwaerds written out only to “CASH”…including one for $350,000.
• Multi-million dollar wire transfers between Edwards and Urban, run through one of the almost 100 accounts they controlled there.
• Millions of dollars written out of company accounts to Urban, his wife Carolyn, and several family members, often on temporary checks.
The scam finally came crashing down in late 2005 when the SEC finally delisted CMKX, and a shareholder named Kevin West was appointed by Urban to take over while Casavant fled to Canada. West inherited a company with no tangible assets, no real business…and $558 in the bank. Edwards, Casavant, and their cohorts had stolen the rest. West brought in Bill Frizzell, an attorney from Tyler, Texas, who had been conducting a multi-year investigation into CMKX for a shareholders’ group.
They have since filed numerous lawsuits against Edwards, Casavant, and others, and have subpoenaed records from Silver State Bank and other banks associated with the scam in an ongoing effort to recover assets for the defrauded shareholders. The SEC recently filed charges against eleven individuals and three companies in the CMKX case, but a multi-year investigation by a task force comprised of the DOJ, FBI, and IRS has yet to produce any arrests or charges.
Silver State Bank has not been charged in the CMKM Diamonds case, although they did fire an employee named Patricia DeCosta, who approved most of the transactions. DeCosta in turn filed a lawsuit in early 2006 against her former employer, detailing her side of the story:
That on or about the 5th day of September 2004 the bank was served with a subpoena with regard to accounts maintained at the branch plaintiff supervised. Certain executives of defendants (Silver State Bancorp, Silver State Bank) owned stock in companies controlled by the subject of the subpoena and became disconcerted when the bank was served with the aforementioned subpoena.
The fact remains that Silver State Bank never filed a single Suspicious Activities Report (SARS) while 50,000 CMKX shareholders lost their entire investments.
The evidence above is at the heart of my complaint I am filing on behalf of all CMKX bona fide share holder. The DOJ/SEC either allowed CMKX to get destroyed for their investigation, or it was a sting, either way our victim’s rights have been violated.
I represent those that simply want the truth, good or bad. I would appreciate if you could answer the questions I have included and hopefully back the report I am sending in to the DOJ Ombudsman for Victims Rights. In areas I am wrong I would appreciate the truth and will edited areas where I have made mistakes or not file the report at all.
There are very pertinent legal questions that can clear the picture for all CMKX shareholders who are victims in this case. The answer, in my opinion, actually points to the fact that the DOJ Victims Rights Ombudsman should be doing what Al Hodges is doing. The restitution for all victims in this case was already collected, that is clear as none of the brokers who were caught have been included in an actions currently ongoing whatsoever. They obviously made the deals talked about by Al Hodges, and our own company obviously knows about these deals and has to pretend they don’t due to non disclosure, or it would appear that way in my opinion by the evidence I am presenting to you. It is clear to me that the operation Mr. Hodges explains did in fact occur, and given the evidence will corroborate that if subpoenaed, there are many ramifications to that fact becoming public.
The coalition will be a client that contributes more than the minimum if you can accommodate our request.
Thanks in advance, David Nelson.
Here is a list of legal questions I have researched the answer to but need a clear statement from a professional to give credibility to the report going into the DOJ Victims Rights Ombudsman. Each question will relate to the attached report:
1. Mark Faulk stated that the Silver Stank Bank, which was the majority of the evidence used in the company’s, DOJ, and SEC’s actions, was subpoenaed on Sept 5th 2004. At that time it was clear that insiders of CMKX were selling unregistered shares and laundering the money through that bank. In discussions with SEC officials I was told that at the moment they determine with evidence that fraud is being committed it is the SEC legal duty to halt the stock from trading and stop the fraud and protect the investors from further harm. Was the DOJ/SEC permitted to allow the fraud to continue to for the sake of their investigation if it harmed the shareholders, or was the DOJ/SEC allowed to use CMKX and its shareholders as a vehicle in a sting operation and hide that fact from them?
2. The DOJ/SEC after subpoenaing the fraud activity did not halt CMKX from trading; in fact in evidence produced they allowed all John Edwards fraudulent trades after this subpoena and per phone records were contacted on each transaction. They allowed Urban Casavant to write checks worth millions after this subpoena, the Silver State bank, although knowing they were subpoenaed allowed the fraud to continue, and lawyer for CMKX Roger Glenn continued to follow through with deals with other publicly traded companies and wrote opinion letters for hundreds of billions of shares of CMKX. My second question is, once the DOJ/SEC subpoenaed the Silver State Bank records was it their legal obligation to inform the lawyers for CMKX at that point, or could they hide the fraud they found. Was it not the legal duty of the Silver State Bank to stop this fraud as well? If need be can we subpoena who received these fraud records?
3. Given the DOJ/SEC clearly had the fraud records showing insiders of CMKX were committing fraud what were the DOJ/SEC permitted by law to allow to take place after that fact. If they were suppose to halt the stock and stop further fraud from occurring to protect the shareholders in CMKX and all it partner companies, then each and every transaction after that would have been part of a known fraud or would have been part of a sting operation, either way, beyond what is permitted by the DOJ/SEC rules. Was it not the DOJ/SEC's duty to stop these transactions and protect the shareholders in the other companies affected? In your opinion does each company affected by these fraudulent transactions and their shareholders have a cause for legal action as well as they were damaged in this operation, or do they have no recourse.
4. The DOJ ran a parallel investigation with the SEC, and later admitted that there was a grand jury in this case, and also said to Mark Faulk that their investigation had to come out of a grand jury. That should mean there had to be a grand jury in 2004 sealed from public as they were clearly investigating at this point. Mark Faulk stated that Timothy Vasquez brought back an investigation that he thought was dead, that whole investigation previous to Mr. Vasquez investigation has been kept from public to this day. Is that allowed given it hides the facts from the victims and given restitution for those victims in deals cut by those officials has not been awarded to the victims in a timely manner as per what the law required. In fact Mr. Hodges says he has an eye witness to the fact that the restitution should have been released over five years ago. Is it not the duty of the DOJ Ombudsman to depose Al Hodges witness to the facts, if necessary can we subpoena that witness?
5. Bill Frizzell states in an update that he is privy to the SEC file which has been given to Robert Maheu, Donald Stoecklein, and Urban Casavant. Mr. Frizzell stated in his derivative letter to the company that he was in possession of confidential banking records which he could not make public and that at the meeting to see the SEC file he had signed non disclosure with Urban Casavant and his lawyers. My question is, was it the legal duty of the DOJ/SEC to include the fraud records they had just subpoenaed, those records ended up being the basis for most of the actions by the DOJ, SEC, and the company, or were they allowed to hide the fact that Urban Casavant and John Edwards were just caught committing massive fraud and currently engaging in that fraud and laundering the proceeds and leave that information out of the file they were given. Is it possible to subpoena whether or not the Silver State Bank fraud record were part of the SEC file as that would prove whether Robert Maheu, Bill Frizzell, Don Stoecklein, and others worked the DOJ/SEC sting operation with Urban Casavant?
6. If you agree that the evidence clearly shows this was a sting operation that used CMKX and its shareholders as a pawn in that operation, I have a few more questions to ask regarding the legal duties of the DOJ/SEC to see to it our restitution is released as required by law. The questions here are questions I would like to ask to the DOJ Civil Rights Ombudsman, as in my opinion it is the Ombudsman’s legal duty to do what Al Hodges is attempting to do in his bivens case, trying to release the restitution held for the victims who were pawns in a DOJ/SEC sting operation. I would like your legal opinion on these questions including whether it is the Ombudsman’s duty to investigate these questions. Question one is, is it legal to run a sting operation using a publicly traded company and their shareholders as pawns in that operation and is it legal to have that sting affect several other publicly traded companies and their shareholders?
7. Mr. Hodges claims in his bivens case that the DOJ/SEC have told CMKX officials that release of this fund was imminent on many occasions, but this was not true. Is it legal to have secret negotiations to take place regarding our restitution, and is it legal for the DOJ/SEC to lie to company officials about the release of their money. Does that not violate the rights of the victims and should the DOJ Ombudsman be required by law to investigate the facts surrounding these negotiations. Can we subpoena these officials if need be?
8. Reece Hamilton, plaintiff in Mr. Hodges bivens case, has claimed that Mr. Hodges trustee received the codes from the authorities to release our restitution on or about DEC 30/31 2009, and that the taxes were taken out at that time. That was later confirmed by Mr. Hodges, and the tax issue confirmed in a complaint to AG of New York Andrew Cuomo, which is in the evidence package. Did giving our trustee the codes and having them not work violate our victim’s rights, and should it be the duty of the DOJ Ombudsman to investigate the officials who gave those codes and why they didn’t work. Can we subpoena this evidence if need be?
9. Mr. Hodges in an update to his plaintiffs has said that he hears that the DOJ signed off on the distribution of our money that his trustee is in constructive control of that money. He has said he has eye witnesses who have seen the packages coming to all shareholders with their restitution in it. Although Mr. Hodges’ trustee has control over our restitution at this time the DOJ/SEC will still not allow the release of this fund. Those packages again have not been delivered as promised. Is it the legal duty of the DOJ Ombudsman to investigate the eye witnesses who have seen these packages? Can we subpoena those officials who are negotiating the release of our trust fund if necessary?
10. Mr. Hodges claims to have first hand knowledge that the fund containing the restitution for all CMKX bona fide shareholders was not released as it was attached to the World Global Settlements. That seems to be a violation of the victim’s rights who are not even aware of this event. Is it the legal duty of the DOJ Ombudsman to investigate CMKX being attached to the World Global Settlements and Al Hodges direct knowledge of this? Is it possible to subpoena this evidence if need be
We are the CMKX Shareholders Coalition for Justice; I represent only those that want the truth, whatever that may be. I respect that you are willing to take on this case as I have talked to many who were not. I am in the process of writing a complaint to be filed regarding the violation of all CMKX bona fide shareholders victims’ rights. I have corresponded with the DOJ Victims Rights Ombudsman; their office said I should file a complaint against the DOJ involved in our particular case, so Nevada.
In this report by Mark Faulk, former CEO of CMKM Diamonds, he verifies what was already in public, that the DOJ/SEC had in fact subpoenaed the Silver State Bank. The date he mentions in this article is Sept 5th 2004; he then chronicles the fraud the DOJ/SEC allowed to happen along with the Silver State Bank:
“That on or about the 5th day of September 2004 the bank was served with a subpoena with regard to accounts maintained at the branch plaintiff supervised. Certain executives of defendants (Silver State Bancorp, Silver State Bank) owned stock in companies controlled by the subject of the subpoena and became disconcerted when the bank was served with the aforementioned subpoena.”
thenakedtruthbook.com/?p=24
The rest of the article from Mark Faulk explains the details of what happened after the DOJ/SEC were fully aware of the fraud happening and simply watched as the fraud continued and in fact allowed fraud to continue in several other companies related to CMKX. It was clearly their duty to stop the fraud on Sept 5th 2004 and protect the investors of CMKX:
“But a little diamond mining company from Canada that turned out to be the biggest penny stock fraud in history might become a major problem for McCain’s campaign as well. Insiders with CMKX defrauded over 50,000 shareholders of in excess of $250 million. A large portion of that money was run through a single Silver State Bank branch in Las Vegas. In all, former CMKX CEO Urban Casavant and reputed mastermind John Edwards (no, not that John Edwards) opened over 100 bank accounts at Silver State, and ran tens of millions of dollars through the bank.
In one multi-million dollar gamble taken by Silver State Bank, they accepted not just one but four checks for $2.5 million dollars each from a fraudulent company account at Wells Fargo Bank in Las Vegas in one week…written on temporary checks. John Edwards opened an account for a company called Saint George Metals on the same day that CMKM Diamonds announced a “business partnership” with the company, which in reality was just a bank account whose only signor was John Edwards. Edwards would write a $2.5 million check to CMKM Diamonds on a temporary check from Wells Fargo, and Urban Casavant would deposit it the “official” company account at Silver State Bank and write a press release announcing the investment. In turn, money was filtered back to Edwards either in illegally issued company stock or cash, essentially making the exchange a wash. To Silver State Bank’s credit, they at least wrote “HOLD” across one of the deposits, apparently waiting for the $2.5 million temporary check to clear before crediting the CMKM Diamonds’ account.
This was not an isolated case, but was instead the normal way of doing business with Casavant, Edwards, and their cohorts. It was an incredible whirlwind of activity for Silver State Bank and other Las Vegas banks, including Wells Fargo, Nevada State, and Sun West Bank. Hundreds of checks, wire transfers, and deposits totaling tens of millions and possibly hundreds of millions of dollars flowed like champagne in the Vegas casinos.
Among the transactions executed by Silver State Bank:
• Wire transfers totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars were executed with only the notation “transferring to Personal Acct. per cust. transfer via phone”.
• Checks from the CMKXtreme and other accounts controlled by Casavant and Edwaerds written out only to “CASH”…including one for $350,000.
• Multi-million dollar wire transfers between Edwards and Urban, run through one of the almost 100 accounts they controlled there.
• Millions of dollars written out of company accounts to Urban, his wife Carolyn, and several family members, often on temporary checks.
The scam finally came crashing down in late 2005 when the SEC finally delisted CMKX, and a shareholder named Kevin West was appointed by Urban to take over while Casavant fled to Canada. West inherited a company with no tangible assets, no real business…and $558 in the bank. Edwards, Casavant, and their cohorts had stolen the rest. West brought in Bill Frizzell, an attorney from Tyler, Texas, who had been conducting a multi-year investigation into CMKX for a shareholders’ group.
They have since filed numerous lawsuits against Edwards, Casavant, and others, and have subpoenaed records from Silver State Bank and other banks associated with the scam in an ongoing effort to recover assets for the defrauded shareholders. The SEC recently filed charges against eleven individuals and three companies in the CMKX case, but a multi-year investigation by a task force comprised of the DOJ, FBI, and IRS has yet to produce any arrests or charges.
Silver State Bank has not been charged in the CMKM Diamonds case, although they did fire an employee named Patricia DeCosta, who approved most of the transactions. DeCosta in turn filed a lawsuit in early 2006 against her former employer, detailing her side of the story:
That on or about the 5th day of September 2004 the bank was served with a subpoena with regard to accounts maintained at the branch plaintiff supervised. Certain executives of defendants (Silver State Bancorp, Silver State Bank) owned stock in companies controlled by the subject of the subpoena and became disconcerted when the bank was served with the aforementioned subpoena.
The fact remains that Silver State Bank never filed a single Suspicious Activities Report (SARS) while 50,000 CMKX shareholders lost their entire investments.
The evidence above is at the heart of my complaint I am filing on behalf of all CMKX bona fide share holder. The DOJ/SEC either allowed CMKX to get destroyed for their investigation, or it was a sting, either way our victim’s rights have been violated.
I represent those that simply want the truth, good or bad. I would appreciate if you could answer the questions I have included and hopefully back the report I am sending in to the DOJ Ombudsman for Victims Rights. In areas I am wrong I would appreciate the truth and will edited areas where I have made mistakes or not file the report at all.
There are very pertinent legal questions that can clear the picture for all CMKX shareholders who are victims in this case. The answer, in my opinion, actually points to the fact that the DOJ Victims Rights Ombudsman should be doing what Al Hodges is doing. The restitution for all victims in this case was already collected, that is clear as none of the brokers who were caught have been included in an actions currently ongoing whatsoever. They obviously made the deals talked about by Al Hodges, and our own company obviously knows about these deals and has to pretend they don’t due to non disclosure, or it would appear that way in my opinion by the evidence I am presenting to you. It is clear to me that the operation Mr. Hodges explains did in fact occur, and given the evidence will corroborate that if subpoenaed, there are many ramifications to that fact becoming public.
The coalition will be a client that contributes more than the minimum if you can accommodate our request.
Thanks in advance, David Nelson.
Here is a list of legal questions I have researched the answer to but need a clear statement from a professional to give credibility to the report going into the DOJ Victims Rights Ombudsman. Each question will relate to the attached report:
1. Mark Faulk stated that the Silver Stank Bank, which was the majority of the evidence used in the company’s, DOJ, and SEC’s actions, was subpoenaed on Sept 5th 2004. At that time it was clear that insiders of CMKX were selling unregistered shares and laundering the money through that bank. In discussions with SEC officials I was told that at the moment they determine with evidence that fraud is being committed it is the SEC legal duty to halt the stock from trading and stop the fraud and protect the investors from further harm. Was the DOJ/SEC permitted to allow the fraud to continue to for the sake of their investigation if it harmed the shareholders, or was the DOJ/SEC allowed to use CMKX and its shareholders as a vehicle in a sting operation and hide that fact from them?
2. The DOJ/SEC after subpoenaing the fraud activity did not halt CMKX from trading; in fact in evidence produced they allowed all John Edwards fraudulent trades after this subpoena and per phone records were contacted on each transaction. They allowed Urban Casavant to write checks worth millions after this subpoena, the Silver State bank, although knowing they were subpoenaed allowed the fraud to continue, and lawyer for CMKX Roger Glenn continued to follow through with deals with other publicly traded companies and wrote opinion letters for hundreds of billions of shares of CMKX. My second question is, once the DOJ/SEC subpoenaed the Silver State Bank records was it their legal obligation to inform the lawyers for CMKX at that point, or could they hide the fraud they found. Was it not the legal duty of the Silver State Bank to stop this fraud as well? If need be can we subpoena who received these fraud records?
3. Given the DOJ/SEC clearly had the fraud records showing insiders of CMKX were committing fraud what were the DOJ/SEC permitted by law to allow to take place after that fact. If they were suppose to halt the stock and stop further fraud from occurring to protect the shareholders in CMKX and all it partner companies, then each and every transaction after that would have been part of a known fraud or would have been part of a sting operation, either way, beyond what is permitted by the DOJ/SEC rules. Was it not the DOJ/SEC's duty to stop these transactions and protect the shareholders in the other companies affected? In your opinion does each company affected by these fraudulent transactions and their shareholders have a cause for legal action as well as they were damaged in this operation, or do they have no recourse.
4. The DOJ ran a parallel investigation with the SEC, and later admitted that there was a grand jury in this case, and also said to Mark Faulk that their investigation had to come out of a grand jury. That should mean there had to be a grand jury in 2004 sealed from public as they were clearly investigating at this point. Mark Faulk stated that Timothy Vasquez brought back an investigation that he thought was dead, that whole investigation previous to Mr. Vasquez investigation has been kept from public to this day. Is that allowed given it hides the facts from the victims and given restitution for those victims in deals cut by those officials has not been awarded to the victims in a timely manner as per what the law required. In fact Mr. Hodges says he has an eye witness to the fact that the restitution should have been released over five years ago. Is it not the duty of the DOJ Ombudsman to depose Al Hodges witness to the facts, if necessary can we subpoena that witness?
5. Bill Frizzell states in an update that he is privy to the SEC file which has been given to Robert Maheu, Donald Stoecklein, and Urban Casavant. Mr. Frizzell stated in his derivative letter to the company that he was in possession of confidential banking records which he could not make public and that at the meeting to see the SEC file he had signed non disclosure with Urban Casavant and his lawyers. My question is, was it the legal duty of the DOJ/SEC to include the fraud records they had just subpoenaed, those records ended up being the basis for most of the actions by the DOJ, SEC, and the company, or were they allowed to hide the fact that Urban Casavant and John Edwards were just caught committing massive fraud and currently engaging in that fraud and laundering the proceeds and leave that information out of the file they were given. Is it possible to subpoena whether or not the Silver State Bank fraud record were part of the SEC file as that would prove whether Robert Maheu, Bill Frizzell, Don Stoecklein, and others worked the DOJ/SEC sting operation with Urban Casavant?
6. If you agree that the evidence clearly shows this was a sting operation that used CMKX and its shareholders as a pawn in that operation, I have a few more questions to ask regarding the legal duties of the DOJ/SEC to see to it our restitution is released as required by law. The questions here are questions I would like to ask to the DOJ Civil Rights Ombudsman, as in my opinion it is the Ombudsman’s legal duty to do what Al Hodges is attempting to do in his bivens case, trying to release the restitution held for the victims who were pawns in a DOJ/SEC sting operation. I would like your legal opinion on these questions including whether it is the Ombudsman’s duty to investigate these questions. Question one is, is it legal to run a sting operation using a publicly traded company and their shareholders as pawns in that operation and is it legal to have that sting affect several other publicly traded companies and their shareholders?
7. Mr. Hodges claims in his bivens case that the DOJ/SEC have told CMKX officials that release of this fund was imminent on many occasions, but this was not true. Is it legal to have secret negotiations to take place regarding our restitution, and is it legal for the DOJ/SEC to lie to company officials about the release of their money. Does that not violate the rights of the victims and should the DOJ Ombudsman be required by law to investigate the facts surrounding these negotiations. Can we subpoena these officials if need be?
8. Reece Hamilton, plaintiff in Mr. Hodges bivens case, has claimed that Mr. Hodges trustee received the codes from the authorities to release our restitution on or about DEC 30/31 2009, and that the taxes were taken out at that time. That was later confirmed by Mr. Hodges, and the tax issue confirmed in a complaint to AG of New York Andrew Cuomo, which is in the evidence package. Did giving our trustee the codes and having them not work violate our victim’s rights, and should it be the duty of the DOJ Ombudsman to investigate the officials who gave those codes and why they didn’t work. Can we subpoena this evidence if need be?
9. Mr. Hodges in an update to his plaintiffs has said that he hears that the DOJ signed off on the distribution of our money that his trustee is in constructive control of that money. He has said he has eye witnesses who have seen the packages coming to all shareholders with their restitution in it. Although Mr. Hodges’ trustee has control over our restitution at this time the DOJ/SEC will still not allow the release of this fund. Those packages again have not been delivered as promised. Is it the legal duty of the DOJ Ombudsman to investigate the eye witnesses who have seen these packages? Can we subpoena those officials who are negotiating the release of our trust fund if necessary?
10. Mr. Hodges claims to have first hand knowledge that the fund containing the restitution for all CMKX bona fide shareholders was not released as it was attached to the World Global Settlements. That seems to be a violation of the victim’s rights who are not even aware of this event. Is it the legal duty of the DOJ Ombudsman to investigate CMKX being attached to the World Global Settlements and Al Hodges direct knowledge of this? Is it possible to subpoena this evidence if need be