Post by porthos on May 5, 2011 20:17:15 GMT -5
Hi there, this is Vol. III of what is the overwhelming amount of collected information from the most vocal plaintiff of them all Mr. Hollenegg. This information is being presented in answer to Hollenegg's question...
...Ishmel.
Where or who are you connected in the information chain that you can claim 100% truth in the statements you are posting like ''bhollenegg ...poorly misled''?
Thank you,
BHollenegg
____________________________________-
It has been shown that just one person can explain and present overwhelming documented misinformation. The dance continues with the likes of others who will distract attention from any question us sustenance. Read the 8 pages of the Vol I thread and see if any of the good questions asked by the "bashers" gets answered.
Well, here is one thing Bob can't dance around. In that very thread of Vol.I (the same one that got Ishmel a months vacation) Joerocks interrupts the conversation with saying that Bob showed him evidence of Peter Maheu's involvement.
2 Things...
1.) That had nothing to do with anything once so ever. Ishmel was making an argument of our interest being represented by Att. Hodges. What that has to do with PM's statements is beyond my comprehension. (needed to point that out; think what you will)
2.) Bob, why is it that you think it's a good idea to distribute confidential information. Do you understand what confidential means? Or am I missing something. I've asked you this question multiple times. I would appreciate an answer. It's been proved that you and other Plaintiffs have purposely leaked information that pertains to 50 Thousand other peoples interest. You may seen like a real cool guy doing it, might earn alot of trust doing it, but could you please STOP!!! It hasn't benefited one shareholder since you started.
You must understand that this isn't just your privilege to do so. What your doing is wrong. Leaking information isn't informing the shareholders it is damaging us. You should know this. And why Hodges continues to give you anything is beyond me. If I was your attorney I would have cut you off a long time ago. This is all too strange Bob. Too Strange.
Too many people including my self can say that we were given very confidential information. Sheila used to do conference calls with firefighters in S. Florida for goodness sakes. Yep, I was there for one of them.
So if you sir, are still wondering why I think you've been misinformed...
....look at 3 volumes of documented information that answer your question.
Bob, you've been misinformed. Just admit it. Getting Past denial will be the first step to recovering whats left.
...Ishmel.
Where or who are you connected in the information chain that you can claim 100% truth in the statements you are posting like ''bhollenegg ...poorly misled''?
Thank you,
BHollenegg
____________________________________-
It has been shown that just one person can explain and present overwhelming documented misinformation. The dance continues with the likes of others who will distract attention from any question us sustenance. Read the 8 pages of the Vol I thread and see if any of the good questions asked by the "bashers" gets answered.
Well, here is one thing Bob can't dance around. In that very thread of Vol.I (the same one that got Ishmel a months vacation) Joerocks interrupts the conversation with saying that Bob showed him evidence of Peter Maheu's involvement.
2 Things...
1.) That had nothing to do with anything once so ever. Ishmel was making an argument of our interest being represented by Att. Hodges. What that has to do with PM's statements is beyond my comprehension. (needed to point that out; think what you will)
2.) Bob, why is it that you think it's a good idea to distribute confidential information. Do you understand what confidential means? Or am I missing something. I've asked you this question multiple times. I would appreciate an answer. It's been proved that you and other Plaintiffs have purposely leaked information that pertains to 50 Thousand other peoples interest. You may seen like a real cool guy doing it, might earn alot of trust doing it, but could you please STOP!!! It hasn't benefited one shareholder since you started.
You must understand that this isn't just your privilege to do so. What your doing is wrong. Leaking information isn't informing the shareholders it is damaging us. You should know this. And why Hodges continues to give you anything is beyond me. If I was your attorney I would have cut you off a long time ago. This is all too strange Bob. Too Strange.
Too many people including my self can say that we were given very confidential information. Sheila used to do conference calls with firefighters in S. Florida for goodness sakes. Yep, I was there for one of them.
So if you sir, are still wondering why I think you've been misinformed...
....look at 3 volumes of documented information that answer your question.
Bob, you've been misinformed. Just admit it. Getting Past denial will be the first step to recovering whats left.
