Post by gotcmkxdiamonds on May 8, 2011 13:16:57 GMT -5
1:52 PM) vegashousehunter_1: Bob,
It was a few years ago that yourself and AH were teamed together, working to locate our settlement trust and the focus at that time was on the DTCC. I believe that a DTCC staffer (forget his name) had admitted to some posters - ChrisL and others over a speakerphone -
that a CMKX Trust existed, but later on the staffer claimed he misspoke and denied that the DTCC had the trust or that it even existed.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you and AH then decide to put your collaborative search on hold for a while?
Some months passed and Al Hodges then recruited 7 plaintiffs together and filed the Bivens Action, claiming that a trust of $3.87 trillion was being withheld from us by the SEC. Obviously, it looks like AH found evidence of the trust, gathered the plaintiffs together, and then filed the Bivens Action.
Did AH ever tell you on what basis he believed that the trust existed?
2. Did he say that others told him about the trust, and that's how he came about this information?
. Though he's never provided any plaintiff with proof, did AH tell you that he personally saw evidence of the trust and that he based the Bivens Action on this evidence? Just looking to piece together what may have happened during the time period when your collaboration with AH was put on hold, and when AH filed the Bivens Action
Because it's during this period of time when AH may've discovered the existence of the trust.
Thanks Bob!
Bob's response: Hello Dicek,
Your questions are very good, but require a considerable amount of background explanation. An abbreviated response would open up more questions and misinterpretations. The fact that we are about to finish our journey,
do not feel it is prudent or constructive to provide these details at this stage. There are entities who are not working in the best interest of the Shareholders. The ones working on releasing the funds to the shareholders have been threatened with lawsuits. I was contacted by an attorney who said he would take me to court unless we
1. Provide information what Attorney Hodges has and what he is doing...
2. Pay the Attorney and his friends and they will go away.
I am focused on providing what updates I can to the Shareholders of the present and future situation as long as the information does not jeopardize or cause any delays in releasing the funds to the shareholders.
Thank you Dicek for your understanding ,
BHollenegg
It was a few years ago that yourself and AH were teamed together, working to locate our settlement trust and the focus at that time was on the DTCC. I believe that a DTCC staffer (forget his name) had admitted to some posters - ChrisL and others over a speakerphone -
that a CMKX Trust existed, but later on the staffer claimed he misspoke and denied that the DTCC had the trust or that it even existed.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you and AH then decide to put your collaborative search on hold for a while?
Some months passed and Al Hodges then recruited 7 plaintiffs together and filed the Bivens Action, claiming that a trust of $3.87 trillion was being withheld from us by the SEC. Obviously, it looks like AH found evidence of the trust, gathered the plaintiffs together, and then filed the Bivens Action.
Did AH ever tell you on what basis he believed that the trust existed?
2. Did he say that others told him about the trust, and that's how he came about this information?
. Though he's never provided any plaintiff with proof, did AH tell you that he personally saw evidence of the trust and that he based the Bivens Action on this evidence? Just looking to piece together what may have happened during the time period when your collaboration with AH was put on hold, and when AH filed the Bivens Action
Because it's during this period of time when AH may've discovered the existence of the trust.
Thanks Bob!
Bob's response: Hello Dicek,
Your questions are very good, but require a considerable amount of background explanation. An abbreviated response would open up more questions and misinterpretations. The fact that we are about to finish our journey,
do not feel it is prudent or constructive to provide these details at this stage. There are entities who are not working in the best interest of the Shareholders. The ones working on releasing the funds to the shareholders have been threatened with lawsuits. I was contacted by an attorney who said he would take me to court unless we
1. Provide information what Attorney Hodges has and what he is doing...
2. Pay the Attorney and his friends and they will go away.
I am focused on providing what updates I can to the Shareholders of the present and future situation as long as the information does not jeopardize or cause any delays in releasing the funds to the shareholders.
Thank you Dicek for your understanding ,
BHollenegg