Post by digby on Aug 26, 2007 8:31:03 GMT -5
By: jay_adobe
25 Aug 2007, 07:23 PM EDT
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=595099
Can’t have it both ways.
Can’t say there are no assets and then sue assets.
Can’t say there is no trust and then sue a trust.
Can’t say there is no trust and then freeze a trust.
Can’t say there is no money and then freeze an account.
Can’t say there will be a phone, fax, and office, then fail to do so, and expect respect, trust, and confidence.
Can’t say the naked short is 2+ trillion and then say there is no naked short.
Can’t name attorneys and forensic experts, and then say it is not prudent to name names.
Can’t justify the amount of time it takes to file an 82 page TRO in a couple days, and then take months to answer 13 very vague ‘shareholder’ questions.
Can’t say you are working all day every day on issues, but not provide simple factual updates in a timely manner. Is there something any more important in the world than to answer the phone from a caller who might be a shareholder that is the greatest asset the company owns? Without the shareholders, the company would not have a reason to exist, but that same group of shareholders appears to be so unimportant as to not deserve even a volunteer IR person.
Can’t state there is no plan, when all along every corporate action begets a plan of action in anticipation for the next action and the next action…
Can’t state there is no plan, and know where you are heading in business without a Business Plan to guide you; thus, there must be a plan in existence.
Can’t state there is no money for an IR, when on 4/5/07 the lack of IR was announced, long before the 7 boxes were delivered identifying and claiming the lack of corporate funds.
Can’t state that there is no trust, but you can state that you don’t know of the existence of a trust.
Can’t state there is no money, but hire attorneys across the country (3/30/07) prior to the discovery of the $558 account. With what funds were they retained prior to the ‘7 box delivery’?
Can’t state on 3/30/07 “…the communication issues have been eliminated” and ask for trust, and then continue in the same manner to fail to communicate the will of the shareholders, who are the owners of the company.
Can’t claim that the goal is to place value in the Company, but fail to hire a qualified assayer to observe the core samples. Why observe core samples if it is stated that no assets exist? Would not core samples be an asset?
Can’t claim to be so short of money, but be able to fly to Canada to observe core samples, only to fail to hire a geologist to opine on the core samples’ value. A prudent leader would ensure that a qualified person was on site upon arrival, and would hire such prior to boarding a plane for the international flight. Anything other than that would be wasting corporate funds, or would it?
Can’t state that we are going to trade again without exposing and identifying a plan of action or an asset that is tradable. What possible asset, which you claim doesn’t exist, might be recoverable to the point of gaining enough value to allow a company to trade its 703+ billion shares again? Who will buy shares based on the assertion that there is no asset and that nonexistent asset doesn’t even have a value placed on it?
My thoughts about our company are well documented and known. Nothing has changed that. I believe we are in good hands and have been for quite a long time.
IMO
25 Aug 2007, 07:23 PM EDT
ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=595099
Can’t have it both ways.
Can’t say there are no assets and then sue assets.
Can’t say there is no trust and then sue a trust.
Can’t say there is no trust and then freeze a trust.
Can’t say there is no money and then freeze an account.
Can’t say there will be a phone, fax, and office, then fail to do so, and expect respect, trust, and confidence.
Can’t say the naked short is 2+ trillion and then say there is no naked short.
Can’t name attorneys and forensic experts, and then say it is not prudent to name names.
Can’t justify the amount of time it takes to file an 82 page TRO in a couple days, and then take months to answer 13 very vague ‘shareholder’ questions.
Can’t say you are working all day every day on issues, but not provide simple factual updates in a timely manner. Is there something any more important in the world than to answer the phone from a caller who might be a shareholder that is the greatest asset the company owns? Without the shareholders, the company would not have a reason to exist, but that same group of shareholders appears to be so unimportant as to not deserve even a volunteer IR person.
Can’t state there is no plan, when all along every corporate action begets a plan of action in anticipation for the next action and the next action…
Can’t state there is no plan, and know where you are heading in business without a Business Plan to guide you; thus, there must be a plan in existence.
Can’t state there is no money for an IR, when on 4/5/07 the lack of IR was announced, long before the 7 boxes were delivered identifying and claiming the lack of corporate funds.
Can’t state that there is no trust, but you can state that you don’t know of the existence of a trust.
Can’t state there is no money, but hire attorneys across the country (3/30/07) prior to the discovery of the $558 account. With what funds were they retained prior to the ‘7 box delivery’?
Can’t state on 3/30/07 “…the communication issues have been eliminated” and ask for trust, and then continue in the same manner to fail to communicate the will of the shareholders, who are the owners of the company.
Can’t claim that the goal is to place value in the Company, but fail to hire a qualified assayer to observe the core samples. Why observe core samples if it is stated that no assets exist? Would not core samples be an asset?
Can’t claim to be so short of money, but be able to fly to Canada to observe core samples, only to fail to hire a geologist to opine on the core samples’ value. A prudent leader would ensure that a qualified person was on site upon arrival, and would hire such prior to boarding a plane for the international flight. Anything other than that would be wasting corporate funds, or would it?
Can’t state that we are going to trade again without exposing and identifying a plan of action or an asset that is tradable. What possible asset, which you claim doesn’t exist, might be recoverable to the point of gaining enough value to allow a company to trade its 703+ billion shares again? Who will buy shares based on the assertion that there is no asset and that nonexistent asset doesn’t even have a value placed on it?
My thoughts about our company are well documented and known. Nothing has changed that. I believe we are in good hands and have been for quite a long time.
IMO
