|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 9:52:24 GMT -5
oldepro DIAMOND MINER Why? ? « Thread Started Today at 9:06am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Why has Patrick Byrne been the one to shoulder the load? Why has there never been a call from our company to bombard the SEC and Congress with protests from shareholders? Why has our new CEO, a proponent of market reform, not asked us to take up arms? In December 2006, I asked Kevin West "will you call on the shareholders to protest if needed." "Absolutely" he replied. Why did this call never come? Why have we been lulled to sleep by false promises from false prophets? Why has there been a 5 year campaign to keep us confused and disorganized? Why, with all the possibilities for positive action from the Paltalk rooms and message boards, were we fed "we won" and "next week"? Why did the sliver platter end up with Urban's head on it? Final question, Why are we still putting up with it? millionaires.proboards86.com/inde....ay&thread=22747
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 9:52:59 GMT -5
elrac DIAMOND DIGGER Bud Burrell interview « Thread Started Yesterday at 5:03pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a good program.....Bud has a interview in which he talks about how we got in this mess.Also talks about NSS and its not just stocks its happening too! Don Coxe interview will be of interest to people worried about future metal prices.Hang in to the 25 minute mark when they get into metals. www.financialsense.com/fsn/main.html silverbulletgirl DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD Re: Bud Burrell interview « Reply #1 Today at 8:51am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bud Burrell Topic: What's Wrong with This Picture? October 11, 2008 Select an Audio Format Real Player WinAmp Windows Media Mp3 Mr. Bud Burrell has extensive experience working with major brokerage firms on the trading desk and arbitrage desk with almost 30 years experience -- Industry authority, expert, Wall Street veteran. Love him or hate him, you will always know where he stands - his no-holds-barred style and frank honesty make his blogs a must read, from one of the originals. View his landmark correspondences in The Bud Files. www.financialsense.com/Experts/2008/Burrell.html millionaires.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=22738
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 18:21:50 GMT -5
gery61 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: *If you "BELIEVE", please keep this thread ali « Reply #383 Today at 5:36am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi all, i believe in enormous richness in the next few weeks and the masterminds (byrnes, buffet, gates, glenn, maheu, stocklein imho) have formed the incredible delicious plate for the dinner time. relax, enjoy, all the best gery 61 millionaires.proboards86.com/inde....d=19853&page=20
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 18:22:42 GMT -5
By: aladin99 12 Oct 2008, 01:45 PM EDT Msg. 771840 of 771852 Jump to msg. # Did KW also say this 8 months ago and 3 years after CKMX was revoked??? ~CMKX HAS acquired assets to allow it to trade....~
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 18:23:13 GMT -5
TheRealJBond DIAMOND JEDI Re: sec is trying to prove they are not to blame « Reply #5 Today at 12:10pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a DEFENSIVE action from OUR OFFENSE...Those that doubt that we can actually make anything happen this is PROOF. This is exactly why we as shareholders need to get these complaints filed with the lawfirm....Just look at how they want to shift the blame...Thus shifting the liability and exposure....Just call it a FLUSH OUT...however we will be the ones flushing.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 18:24:01 GMT -5
Thanks single...
superfun63 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Who is Acca « Reply #84 Today at 12:47pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The way I see things is Urban hires Acca to keep shareholders together. So if Urban is a crook and guilty of all the things Kevin says he is, then why in the world would Urban want us all to stay together? He would want this base to fracture and go away, would he not?
Now we have Tyler, supposedly set up by Urban, right? Tyler is anti-Urban all the way. Why? My guess is that all this was set up to keep us busy fighting over who's right and who's wrong. Keep us busy and you keep us together or at least keep us interested so we wouldn't just go away. Because they knew it was going to take so much time to get this done that shareholders would just move on.
A friend of mine and fellow shareholder says he believes they won't pay us. I keep reminding him that they have to pay us, thanks to Maheu. He set the trap and locked us in. I just don't see how this can just go away. When will we be paid? I don't know. But with all that is happening in the stock market and financial world, I would guess it won't be long now.
Why do I keep faith in all of this? Because no one has iron clad proven we won't get paid. I just keep thinking of all the big names associated with this, from the SEC at first saying there is no such thing as naked shorting to now it's all over the news, from proven big dollar diamond fields all around our claims, from big time investment banks going belly up all of a sudden, etc. etc. I could go on but I'm tired of typing, lol.
Bottom line is this, ACCA is here so we won't lose faith that we will get that hugh roi we're all hoping for and that's the way I see it.
aimho
Superfun
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 18:25:16 GMT -5
By: grajekk 12 Oct 2008, 08:03 AM EDT Msg. 771806 of 771809 Jump to msg. # Hey Ron Casavant... I don't know if you remember me or not.. I don't even know if you ever look at this board. But I was the 3XXX guy who drove from Southern Wis. to the Brainerd races to try and help out CMKX a few years ago with the aerial survey company stock symbol that turned out to be a piece of spit. By the way, thanks for the 2XX teeshirt... When I got home it was 3XXX! LOL! Sorry the stock symbols we exchanged both turned out to be stinkers! During our visit you pointed to the zinc properties on the claims map and told me they were worth over a B by themselves. The rest of the map was covered with CMKX diamond claims. Do you remember the smiles, laughter, and dreams we had? You told me you had to lose a few pounds so you could drive a top fuel car the next year. JamesXXXXX was there that day, a shareholder in from Cal, and a really nice guy from Pittsburgh also.. can't remember his name though.. I thought it was one of the best days in my life... I think I owe Big Jim Dunn's wife about 30 cookies from that day. Well... now the laughter is gone, most of my hope is gone too, I have a terrible guilt for getting my friends and relatives involved in this mess even though I told them to use gambling money only, and I don't know if it is posssible to shake a man's hand again and trust him... I don't care about the dreams anymore because a lot of stuff went south over the last couple years and that's mostly because I took such good care of myself along the way, and let some stress get to me! lol!.. But, on the top of my bucket list is the need to know whether you told me the truth that weekend... Were we really destined to be as happy as we thought we were at that time? Or should I tell my children not to trust anyone in this life? They have already seen how the US government works, so maybe I don't have to say a word about not trusting... I still pray every night that the smile and wink you gave me, when we parted was because of the good will and love in your family, and not laughter at taking a few bucks from a gullible dreamer who wanted to find a way to give his family the best he could.. Strange... I guess I still believe in Santa... Don't let me down.. One quick request if I may.. Ask whoever is in charge of this stuff now, just to let this be over... Even if you folks did take me and 50,000 others for a ride, at least let us have closure. If you folks are the people I thought you were from the get-go, then God bless you! And I can't wait until the sacred asskicking day of the naked shorts! lol! The only thing keeping my attitude semi-positive, and my body on the green side of the sod, is that I can't afford to pay for my funeral yet, and my kids think I'm to big to get rid of in the fire pit in my back yard. Still hoping for that party in Vegas, and the Golden Rule to win! If something doesn't happen pretty soon though, we may have to move the party to an old folks home in the Bahama's! Still wishing you and your family the very best, until I am given reason not to! LOL! Take care my friend... One more before I go.. If there is still hope for us dreamers, could you folks rent another billboard at the next NASCAR race and just put a big smiley face on it? We'll know! LOL! By: jlecks 12 Oct 2008, 04:23 PM EDT Msg. 771857 of 771863 (This msg. is a reply to 771806 by grajekk.) Jump to msg. # Grajekk, Interesting post and thanks for sharing; most of us stuck here can relate to your feelings and sentiments. You should ask "Granny" on some of the other boards (at one time I believe she held {probably still does} the record for being a Moderator on more CMKX-related boards than any other person in the history of this stock). She used to brag she was best friends with Ron and had his private phone number and would talk to him when she wanted. Maybe she can help with some truthfulness and clarity, for once. GLTUA
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 18:27:17 GMT -5
trillionaire1 DIAMOND DIGGER Federal Reserve / Treasury Contact Info « Thread Started Today at 5:41pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.federalreserve.gov/Feedback.cfmBe sure to mention CMKX and how they need to fix the naked shorting. If there was ever a time to write, then it is now!!! trillionaire1 DIAMOND DIGGER Re: Federal Reserve Contact Info « Reply #1 Today at 5:48pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is the contact page for the Treasury also. They are the ones who have the 700 Billion that can help us. www.treas.gov/contacts.shtml millionaires.proboards86.com/inde....ay&thread=22754
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 18:34:19 GMT -5
tuscansun DIAMOND JEDI MASTER Re: sec is trying to prove they are not to blame « Reply #8 Today at 3:30pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is EXACTLY where we wanted / needed to be.... we are NOW seeing the defensive action of the SEC... as they try to make Joe Public impressed with ALL they have done in the past years. Its our time .......... we can watch them pretend its theirs... millionaires.proboards86.com/inde....ay&thread=22739
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 18:46:53 GMT -5
By: aladin99 12 Oct 2008, 03:29 PM EDT Msg. 771850 of 771910 Jump to msg. # Shorts will shake hard before they die...based on laws of nature.... By: aladin99 12 Oct 2008, 03:41 PM EDT Msg. 771851 of 771911 Jump to msg. # Shorts & Naked shorts will be banned altogether then D/A bashers will be gone automatically....
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 18:53:01 GMT -5
By: my69z 12 Oct 2008, 06:29 PM EDT Msg. 771890 of 771913 Jump to msg. # MP3..Steintzman/Liston/SEC..... www.zshare.net/audio/20437460b1240cf5/ 35 mins Chris By: my69z 12 Oct 2008, 08:30 PM EDT Msg. 34827 of 34827 (This msg. is a reply to 34825 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # Entg just proved they have no case against CMKX with their latest filing.......in case anyone still thought they did Their own comments on the money due to 1010 makes their complaint against CMKX mute lmao
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 12, 2008 21:34:38 GMT -5
By: chrisl_4_sale 12 Oct 2008, 08:22 PM EDT Msg. 771940 of 771946 Jump to msg. # Why is the company withholding this information from bonafide shareholders? What benefit is it to them?
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:00:57 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 12 Oct 2008, 01:41 PM EDT Msg. 771837 of 772208 Jump to msg. # I don't get this Viashow suit
Case 08-A-569762-C Status ACTIVE Plaintiff CMKM Diamonds Inc Attorney Koch, David R. Defendant Viashow Inc Attorney Ryan, Thomas G. Judge Vega, Valorie J. Dept. 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Event 10/07/2008 at 09:00 AM DEFT'S MTN TO CONSOLIDATE WITH A569615/02 Heard By Gates, Lee A Parties 0001 - P1 CMKM Diamonds Inc No 0002 - D1 Viashow Inc No 0003 - D Durr, Nicole No 0004 - P Pecevich, Stephen No 0005 - P MDW And GRW 2000 Irrevocable Trust No
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEFT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE WITH A569762...DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
There being no opposition, COURT ORDERED, Motion to Consolidate GRANTED. Counsel argued fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation should be dismissed as they have not been plead properly. COURT ORDERED, Plaintiff to amend causes of action with more particularity. Counsel further argued regarding unjust enrichment claim advising of no disagreement about contract. Mr. Spear advised willing to forgo it at this time. COURT SO NOTED. Counsel inquired of conversion claim against Viashow. COURT ORDERED, motion GRANTED.
By: calvinwinters 13 Oct 2008, 05:36 AM EDT Msg. 772012 of 772208 (This msg. is a reply to 771837 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # goodolboy:You're not alone, but of more interest is we got no advance notice of the event. Since so many around here know so much.
Some claim there is no trust, we're penny-less!
Thanks much, cal
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:01:21 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 07:50 AM EDT Msg. 772016 of 772208 (This msg. is a reply to 771890 by my69z.) Jump to msg. # my69z put out another good mp3. big stuff is a brewin' in the FALC and with cmkx.
thanks chris.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:01:57 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 09:39 AM EDT Msg. 772018 of 772208 Jump to msg. # when CMKX trades again shorts will have 35 days to cover. many cert holders will NOT send back their certificate to be converted to electronic shares, plus, there will be new buyers of CMKX.
given that scenario i'd say shorty will have his hands full covering in those first 35 days.
and if there are a lot of buyers.... "whoa nelly!"
and there will be a ton of buyers when the word gets out about the size of the short. that's the great thing about the internet!
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 10:01 AM EDT Msg. 772019 of 772208 (This msg. is a reply to 772018 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # no wonders Y many key bashers are still here working hard... :
By: stockfred 13 Oct 2008, 10:02 AM EDT Msg. 772020 of 772209 (This msg. is a reply to 772018 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # rosen...OS is the total outstanding, = Certs AND Electronic shares.
Help me understand how CMKM Diamonds will trade again with so many purported NSS?!
Any short will have to be dealt with, before the SEC will allow a new form of CMKM to trade.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:02:20 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 10:15 AM EDT Msg. 772024 of 772210 (This msg. is a reply to 772020 by stockfred.) Jump to msg. # stockfred, you could be right. they sure wouldn't want cmkx to come back to life with a boatload of FTDs,,,, but, you never know? maybe there are some brokers that figure they'll do just fine in the marketplace and they're not worried about covering?
but if cmkx returns to trading and it announces it's share in the FALC that worth $xxxxxxxx, then, at that point, covering might be difficult and exceedingly expensive. maybe too expensive? then what happens? what does the SEC do then? in other words, your argument makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:02:47 GMT -5
By: factanonverba13 13 Oct 2008, 10:06 AM EDT Msg. 772021 of 772210 (This msg. is a reply to 772016 by rosencrantz2010.) Jump to msg. # Things may be brewin' in the Falc, but nothing is brewing with CMKX except lawsuits and a slow but certain set up for another con.
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 10:17 AM EDT Msg. 772025 of 772210 (This msg. is a reply to 772021 by factanonverba13.) Jump to msg. # fact, listen to my69z's latest mp3. there is a lot of good info in there. we're involved in the FALC somehow, someway.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:03:22 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 10:19 AM EDT Msg. 772027 of 772210 (This msg. is a reply to 772023 by factanonverba13.) Jump to msg. # fact, you might be right, but as things drag on it's looking more and more like we're involved in somethng very big in the FALC diamond field.
cmkx is connected to too many people and entities for this to be little more than a penny stock scam.
i'm increasingly thinking we are part of something very big,,, which is what many others have been claiming for years.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:03:47 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 10:45 AM EDT Msg. 772039 of 772211 Jump to msg. # Has anyone been sending any questions to CMKM's new Shareholder's Corner?
I sent this one today:
Mark,
Recently, you posted that you felt the "Brewer" and post revocation sales by Marco were just a "side show," a distraction to the CMKM story.
If it was such a side show as you feel, then why can you not tell us whether or not the shares sold by them will be considered bonafide or not? Why not just state that they will be canceled? Unfortunately, I doubt you will answer that question, but maybe you can answer this:
Timontoo, a close friend of Bill Frizzel, stated that those shares brokered by Brewer were counterfeit. Braindamage, your close associate stated exactly the same thing. Both said that those shares would get canceled.
Mr. Brewer told me that those shares were not counterfeit, but the stock powers were forged, and they will not get canceled.
Who should we believe, those close to the company (timontoo and Braindamage) or the one who financed TOGI, loaned money to Urban Casavant, Rendell Williams, the new USCN management, and most likely Frizzel's legal fund.
I believe many would appreciated a legitimate answer to this issue without hiding behind the "legal strategy" disclaimer, as you haven't any suits pertaining to the post revocation sales nor the people involved. And, according to Mr. Brewer you never will.
Thank you for your time.
By: factanonverba13 13 Oct 2008, 10:51 AM EDT Msg. 772042 of 772211 (This msg. is a reply to 772039 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # LOL!! Well, that ought to ruin the FaulkingIdiot's morning!
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:04:19 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 11:05 AM EDT Msg. 772049 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772048 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Cindy, self revoked?!!! Jeez, why do you continue to pump that nonsense? CMKM was delisted, period. They only chose not to appeal the SEC revocation. Why, because they had no defense for an appeal.
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 11:14 AM EDT Msg. 772054 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772049 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Goodolboy - Al hodges also said that CMKX is a self-revoked stock...google it yourself...
Self-revoked makes perfect sense because how a stock could go forward with form-15 while it has 622B illegal shares? RG/Mahue had the plan,,,,and they helped CMKXers to pull certs...You bought shares after revocation so you have no past experience...
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 11:20 AM EDT Msg. 772058 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772054 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Cindy, I've seen where Al said that as well. The shear stupidity of an attorney making that kind of comment in light of the facts is truly mind boggling. Suffice it to say, I wouldn't have him represent me in a real estate transaction, much less any other aspect of law.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:04:43 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 11:31 AM EDT Msg. 772061 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772058 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Goodolboy - Al knows CMKX better than many folks here know about and he had a good reason to say so...
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 11:35 AM EDT Msg. 772063 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772061 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Cindy, there is absolutely no proof to either of your claims. Yet, there is an substantial proof to the contrary.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:05:12 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 11:39 AM EDT Msg. 772065 of 772212 Jump to msg. # KW said...2 years after cmkx was revoked...
1> He was working on the CMKX Task Force, as the point for Bill Frizzell, and he gained a lot of knowledge that Urban and others thought would be useful as the company proceeded with their efforts to help its shareholders resolve the Naked Shorting issues.
2> I (KW) trust Urban 100% -> KW stated...
He’s known and worked with Urban for some time now. Urban could have quit on us long ago...taken the assets of CMKX elsewhere... declared bankruptcy, etc. Instead, he’s still very much involved, he didn’t leave, and he’s working hard every day on helping CMKX investors see a return on their investment. He emphatically stated several times... Urban is working harder for us (CMKX Shareholders) than anyone can possibly imagine.
My question (me) is: Why KW still trusted Urban after Urban fooled him with $4,000,000 loan that KW stated earlier...and KW was so upset about this stuff...
By: gusjarvis 13 Oct 2008, 12:14 PM EDT Msg. 772084 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772065 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # all said after bill and kevin knew everything, john martin told me urban may have to take the fall but he is behind us for sure and they knew exactly what he did and didn't do
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:05:43 GMT -5
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 11:51 AM EDT Msg. 772070 of 772212 Jump to msg. # Here's a tidbit for you
Of course it's just my opinion. UC needed to cover a 55 billion share short he created in his Penson(sp) account. He contacted Brewer. Between Brewer, Kinney and UC, they devised a mechanism to launder 55 billion shares through a post revocation market scheme involving Deli and to a lesser extent Ines. The creation of the post rev pump began. Acca, Jay, tigerpaw and others were solicited to aid in the pump opening up the buying and selling of the CMKM scam once again.
The success of this market was more than some could handle and greed, as usual took over. Once the 55 billion was covered, they didn't stop, and they managed to sell over 70 billion more with deli profitting over $1 million in the process, and he was just the pusher, so you can imagine the others did just as well.
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 11:55 AM EDT Msg. 772074 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772070 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Goodoldboy - I don't see Deli could sell more than 6-7B shares...your number did not add up...UC needed to cover his short was a joke...
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 11:57 AM EDT Msg. 772075 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772074 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # cindy, lol! Oh, yes he did.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:06:15 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 12:03 PM EDT Msg. 772079 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772075 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Goodolboy - his average sale price ~0.0004 and you said he sold over 70B shares meant he made over $28,000,000 bucks which you said he made $1M was not correct.
By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 12:13 PM EDT Msg. 772082 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772079 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Jeez Cindy! He was selling at .0002 and less. Plus he has billions now himself (actually his wife does now) And, don't forget, he did have to pay for those shares. But, it's like I said, it's only my opinion. He may have only sold 30, 40 or 50 billion. Let's put it this way, he had three trips to the UC well at 4 billion a pop. He went to the Kinney well at least 6 times at between 8 billion a pop. Then add in all the other shares he bought from shareholders.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:06:37 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 12:06 PM EDT Msg. 772080 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772077 by goodolboy27.) Jump to msg. # Goodolboy....Assumed UC never loaned that $$$ then why K.W said he still trusted UC 100% after that incident....K.W should be very mad about UC instead but he was not....Why? By: goodolboy27 13 Oct 2008, 12:14 PM EDT Msg. 772083 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772080 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # Cindy, I believe the law suits evidences the fact that Kevin changed his tune and became pizzed with UC.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:07:03 GMT -5
By: gusjarvis 13 Oct 2008, 12:14 PM EDT Msg. 772084 of 772214 (This msg. is a reply to 772065 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # all said after bill and kevin knew everything, john martin told me urban may have to take the fall but he is behind us for sure and they knew exactly what he did and didn't do
By: snoopstock613 13 Oct 2008, 12:17 PM EDT Msg. 772086 of 772214 (This msg. is a reply to 772084 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Urban shouldn't have to take the fall for the other crooks.
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 12:56 PM EDT Msg. 772089 of 772215 (This msg. is a reply to 772084 by gusjarvis.) Jump to msg. # Gusjarvis...They all work together...and we will see it when it ends...
By: gusjarvis 13 Oct 2008, 12:58 PM EDT Msg. 772090 of 772215 (This msg. is a reply to 772089 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # no doubt about it, one team em
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:07:35 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 01:02 PM EDT Msg. 772092 of 772217 Jump to msg. # Why it took Tyler 3 years to find out UC was a crook...This does not make any sense at all........
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:08:01 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 03:32 PM EDT Msg. 772118 of 772222 Jump to msg. # BuD Burrell is spot on !
Big changes coming to the world of Illegal shorters in the next several weeks. Those who work the message boards for those who short are in for a BIG surprise !
~from another board~
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:08:32 GMT -5
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 04:27 PM EDT Msg. 772132 of 772222 Jump to msg. # where is that summary judgement?
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 04:28 PM EDT Msg. 772133 of 772222 Jump to msg. # this weekend will make it exactly two months since urban told the judge and courts he's too busy to appear.
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 04:29 PM EDT Msg. 772134 of 772222 Jump to msg. # can you believe it? urban turns his back on the judge and the judge blinks! LOL
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 04:29 PM EDT Msg. 772135 of 772222 Jump to msg. # let's see, what else? oh, i know,,,
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 04:30 PM EDT Msg. 772137 of 772222 Jump to msg. # are they keeping that $588 in an interest bearing checking account?
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 04:31 PM EDT Msg. 772138 of 772223 Jump to msg. # they must be making interest on that money. that's the only explanation for how they've been able to pay for everything these past few years.
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 04:31 PM EDT Msg. 772140 of 772223 Jump to msg. # TYLER has good money managers. good thing TYLER kept their investments in CASH.
By: rosencrantz2010 13 Oct 2008, 04:33 PM EDT Msg. 772142 of 772223 Jump to msg. # imagine what TYLER's portfolio would look like if they had decided to invest that $588 in stock!
they took good advice, CASH IS KING.
ain't that the truth. especially nowadays.
|
|
|
Post by soonerlew on Oct 13, 2008 20:09:48 GMT -5
By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 11:39 AM EDT Msg. 772065 of 772212 Jump to msg. # KW said...2 years after cmkx was revoked... 1> He was working on the CMKX Task Force, as the point for Bill Frizzell, and he gained a lot of knowledge that Urban and others thought would be useful as the company proceeded with their efforts to help its shareholders resolve the Naked Shorting issues. 2> I (KW) trust Urban 100% -> KW stated... He’s known and worked with Urban for some time now. Urban could have quit on us long ago...taken the assets of CMKX elsewhere... declared bankruptcy, etc. Instead, he’s still very much involved, he didn’t leave, and he’s working hard every day on helping CMKX investors see a return on their investment. He emphatically stated several times... Urban is working harder for us (CMKX Shareholders) than anyone can possibly imagine. My question (me) is: Why KW still trusted Urban after Urban fooled him with $4,000,000 loan that KW stated earlier...and KW was so upset about this stuff... By: gusjarvis 13 Oct 2008, 12:14 PM EDT Msg. 772084 of 772212 (This msg. is a reply to 772065 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # all said after bill and kevin knew everything, john martin told me urban may have to take the fall but he is behind us for sure and they knew exactly what he did and didn't do By: elvis-is-here 13 Oct 2008, 04:33 PM EDT Msg. 772143 of 772229 (This msg. is a reply to 772065 by aladin99.) Jump to msg. # aladin99. good question. however, there is probably no truthful logical answer. By: elvis-is-here 13 Oct 2008, 04:43 PM EDT Msg. 772151 of 772228 (This msg. is a reply to 772143 by elvis-is-here.) Jump to msg. # aladin99, in furtherance, there is probably no truthful logical answer as to how the document was postdated by a month. Yes, it could be an accident, one of those additional strange coincidences. However, I can easily see how an attorney or other professional might have a pre dated document. A pre dated document may have been a form used earlier where the prior date was inadvertently left unchanged. In addition, a pre dated document may have not have been signed at the initially contemplated time, and then, the date, was subsequently inadvertently left unchanged. By: aladin99 13 Oct 2008, 04:57 PM EDT Msg. 772154 of 772233 (This msg. is a reply to 772151 by elvis-is-here.) Jump to msg. # Elvis - TY for your reply and I agreed that there possible no truthful logical answer
|
|