|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 10:49:59 GMT -5
by seagull: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #15 Today at 8:21am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: chuckwheat Re: latest from Paltalk « Reply #377 Yesterday at 7:51pm » --------------------------------------------------------- It's being said the Connecticut trustee was the hold-up, packets were scheduled for release. This trustee said he was above the law, and has been arrested for contempt of a court order. They have until midnight tomorrow (Dec 31) to get it done. All secondhand news from people who were in GV. C-Dub tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 11:00:20 GMT -5
Reposted by seagull Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #21 Today at 11:33am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By: ming for european shareholders...j « Thread Started Today at 9:47am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- if, and i mean "IF", it is correct that packets were sent from the USA on 04.00 pm est to Europe, (as i believe pj said), via DHL, if all these elements are indeed correct, then packets are first going to the main hub in Leipzig, from where they are sent by plane to the other European capitals and distributed in that particalar country, the next day. 04.00h pm est friday = more or less 00.00h midnight friday evening in Europe. . these packets were too late for the friday evening transport to Europe, so at the earliest they are sent on saterday night, if DHL is open on that last day of the year, which i don't know. so, IF this all is correct, then we could expect packets at the earliest on monday, tuesday, or wednesday, in Europe. don't call DHL to see if a packet is sent to your adrress. they will ask for an AWB-nr to trace the packet. which you obviously don't know. let's hope for the best! « Last Edit: Today at 9:54am by ming117 » tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=2
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 11:00:54 GMT -5
Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #22 Today at 11:49am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- wyatt11_11: A copy of the Notice of Appeal is attached for your info and will be timely filed unless packages including a first payment have been previously received. The appeal is to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and will be filed in the District Court. Please note that the Order of Dismissal was not filed until December 29; that is what starts the running of the 30 days. tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=2*************** by Tramp: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #29 Today at 12:45pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 12:00pm, dcswingtown wrote: Today at 11:49am, tramp wrote:wyatt11_11: A copy of the Notice of Appeal is attached for your info and will be timely filed unless packages including a first payment have been previously received. The appeal is to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and will be filed in the District Court. Please note that the Order of Dismissal was not filed until December 29; that is what starts the running of the 30 days. Tramp this sounds like Al sent this statement to someone. Do you know who? Reply: the plaintiffs, and wyatt gave me permssion to post this so not to have confusion...this is a backup to make sure things are sent out... tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=2
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 13:33:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 13:34:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 13:35:03 GMT -5
by pianoplayer: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #34 Today at 1:10pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TY Bikinipro Today at 11:08am, john3339 wrote: Well, since last night, the issue of whether the packets were sent out, ran the range of possibilities. Simple minds want to know....WERE they sent out or were they NOT sent out? If they were sent out yesterday afternoon/evening, depending on the delivery that was paid for, shareholders could start getting them today through Monday or Tuesday! Was it overnighted, or regular rate delivery? I don't need convoluted answers...plain and simple: Were they sent out as originally stated? Are they delayed as was implied late inthe night? Are they sent (to be sent) overnight delivery or longer? There is no wrong answer, as long as it's true. For me, it's not a matter of IF, but of WHEN money is received. Keep your hopes in check until you receive yours...then hope for wisdom to spend it wisely! john chucky John, Good points. I do not have the information on "how" they were sent out, just that they were. I would say that if not received today I might stay home "sick" on Monday.. Cough, cough......... There are very valid reasons Al might not be aware if packets were sent out but I'm not going there yet. Let's just let this play out til Monday imo. I'm headed out for the day - but will get a call from someone if they receive their packet. All the best, Chucky millionaires.proboards.com/index.....&page=28#510559 tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=2
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 13:36:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 13:37:03 GMT -5
by pianoplayer: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #37 Today at 1:30pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TY Ming for American shareholders : Re: Packet delivery updates « Reply #95 Today at 10:26am » Just talked to my fedex guy... (he came to deliver something else... I nearly had a heart attack). He said he will check into it for me.. says mass type mailings like this are always overnighted. Said if packets were picked up/dropped off late yesterday evening.. cutoff would have been missed for most so they would all go for overnight tonight and of course they are closed tomorrow so would be monday. Says with mass mailings that need to be timed it can be done that way. He has my cell number and will call me asap if he sees or hears anything. And yes, I do trust this guy.. I know him and trust him. Just thought I'd pass on. Pixie cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/inde....ead=7880&page=7 tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=2
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 13:38:03 GMT -5
by pianoplayer: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #38 Today at 1:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TY Chucky My last post before I head out. « Thread Started Today at 12:23pm » Food for thought: Our money is secured and has been for a long time. Cottrell's Trust was not and still needed to be funded last we were told by Al. As I previously stated, there is a SC Directive that states the CMKX shareholders will be paid by end of 2010, not imo. Apparently we are at the crossroads of "SC paid by year end directive" and "waiting on Cottrell's Trust to be funded to obtain ER", which do you think overrules? Lastly, if DHL is indeed the carrier as has been rumored (and I state without hesitation as I have posted the same from their Website - that they do indeed deliver stateside still; flat mail, catalog service, and more.....) that they have a 4 day window. As always, if I hear of any changes I will keep you informed. Have a great weekend. Chucky tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=2
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 13:38:35 GMT -5
by bymorstock: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #39 Today at 1:41pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 1:31pm, pianoplayer wrote:TY Chucky My last post before I head out. « Thread Started Today at 12:23pm » Food for thought: Our money is secured and has been for a long time. Cottrell's Trust was not and still needed to be funded last we were told by Al. As I previously stated, there is a SC Directive that states the CMKX shareholders will be paid by end of 2010, not imo. Apparently we are at the crossroads of "SC paid by year end directive" and "waiting on Cottrell's Trust to be funded to obtain ER", which do you think overrules? Lastly, if DHL is indeed the carrier as has been rumored (and I state without hesitation as I have posted the same from their Website - that they do indeed deliver stateside still; flat mail, catalog service, and more.....) that they have a 4 day window. As always, if I hear of any changes I will keep you informed. Have a great weekend. Chucky "As I previously stated, there is a SC Directive that states the CMKX shareholders will be paid by end of 2010, not imo." To me that means I have $$$ in hand by 12/31/10 at 11:59 pm .... Anything after that means someone is in contempt of court IMO ... "As I previously stated, there is a SC Directive that states the CMKX shareholders will be paid by end of 2010, not imo." This does not mean to me that money is in transit. tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=2
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 13:42:51 GMT -5
by ChuckWheat: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #40 Today at 1:57pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 1:41pm, bymorstock wrote: "As I previously stated, there is a SC Directive that states the CMKX shareholders will be paid by end of 2010, not imo." To me that means I have $$$ in hand by 12/31/10 at 11:59 pm .... Anything after that means someone is in contempt of court IMO ... "As I previously stated, there is a SC Directive that states the CMKX shareholders will be paid by end of 2010, not imo." This does not mean to me that money is in transit. Reply: Think about your annual tax return. If you owe money to the IRS, do they consider it paid on time only if funds arrive BY April 15...or if your envelope is POSTMARKED by April 15? Food for thought, C-Dub tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=3******************* by seagull: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #41 Today at 2:30pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- thanks bikinipro By: chucky My last post before I head out. « Thread Started Today at 12:23pm » Food for thought: Our money is secured and has been for a long time. Cottrell's Trust was not and still needed to be funded last we were told by Al. As I previously stated, there is a SC Directive that states the CMKX shareholders will be paid by end of 2010, not imo. Apparently we are at the crossroads of "SC paid by year end directive" and "waiting on Cottrell's Trust to be funded to obtain ER", which do you think overrules? Lastly, if DHL is indeed the carrier as has been rumored (and I state without hesitation as I have posted the same from their Website - that they do indeed deliver stateside still; flat mail, catalog service, and more.....) that they have a 4 day window. As always, if I hear of any changes I will keep you informed. Have a great weekend. Chucky By: debintex I think I finally got the answer I've been looking for... if I read Chucky's post correctly, the SC directive did not address WGS, but it did directly address CMKX shareholders. That is huge to me and exactly what I was hoping for. How do others read his statement? Deb' tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=3****************** by seagull: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #42 Today at 2:33pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 1:57pm, ChuckWheat wrote: Today at 1:41pm, bymorstock wrote: "As I previously stated, there is a SC Directive that states the CMKX shareholders will be paid by end of 2010, not imo." To me that means I have $$$ in hand by 12/31/10 at 11:59 pm .... Anything after that means someone is in contempt of court IMO ... "As I previously stated, there is a SC Directive that states the CMKX shareholders will be paid by end of 2010, not imo." This does not mean to me that money is in transit. Think about your annual tax return. If you owe money to the IRS, do they consider it paid on time only if funds arrive BY April 15...or if your envelope is POSTMARKED by April 15? Food for thought, C-Dub I think it has to be postmarked ...by midnight April 15... and I think post offices stay open late on Apr. 15 for that reason. tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=3******************* by ChuckWheat: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #43 Today at 2:37pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 2:33pm, seagull wrote: I think it has to be postmarked ...by midnight April 15... and I think post offices stay open late on Apr. 15 for that reason. Reply: Correct. I believe to be compliant with the SC directive packets need only be postmarked before the end of the day today. C-Dub tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=3
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 16:29:01 GMT -5
by seagull: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #45 Today at 2:53pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- thanks bikinipro By: pennyslave Why would who ever send out packets BEFORE AL says we have ER . AL said he would let us know when we have ER? By: chucky We do not NECESSARILY need ER to get our packets since we have the SC Directive on our side. Kabish? tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=3
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 16:34:15 GMT -5
by seagull: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #46 Today at 3:01pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Great idea Chucky!! By: Chucky John, Good points. I do not have the information on "how" they were sent out, just that they were. I would say that if not received today I might stay home "sick" on Monday.. Cough, cough......... There are very valid reasons Al might not be aware if packets were sent out but I'm not going there yet. Let's just let this play out til Monday imo. I'm headed out for the day - but will get a call from someone if they receive their packet. All the best, Chucky tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=3
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Dec 31, 2010 17:12:52 GMT -5
by Tramp: Re: gossip December 31, 2010!!! « Reply #53 Today at 5:01pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 1:26pm, pianoplayer wrote:TY Bikinipro seeking Grand Prune First Payment We Will Receive!!!!! « Thread Started Today at 11:10pm » First payment is F&P, ER is not needed to receive this payment. Al will still be making the ER announcement once it's received!!! cmkxhottub.proboards.com/index.cg....6#ixzz19exapzKlToday at 12:05pm, pennyslave wrote: Why would who ever send out packets BEFORE AL says we have ER . AL said he would let us know when we have ER? chucky We do not NECESSARILY need ER to get our packets since we have the SC Directive on our side. Kabish? millionaires.proboards.com/index.....&page=28#510618seeking 100% Agree!!! Trust hasn't been released, Bring it AL!!!! Read more: cmkxhottub.proboards.com/index.cg....1#ixzz19hyP0obD Reply: In BOLD is what i understand is 100% CORRECT.... amd look for US govt mail....not a fed -ex truck.. good ol mail....read POOF for more info on the F&P...fines and penalties... they are getting a debit card and must leave their money in that bank to help the banks.... until someone gets something, we won't know how it comes, or its a check or a debit card, but theirs is in the millions... and we are parrellon alot of stuff.... {First payment is F&P, ER is not needed to receive this payment. Al will still be making the ER announcement once it's received!!! tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=15453&page=3
|
|
|
Post by misisipiflyer on Jan 1, 2011 8:56:38 GMT -5
we need to distinguish what the Supreme Court Directive entails. Firstly, Supreme Court Directive is SOLELY the release of funds for the CMKX Shareholders and not thereof of the World Global Settlement Funds by years end of 2010. Mr. Hodges was brilliant in this, in this way at the end of the year of 2010 our trust fund(s) break us away from the World Global Settlements timing release and we will be paid, otherwise the Supreme Court Directive is in contempt.
Delay of the World Global Settlement Funds are based on National Security when those in charge XXX know and have given the green light then funds are released world wide. As of December 31 2010 11:59 pm our packets and rest of our funds in process, should have been released according to the Directive the Supreme Court issued to Mr. Hodges, which breaks us away from the WGS Funds as I have mentioned.
Other aspects with delay of WGS Funds are in play in the background which cannot be disclosed yet I assure you there is far more that meets the average joe public's eye and understanding.
Yes the Directive exists from the Supreme Court that we are to be paid by years end 2010. Just because we receive packets in 2011 doesnt mean the directive was not adhered to. Look at the time stamp when packets are delivered when they were released they are still dated for last date of 2010 which will show the Supreme Court Directive was adhered to.
Harv
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Jan 1, 2011 13:19:53 GMT -5
By: leowanta 31 Dec 2010, 04:53 PM EST Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 983267 of 983457 (Reply to 983256 by l_broke_o) Jump to msg. # i_broke_o...is there a court order that says CMKX shareholders are to be paid? no the SEC has not entered that request yet...does it have to be/should it be public knowledge? ? good question. ..if i was the SEC knowing 632 Trillion counterfeit derivatives are 'out there' most of that number is naked shorting of investors....would any official in their right mind, publically state cmkx shareholders are to be paid? NO. The world knows CMKX was heavily naked shorted...no amount of court records can begin to cover up that common knowledge. Therefore, i believe it will not be public, there may be a court order, with language that does not speak to CMKX payment. Why i believe this???...since the SEC sent their proxy to attend December 6, hearing, with the MESSAGE to Al Hodges that the TRUST is a PRIVATE TRUST....not controlled by the U.S.Government....i'd have to say the Government will not entertain any order for payment. Al Hodges is completely out of this ballgame...he has struck out. He has no legal appeal, because on every count of the dismissal, the judge was standing on sound law.. .if Al Hodges files an appeal...I WILL PERSONALLY SUE HIM AND ALL 7 PLAINTIFFS FOR BIG $$$$$$$ DAMAGES>>>GROUNDS: FALSE CLAIMS ACT; INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, INTENTIONAL DELAY OF MONITARY RESTITUTION FILING FRIVOLOUS LAWSUITS. For some reason all of pb29 members are still supporting Al Hodges PUMPERS...and are on his bandwagon believing that our Private Trust is somehow connect to/in World Settlements....someone has told someone that CMKX payout is in the prosperity packages which conflicts with what the Government told Al Hodges December 6th. So, then we have FACTS FROM FIRST HAND SOURCE>>> Bobhwang has "sight" he told us on the 18th of December he was paid $.05 on the 21st of December. So, i'd have to go with Bobhwang (Bobhwang doesn't lie...he tells it like he sees it!). ..SOOOOO, we were paid, $.05, the question is, what else did they need in the letter to mail it out....or>>>>>>>>>>since Bobhwang has future sight...maybe he saw what is happening right now, the pump for Al Hodges world settlement stuff...and Bobhwang told urban to hold off mailing it until this current Al Hodges lie comes to the surface as a LIE; before mailing out our $.05 Understand Brokie: You cannot outsmart seers, they see the future and fortunately for cmkx bona fide longs, with their help; we can side-step fraud upon us coming out the gate, thanks to those who have SIGHT! So, yes, i think we are about to get paid, it should be the initial $.05/share (probably a simple one page letter, telling us to take our certificates to a designated bank, with proof of purchase of the shares shown on the certificate and we get paid. Probably, at that time; we will give the entity our electronic transfer account infomation, for future payment(s)). Why burden carriers with the safety of checks, debit cards bringing money to 39,000 shareholders??? Smart way is to simply send a letter, that costs $.42, regular mail... Therefore, i have a feeling the LETTER will arrive when this current lie-dance has run its course...and all is silent. NOW, NOBODY REPEAT THE ABOVE POST AS FACT....REMEMBER BROKIE...YOU ASKED ME FOR MY THOUGHTS.....THIS POST IS MY ASSUMPTION, KNOWING THAT NOBODY KNOWS THE MOMENT WE WILL BE PAID..AND FOR A VERY GOOD REASON>>>>SECURITY. THANK YOU FATHER leowanta - - - - - View Replies » ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CMKI&read=983267
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Jan 1, 2011 19:35:38 GMT -5
(6:04 PM) jacbert: PJ's contact #2 is in the GV and said expect a knock on the door within the next 2-3 hours. The Japanese and chinese have taken over the delivery of the packages----fwitw
|
|
|
Post by misisipiflyer on Jan 2, 2011 15:28:31 GMT -5
An open letter to Peter Maheu... « Thread Started Yesterday at 8:34pm » lt.kk
Dear IBM, Peter and family: We know you have been with us through these past years. It would be impossible to be a shareholder and not feel your presence. As we come to a signpost in this long journey we are prepared to make you a solemn promise that if we are to be the next wealthy people on this planet, that we will be sure to remember always the principles that led you to formulate this genius plan and for making us your companions on this journey to save our country and the world. We are ready to move forward and show you and our maker that there is a better way for us all to live. There is a more giving and caring way to spend our time on this Earth. We know that that is what your plan is all about and we readily accept the challenge. We know that the seed of this plan was born in goodness and caring and we will not let you down. There are some of us that do not believe that we have finally reached our destination. I understand their disbelief! After all IBM you are the master of deception and Peter, the Apple does not fall far from the tree. Please, we ask if we are not at the point where we are to take the reigns we would hope that you would find a way to let us know that we have to push on a bit farther. We are very strong and resilient from the journey and if there is more to accomplish, we are ready. Most of us know this is not about money. It is about getting back to God's plan.
Thank you and we respectfully send our gratitude to you and your family. It was hard for us, but it was much more to you and yours. We send our love and respect to you Peter and to IBM as he sits at the right hand of the lord. We are ready...CMKX shareholders. Lt.KK
bikinipro "Please, we ask if we are not at the point where we are to take the reigns we would hope that you would find a way to let us know that we have to push on a bit farther."
So Kenny, this being said, do you think that the payment for F&P went out like Chicky and PJ confirmed....and that we're still waiting for the trust to be released and announcement of ER?
lt.kk I concur with Chucky!
|
|
|
Post by misisipiflyer on Jan 2, 2011 15:29:39 GMT -5
Granny talks to Bonney Saturday night « Thread Started Today at 2:34pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mark Mc****: Hi Carlain. What do you make of the latest packages sent rumors? 2 hours ago · LikeUnlike
Carlain *****: Mark, I talked to Mr. Bonney last night and he said some have already been sent to a "safe keeping " center and when they are all done then what ever co. is going to deliver them, then they will be picked up and delivered and he said 80 cents per share. And that the money will be backed by the US Treasury. Now is his info correct I sure hope so. I guess I will talk to him again tonight.
|
|
|
Post by misisipiflyer on Jan 2, 2011 15:30:13 GMT -5
Posted by tchrguy
The contact who spoke in PT was contact number 1 from PJ. He spoke mainly about the global settlement issue. When asked about CMKX, he stated he had little knowledge about our stock. He did say that he has heard our packets were out but could not substantiate that. He also said we are in a great position.
Trixi
|
|
|
Post by misisipiflyer on Jan 2, 2011 15:31:51 GMT -5
From BHollenegg today:
From all the information available to me, I feel very confident that the first payment packages are en route, if not, will be shortly. The amounts are huge, well deserved, and life changing.
|
|
|
Post by misisipiflyer on Jan 2, 2011 20:15:47 GMT -5
For all Bonafide CMKX Shareholders to read Important
As we wait for what this week brings us. I wish to offer the best advice for all of us.
When your doorbell rings and you accept what has been coming to you and should of been several years ago. Do the most important thing you can will do not just for yourself, also for the rest of the Bonafide Shareholders of CMKX.
Keep your new parcel information details off the boards and to yourself. Most important task you will have EVER. Please do not go and run to your computer and disclose you received something we have been waiting for. What you receive is sacred and the details need to be kept off the boards and away from others. I am asking you think about all the thousands of hours that went into what you are going to receive and what it took to get it to you.
We need to have a completely different mindset from, exposing detail to keeping the details to yourself for your own good and others. I mean that sincerely. Old saying loose lips sink ships, disclose details may very well sink your ship when you receive what is due us and not only for yourselves, for the rest of the shareholder base.
When you receive what has been due us, quietly rejoice, keep it to yourself. It really is utmost importance for all of us. Many here on this board are not shareholders of CMKX. More we keep those that are not shareholders in the dark and refrain from disclosing details, your safety and protection from threats/harassment increase.
I wish you all the best
Harv
|
|
|
Post by misisipiflyer on Jan 2, 2011 20:17:29 GMT -5
tramp
remember, they are in staging areas nearby of where you live to be delivered to you in less than 1 day... they are waiting to be told to be delivered...
lt.kk
I believe from all I have heard ( And that is a great deal of info) that as Tramp indicates, a timed release is in progress to uphold the SC directive while conforming to financial changes such as the Treasury notes and currency revalue are taking place. As I see it any action by Mr. Hodges at this point is as Bob says, is precautionary so that all runs smoothly. I know it is hard to wait but we can't lose here folks and it will not go backwards at this point. Lt.KK
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Jan 3, 2011 0:35:36 GMT -5
January 2, 2010 Re: IMO: For all Bonafide CMKX Shareholders. Impor « Result #7 Yesterday at 7:28pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 7:20pm, *GLITTERGIRL* wrote:Harv - Are you saying that we shouldn't even say that we got the packet?? I can see keeping the details private but letting others know that it finally arrived couldn't be harmful, do you think? Thanks! Glittergirl Reply: Say nothing ZERO to anyone. Its the beginning of a new life. When it arrives scream shout whatever, just keep it to yourself. It is so important, it REALLY is. I cannot be more clearer than what I have already written. Share nothing with no one. Harv *********************** Re: IMO: For all Bonafide CMKX Shareholders. Impor « Result #6 Yesterday at 7:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 7:27pm, Shrek wrote:At least we should tell we received the packet. Also, if the rumor said amount is true, just say the rumor is true too - by then we will know who have the credible sources and who we should listen to. I think that is fair enough for all bonafide shareholders. Reply: We tell NO ONE. Let the rumor keep the non shareholders guessing. We will be living a new life while those non shareholders will still be here arguing and pretending still to be shareholders. Say nothing whether the rumor is true. Keep everything to yourself when it arrives. Harv ********************** Re: IMO: For all Bonafide CMKX Shareholders. Impor « Result #5 Yesterday at 7:35pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 7:18pm, redcat3 wrote:Just say you have received your packet and nothing more, just so the rest of know. Reply: Rest of the shareholders will know when doorbell rings, we do not need more messengers causing issues. Keep it to yourself is utmost importance. Harv ******************** Re: IMO: For all Bonafide CMKX Shareholders. Impor « Result #4 Yesterday at 9:52pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 8:47pm, xxdiamondchildxx wrote:Harv, EXCELLENT Post!...especially at this point in time. ALL CMKX Shareholders should heed to Your advice and overall "Words Of Wisdom" IMO. Happy New Year!...and God Bless ALWAYS! Your Excellent Friend & CMKX Brother, Peter (Dxild) Reply: Peter thank you for your kind words. your friend Harv ****************** Re: IMO: For all Bonafide CMKX Shareholders. Impor « Result #3 Yesterday at 9:57pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 9:12pm, mchlgarrison wrote:Excellent post Harv, It is no ones business what my finances are. My lips are sealed. Unfortionately, the only way to keep everyone quiet is to close all the boards. this would not bother me a bit. I plan to close all my accounts on the boards anyway. Thanks for the advice and good luck to all of us. mchlgarrison Reply: I would agree with closing down the boards, it may very well happen should those in charge deem it fit for safety for the shareholders, IMO. thank you for your compliment Harv ********************** Re: IMO: For all Bonafide CMKX Shareholders. Impor « Result #2 Yesterday at 10:27pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 10:03pm, longlurker wrote: Quote:I would agree with closing down the boards, it may very well happen should those in charge deem it fit for safety for the shareholders, IMO. thank you for your compliment Harv No....No....NO....we need this board. When people like you start pushing your agenda, it makes it easy to see! We have no packets yet....and you're already talking about closing the boards. You're getting "funny" again Harv. Reply: You are absolutely right. Non shareholders need this board. What is my agenda exactly? I was giving my opinion not pushing a agenda which I have none. Safety of the shareholders is paramount. Harv ********************** Re: Door chime/Door bell « Result #1 Yesterday at 10:46pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yesterday at 10:43pm, beckins wrote:New Years Eve the darned thing wouldnt stop ringing, first the Fed Ex guy with vacuum bags we ordered, then UPS with shoe deodorant we ordered for my son in Afghanistan, and then the USPS with slacks my wife ordered.....my nerves were shot..... Reply: here I thought thats why your wife ordered new slacks because they were shot? millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=harvscorvette
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Jan 3, 2011 11:31:28 GMT -5
kenshin7 yes briwadd i am telling the truth and it went like this i was talking to mr bonney and he was kind enough to call al in a conference call . if you like please call mr bonney and i am sure he will verify this . we also talked about a lot of our past military history, as we had both been to some of the same locations world wide . and i did not say the packets are in the mail al and mr bonney told me 80 cents a share and the packets would be going out , there is more,, but things seemed to get out of place after so many people spread it around as each person has his or her own sense of perception . sorry i do not post much anymore but have been in this stock since 03 when we had the original board and melvin did sunday chats and radio shows . i do hope this comes to pass for all our sakes as so many people need this.
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Jan 3, 2011 20:45:51 GMT -5
Most of Chucky's posts today, January 3, 2010 The update I promised. « Thread Started Today at 8:31pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, as I promised I would try to get more info to share , with those who are willing to lend an ear anyway. For those who do not, please do not corrupt this thread with what I am about to say, there's the jfarn thread for that. lol. First some clarity from jfarn's very detailed and informative post. Jfarn is correct. My source does in fact speak with Cottrell, as he does many people to find out what he needs to find out in regards to our situation. Cottrell is just one of a myriad of people my source speaks with, but not a source that we have gleaned anything "earth-shattering" from - but a source nonetheless. I don't know why jfarn singled out Cottrell as "the source" my person speaks with, I suspect he's trying to add some validity to his perspective while trying to discredit me and my source - but I digress..... I have received info from my source today, and it's not the type of info I was hoping to share with all of you, but I did promise to bring any new info to you, good or bad. The info I have is both good and bad, as was explained to me. Bad in that the release of the packets did not occur as stipulated/ordered in the SC Directive. Good in that it is being taken care of as we speak. I cannot and will not release the details of this information other than to say that I was rather surprised when I heard it myself - not because it is that unbelievable or the stuff from the book of Nesara (really it's not.. lol) - rather because it helped to put in place a lot of the pieces of the puzzle that I had a difficult time finding places for in the past and also put in perspective just how close we are to seeing the end to our plight. Because of the sensitive nature of what I have learned, I will not expound on it further, only to say (and jfarn, you will love this.... lol.) just give it another week. I will leave here for now and be keeping active in the background. No silly bashers, not hiding from anyone - just that there's nothing more I will add for now and probably won't have to before we are paid anyway. "I'll be back" Chucky millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36401*************** Re: The update I promised. « Result #12 Today at 9:22pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 9:13pm, vinman28 wrote:Chucky thanks for your time...just a couple of questions please...How does your source go from packets have been sent out to it did not happen? Bob says you have the best connections. Why would this info be put out there and then never happen? I am really lost for words here. I know its not your fault and please dont take this message wrong. For most of us here you are our only sign of hope...Please continue to communicate with us. Thanks My source did not think the SC Directive would be ignored (there is very good reason to support why he felt that way - it may become publicly available later, but not for me to publicize now). In any event, it was ignored and was being dealt with earlier today. Some people said there is no SC Directive or the US Supreme Court has no teeth? We shall see. ******************** Re: The update I promised. « Result #9 Today at 9:37pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FWIF - My info has absolutely nothing to do with Tramp's or PJ's latest info. ******************** Re: The update I promised. « Result #8 Today at 9:41pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 9:40pm, groundfog wrote:Chucky, When do you expect another update from your source? Thanks Reply: When he reaches out to me. Probably in just a day or two. **************** Re: The update I promised. « Result #7 Today at 9:44pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 9:41pm, cheerioman25 wrote:Thanks Chucky, I forgot that we are in the same spot we were in 2 years ago. reply: Far from it. Very far from it. Did you know about the trust 2 years ago? Did we have a SC Directive ordering for us to be paid 2 years ago? Oh, nevermind....... You're posting in the wrong thread. *************** Re: The update I promised. « Result #4 Today at 10:19pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 10:10pm, ziggy wrote: Today at 9:59pm, chucky wrote: Either you believe me or you don't. Your choice. What part should we believe? Reply: The SC directive for one. But that's up to you. You can believe jfarn in that we have nothing and all this over the past 6/7 years has been just a farce, or you can believe there's more to this than meets the eye. Your choice. ****************** Re: I'm a little lost!! Please help!! « Result #3 Today at 10:28pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 10:22pm, longhorn wrote:The info on the trust is what's in the packet that we're alledgedly about to receive which includes the F&P payment that was supposed to be by Christmas, then by first of year, then today, and now the chinese are in control of it, which begs the question, have you seen any DHL, FedEx, UPS rickshaw drivers in your neighborhood lately? Longhorn reply: Confucius say, "Don't get confused. Chinese have nothing to do with our packets." **************** Re: A Million Dollars « Result #2 Today at 10:54pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 10:51pm, sooner wrote:chucky The update I promised. « Thread Started Today at 5:31pm » Well, as I promised I would try to get more info to share , with those who are willing to lend an ear anyway. For those who do not, please do not corrupt this thread with what I am about to say, there's the jfarn thread for that. lol. First some clarity from jfarn's very detailed and informative post. Jfarn is correct. My source does in fact speak with Cottrell, as he does many people to find out what he needs to find out in regards to our situation. Cottrell is just one of a myriad of people my source speaks with, but not a source that we have gleaned anything "earth-shattering" from - but a source nonetheless. I don't know why jfarn singled out Cottrell as "the source" my person speaks with, I suspect he's trying to add some validity to his perspective while trying to discredit me and my source - but I digress..... I have received info from my source today, and it's not the type of info I was hoping to share with all of you, but I did promise to bring any new info to you, good or bad. The info I have is both good and bad, as was explained to me. Bad in that the release of the packets did not occur as stipulated/ordered in the SC Directive. Good in that it is being taken care of as we speak. I cannot and will not release the details of this information other than to say that I was rather surprised when I heard it myself - not because it is that unbelievable or the stuff from the book of Nesara (really it's not.. lol) - rather because it helped to put in place a lot of the pieces of the puzzle that I had a difficult time finding places for in the past and also put in perspective just how close we are to seeing the end to our plight. Because of the sensitive nature of what I have learned, I will not expound on it further, only to say (and jfarn, you will love this.... lol.) just give it another week. I will leave here for now and be keeping active in the background. No silly bashers, not hiding from anyone - just that there's nothing more I will add for now and probably won't have to before we are paid anyway. "I'll be back" Chucky I could have bet a million bucks this was coming. Just how close we are to seeing the end of our plight. I will bet a million of my shares Chucky is Jay Adobe. Who will be the next to tell us how wealthy we will be in this year of 2011. I feel so sorry for the shareholders who has been tortured from these Idiot Gurus who have promised unbelievable wealth. If we lived in China they would be taken to the street for all to see...well i cant get to carried away here but you know what i mean! There that old saying ..what goes around comes around. You ones in need i hope something good comes your way, I've read the boards and know how some are in distress. Al its time for you to speak to the shareholders good or bad..they don't deserve this bull sh-t anymore....Sorry but this has gone to far...Peace and good luck! (OF COURSE ON THE MILLIONAIRES BOARD, CHUCK IS ROFLHAO) ******************** Re: A Million Dollars « Result #1 Today at 11:08pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 11:06pm, sooner wrote:Sure he is, his writing is just like Adobe. Now why has Jay just disappeared at this wealthy times we seek? Heck, can I take the bet? 50 million shares? Reply: Have a tall glass of iced tea and be kind to your fellow shareholder.... millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=chucky
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Jan 3, 2011 23:49:25 GMT -5
Subj: Gus & Al Say... (1:59 PM) got_cmkx_1: Al Hodges email to gusjarvis today: the paraphrased reply was, "all current information suggests that packages will go out and no appeal is necessary." No real details, just positive!
I EMAILED AL TO CLEAR UP THE CONFUSION « Thread Started Today at 1:18pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- At this moment Al knows whether the packages went out or not, whether the supreme court directive worked or whether our opposition doesn't care about the most powerful court in the land, which makes an appeal useless.
We are at the end of the game, it is over, good or bad, no extentions needed. To have those in charge know whether our fate was amazing or completely shattering and sit quiet is sad. To have those running this that actually started many of the rumors we were not suppose to listen to to now be quiet is sad. To have those that started the rumors say don't listen to the rumors is sad. For those starting them to say you get what you deserve when you listen to rumors is a joke.
It is time to ball up and give us the truth, good, bad, or ugly.
To Al:
I hope all is well and things are working out.
I see that all shareholders have been told there was a supreme court directive that said this had to be done by midnight on dec 31, that date has passed and obviously you and others know if things worked out or not. The word has been sent out that the packages are on en route and that there is eighty cents in the first package, but here we sit in the dark still having to rely on rumors still.
Given you are now fully aware of whether this worked out or not and whether the supreme court directive worked or didn't, can you please give me something to say to all those dying out there. If you know it didn't work out we should be told, if things are right on track we should be told, to leave this to innuendo and rumors still is sad and not right at this stage in the game. I don't need to know the exact date the packages arrive, just that they will go out for sure now and there will be no appeal needed as things have worked out for us, the boards need something from you to reassure them, not second hand info.
Thanks for anything you can say to all involved, dave
(1:59 PM) got_cmkx_1: Al Hodges email to gusjarvis today: the paraphrased reply was, "all current information suggests that packages will go out and no appeal is necessary." No real details, just positive.
ty George
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Jan 4, 2011 7:49:34 GMT -5
Posts by Harvscorvette January 4, 2010 Re: For What It's Worth! NESARA NEWS « Result #3 Today at 6:12am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 5:58am, millie wrote:Found this - Don't know what to believe anymore! nesaranews.blogspot.com/ Millie Where is your focus directed at? Many many shareholders beliefs are being tested I understand the anxiety many have. All these side shows of so called rumor information will make it worse if we keeping turning away from the direction Mr. Hodges has us directed towards. When we are easily swayed then confusion will creep in. Reread as much as possible from Robert's postings and Mr. Hodges it will certainly help keep the focus. Harv millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=harvscorvette********************** Re: For What It's Worth! NESARA NEWS « Result #1 Today at 6:35am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 6:29am, millie wrote: Harv and Dutch79: I just brought it over for people to read and make up their own minds. Much of what this report has to say, parallels some of the other rumors we have been reading over the last few days on this board. As for my focus, I'm just not sure anymore! Millie Millie the feeling is like drowning and many dont think they can keep up anymore. You have been here this long keep focusing on what Robert and Mr. Hodges have said and done, I know you have it in you to keep the faith. Focus on how far we have come, we are at the apex. Harv millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=harvscorvette
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Jan 4, 2011 7:54:01 GMT -5
January 4, 2010 From Chuck... Re: The update I promised. « Reply #128 Today at 7:36am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 6:24am, pelanas wrote:So, dear chucky, if you have not followed the directive of the Court, then as you said, there is neither law nor justice. It's a shame. Reply: It's only a shame until they drop the hammer. ******************** Re: The update I promised. « Reply #129 Today at 7:37am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Today at 6:52am, RentWizard wrote: Yesterday at 11:40pm, bobneuhart wrote: but one packet was released.... How do we know 1 was released? Reply: Bob is messing with you. Trust me. millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=36401&page=7#513348
|
|
|
Post by sandi66 on Jan 4, 2011 14:58:32 GMT -5
seagull Administrator CMKX Gossip Column member is offline courage Joined: Aug 2006 Gender: Female Posts: 24,232 Re: gossip 1/4/11 « Reply #9 Today at 1:45am » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- thanks pennypauly By: chip Re: The Buzz Chat 01/03 « Reply #192 Today at 8:48pm » Has Transfer Online always said this when checking your account? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tax Lot Shares Original Acquistion Date Total Cost Basis Additional Information Certificate is Uncovered Uncovered refers to any stock issued prior to January 1, 2011, stock held in private non trading companies or issued to none US holders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Never noticed before - Thanks! Here is what I found on a web page and could correlate to the delay we have been through as well.. who knows but it is interesting - IMO.. In October 2008, George W. Bush signed into law the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act. As part of that Act, the IRS included a proviso that all equity securities and units of investment trusts bought after January 1, 2011 will be required to maintain, pass-through and report all cost bases on all transactions. For years, the brokerage industry has maintained this information on a voluntary basis and the mutual fund industry has both maintained and, in the case of sales, reported this information on 1099B forms. It was up to the investor, however, to report the correct cost basis for individual sales of equity securities to Do you know how to allot cost basis on every transaction? Now, the issuer (YOU!) and the transfer agent (US!) will be required to maintain all tax lot cost basis information for any transfers of shares that occur after January 1, 2011. The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation is designing new software to accommodate all pass-through information through their CBRS program. This may or may not be a program in which issuers will be allowed access. As your transfer Our software has been updated and designed to handle the new law. We will require more information from you, however. www.firstamericanstock.com/cost-basis-support.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- www.firstamericanstock.com/cost-basis-support.html Cost Basis Support Very Important New Law for All Issuers, Transfer Agents, and Brokerage Firms Effective January 1, 2011 ********** As an Issuer, you are just as responsible for this information as we are. IRS could fine all entities who do not provide this information at $50.00 per missed statement, and 10% of the total cost basis amount for intentional disregard of the new law. This can, potentially, be in the millions of dollars. Call us if you have any questions! ********** In October 2008, George W. Bush signed into law the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act. As part of that Act, the IRS included a proviso that all equity securities and units of investment trusts bought after January 1, 2011 will be required to maintain, pass-through and report all cost bases on all transactions. For years, the brokerage industry has maintained this information on a voluntary basis and the mutual fund industry has both maintained and, in the case of sales, reported this information on 1099B forms. It was up to the investor, however, to report the correct cost basis for individual sales of equity securities to Do you know how to allot cost basis on every transaction? Now, the issuer (YOU!) and the transfer agent (US!) will be required to maintain all tax lot cost basis information for any transfers of shares that occur after January 1, 2011. The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation is designing new software to accommodate all pass-through information through their CBRS program. This may or may not be a program in which issuers will be allowed access. As your transfer Our software has been updated and designed to handle the new law. We will require more information from you, however. For any new issuances completed after January 1st, we will require the following additional information: cost basis per lot, and the date the money changed hands or services were rendered. If the shares are for services rendered, you will have to place a value on those services at the point when the shares are issued. We will maintain this per lot cost basis in the shareholder’s account See new Transfer Request Form and (proposed) Issuance Resolution required for use on or after January 2011. When a transfer occurs, we must pass the information through to an applicable person, via a transfer statement. The transfer statement must be sent within 15 days. The recipient is not allowed to pay for this information unless they are also the presenter of the transfer request. In most instances it may be you, the issuer, who will be billed for the additional work that we are tasked with performing. Statements are required to sent within 15 days and Issuers may have to pay for them. If we receive an applicable transfer request and the cost basis is not included, we are required to make one request for the information. If it still is not provided, we code the transaction as “uncovered”. The IRS will be tracking both covered and uncovered transactions. If the tax lot cost basis is incorrect we also must send a corrected statement within 15 days of the discovery of the error. The shareholder has the right to choose which tax lot’s cost basis to use, especially in the case of book entry shares, but if the holder does not specify, the FIFO (first in, first out) method will be used. If the shareholder opts to choose a different tax lot, we must be notified by settlement date – which, in the case of private transfers, is the date the transfer is made on the books of the issuer. If a certificate is presented, it, alone, is evidence of the correct tax lot to use for the report. FIFO allocation will be used unless otherwise notified. Two situations, in particular, bear additional attention: the gifting of shares and inheritance. If a tax lot is not specified and no cost basis is presented, we must assume that the shares are gifted. In a case such as this, the tax lot of the donor is used in combination with the fair market value on the day the shares are transferred. This, then, becomes the cost basis that we will maintain and pass-through to a recipient. Gifting will require report of fair market value on day of gift and donor’s cost basis. In the case of inheritance shares that are transferred, the estate representative must inform the agent of the cost basis, per lot, of presented shares. The representative must also notify the agent of the proportional share per recipient. If the proportional share per recipient and cost basis allocation is not provided, the agent will use the FIFO method and allocate an equal proportion per lot to each recipient. Remember, that the agent must send one request, first, if the information is not provided with the transfer request. If the information is not received within 15 days, the transaction will be coded as “uncovered”. However, 15 days is too late to wait and be provided the information before completing the transfer. Therefore, we will send the request, continue to perform the transfer as required, code it as uncovered, and then, later, correct the tax lot cost basis and send a corrected statement when the information is received. All inheritance allocations will be equally proportional per lot to each recipient unless otherwise notified. One additional situation is the occurrence of a corporate action. Corporate actions require adjustments of the cost bases for each share of stock proportional to the split, distribution, etc. Starting in January of 2011, each Issuing Company will be required to produce an internally generated number applicable and unique to each corporate action that reflects either the adjustment per new share or the cost basis percentage of older shares, so that proportional adjustments, per that specific corporate action, can be performed on the shares presented for transfer. Failure to provide the unique Corporate Action Number will result in a rejection of the transfer request. The Corporate Action Number will be required by FINRA prior to approval of your corporate action request applications. This is a technical and complicated new law and the problematic issues within the law have not yet been resolved. Please call us if you have any questions.
|
|