Post by sandi66 on Jan 5, 2011 18:52:42 GMT -5
Subj: Chucky Q & A
By sherry
Well chucky from where I sit you were lied to too! None of what you argued so vigorisouly as fact was nothing other than rumor and plenty believed you because you said it was FACT. I hope that you will use more caution in your posting and use IMO .
____________________________
By chucky
Sherry,
I wasn't lied to. Something happened based on facts that you are not privy to. We were supposed to be paid period. Someone broke the law and will pay dearly.
FACT, no rumors.
________________________________
By lulu
Thanks Chucky does your source think that it will be taken care of by weeks end and we will get paid
_________________________
By chucky
That's his belief and he will be checking constantly. When he knows, I will know.
_____________________________
By cao
Ok Chucky, you said:
Wasn't lied to. Something happeed based on facts that you are not privy to. We were supposed to be paid period. Someone broke the law and will pay dearly.
FACT, no rumors.
Lets retrace our steps. Your source indicated to you last week that packages were shipped, but now someone broke the law and they were not shipped. I don't think you're referring to the SC directive as the law being broken, since its not a law.
Did someone block the shipment at the courier service forcibly? At this stage, we are all just trying to understand and while it seems you have renewed vigor on us getting paid, it doesn't seem likely...but we want to believe!!!!
_______________________________
By chucky
Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word "law". The SC directive was not adhered to, I mentioned this several times already. I also said I cannot and will not provide the details due to the sensitive nature of them.
______________________________
By Lt.kk
For the first time I have a minor disagreement with Chucky's info...I believe the Chinese have a great deal to do with the leverage placed for us to get paid. They are in the same proverbial boat we are and we know that IBM had contact with the Chinese. Lt.KK
____________________________
By chucky
I would normally agree with LtKK on this point, however the SC Directive will be adhered to regardless of the Chinese and/or WGS involvement. That's not to say they aren't also being used as leverage, I just don't believe it to be necessary for us to get paid. Yes, I did say the SC directive will be adhered to. Money is a powerful motivator.
________________________________
By stew pitt
I would PM you but I am sure you are getting killed with them. I have a few questions for you sir.
Who exactly has control or holding us up over pushing the release button? Is it the President, government agency(if so, which), bank, or trustee? Who is communicating with your sources?
I understand if you can not answer.
Thanks,
Stew
________________________________
By chucky
Good questions however as previously stated I cannot get into the details of this temporary hold up.
________________________________
By osaycanuc
What motive could Al and plaintiffs have to lie to us?
_______________________________
By chucky
They didn't lie. They were lied to
_____________________________
By floridagem
I agree....Chucky you also said your source had DIRECT knowledge of packets being sent. IF he had direct knowledge and he was not lied to then why have we not received our packets?
Do you have a different definition of DIRECT than we do?
Thanks
_____________________________
By chucky
I'll say it one last time for those having a difficult time understanding.
Something happened to temporarily prevent packets from being sent, something that you are not privy to. It's being dealt with.
By sherry
Well chucky from where I sit you were lied to too! None of what you argued so vigorisouly as fact was nothing other than rumor and plenty believed you because you said it was FACT. I hope that you will use more caution in your posting and use IMO .
____________________________
By chucky
Sherry,
I wasn't lied to. Something happened based on facts that you are not privy to. We were supposed to be paid period. Someone broke the law and will pay dearly.
FACT, no rumors.
________________________________
By lulu
Thanks Chucky does your source think that it will be taken care of by weeks end and we will get paid
_________________________
By chucky
That's his belief and he will be checking constantly. When he knows, I will know.
_____________________________
By cao
Ok Chucky, you said:
Wasn't lied to. Something happeed based on facts that you are not privy to. We were supposed to be paid period. Someone broke the law and will pay dearly.
FACT, no rumors.
Lets retrace our steps. Your source indicated to you last week that packages were shipped, but now someone broke the law and they were not shipped. I don't think you're referring to the SC directive as the law being broken, since its not a law.
Did someone block the shipment at the courier service forcibly? At this stage, we are all just trying to understand and while it seems you have renewed vigor on us getting paid, it doesn't seem likely...but we want to believe!!!!
_______________________________
By chucky
Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word "law". The SC directive was not adhered to, I mentioned this several times already. I also said I cannot and will not provide the details due to the sensitive nature of them.
______________________________
By Lt.kk
For the first time I have a minor disagreement with Chucky's info...I believe the Chinese have a great deal to do with the leverage placed for us to get paid. They are in the same proverbial boat we are and we know that IBM had contact with the Chinese. Lt.KK
____________________________
By chucky
I would normally agree with LtKK on this point, however the SC Directive will be adhered to regardless of the Chinese and/or WGS involvement. That's not to say they aren't also being used as leverage, I just don't believe it to be necessary for us to get paid. Yes, I did say the SC directive will be adhered to. Money is a powerful motivator.
________________________________
By stew pitt
I would PM you but I am sure you are getting killed with them. I have a few questions for you sir.
Who exactly has control or holding us up over pushing the release button? Is it the President, government agency(if so, which), bank, or trustee? Who is communicating with your sources?
I understand if you can not answer.
Thanks,
Stew
________________________________
By chucky
Good questions however as previously stated I cannot get into the details of this temporary hold up.
________________________________
By osaycanuc
What motive could Al and plaintiffs have to lie to us?
_______________________________
By chucky
They didn't lie. They were lied to
_____________________________
By floridagem
I agree....Chucky you also said your source had DIRECT knowledge of packets being sent. IF he had direct knowledge and he was not lied to then why have we not received our packets?
Do you have a different definition of DIRECT than we do?
Thanks
_____________________________
By chucky
I'll say it one last time for those having a difficult time understanding.
Something happened to temporarily prevent packets from being sent, something that you are not privy to. It's being dealt with.