Posts by bhollenegg

[sandi66]

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/06
« Result #2 Yesterday at 1:34pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 1:12pm, prof wrote:
I've been on vacation for a couple of weeks and read where the Joint Chiefs of Staff are involved in this. Having worked with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, assuming that JCS stands for that, I have never heard nor read where anything like payouts would be part of their mission statement. Can anyone explain how they could be involved in CMKX? I may have missed something in reading back posts. Thanks.

Prof


Reply:

It has to do with National Security.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg

[sandi66]

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/06
« Result #1 Yesterday at 2:01pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 1:34pm, mgpaul wrote: Bob, I posted this in another thread but you may have not seen it. Can to comment if you can on the points posted by pongo below?

TIA


lt.kk

Some facts..
« Thread Started Today at 8:27am »

1. We have a source reliable beyond reproach, Thank God!

2. The packets have been physically seen by representatives of the source.

3. Admiral Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has met with President Obama and the Finance Minister of China( they want their $$ too) twice in the last 2 days.

4. The Joint Chiefs are assuring that the WGS are released according to the SC recommendation

5. Congress has nothing further to do with the release of our funds or the WGS so their taking any time off will not effect their release

6. The vote on the tax cuts has absolutely no bearing on the release of our funds.

7. We are closer to the end than ever before and will have our packets before the end of the year. Also remember that the Government end of the year is at the end of next week for all intensive purposes.

8. You are free to believe whatever you want in this matter and listen to any source whether they may be dependable, informed or dealing in pure speculation.

9. There are dedicated people on top of this situation working everyday ( weekends included ) to assure your ROI.

10. Our ROI will make all of this worthwhile and we will move forward together to find remedies for a very ill world.

11. My sincere wishes to you and your families for a wonderful holiday season.

Lt.KK



Reply:

MGPaul...I will answer what I can.

1. Not sure which source Lt KK is referring to.

2, 3,4,5....I cannot comment any more than I have...National Security issues.

6. I haven't heard anything that would validate or dispute that statement.

7. I agree with the first sentence.The second sentence I am not sure what Lt KK is referring to, Holiday break or the Fiscal Year. The FY of the U.S. Government ends September 30.

8,9,10,11. I agree.

All the best,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg

[sandi66]

From CMKX Unofficial Board - December 12, 2010

Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Result #9 Yesterday at 3:17pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 2:48pm, briwadd wrote:
Yesterday at 2:37pm, sweetsp7 wrote:Re: The Buzz Chat 12/06
« Reply #395 Today at 2:01pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 1:34pm, mgpaul wrote:Bob, I posted this in another thread but you may have not seen it. Can to comment if you can on the points posted by pongo below?

TIA


lt.kk

Some facts..
« Thread Started Today at 8:27am »

1. We have a source reliable beyond reproach, Thank God!

2. The packets have been physically seen by representatives of the source.

3. Admiral Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has met with President Obama and the Finance Minister of China( they want their $$ too) twice in the last 2 days.

4. The Joint Chiefs are assuring that the WGS are released according to the SC recommendation

5. Congress has nothing further to do with the release of our funds or the WGS so their taking any time off will not effect their release

6. The vote on the tax cuts has absolutely no bearing on the release of our funds.

7. We are closer to the end than ever before and will have our packets before the end of the year. Also remember that the Government end of the year is at the end of next week for all intensive purposes.

8. You are free to believe whatever you want in this matter and listen to any source whether they may be dependable, informed or dealing in pure speculation.

9. There are dedicated people on top of this situation working everyday ( weekends included ) to assure your ROI.

10. Our ROI will make all of this worthwhile and we will move forward together to find remedies for a very ill world.

11. My sincere wishes to you and your families for a wonderful holiday season.

Lt.KK





MGPaul...I will answer what I can.

1. Not sure which source Lt KK is referring to.

2, 3,4,5....I cannot comment any more than I have...National Security issues.

6. I haven't heard anything that would validate or dispute that statement.

7. I agree with the first sentence.The second sentence I am not sure what Lt KK is referring to, Holiday break or the Fiscal Year. The FY of the U.S. Government ends September 30.

8,9,10,11. I agree.

All the best,
BHollenegg
Report to Mod - Link to Post - Back to Top Logged

millionaires.proboards.com/index.....d=35625&page=20



Instead of saying he can't comment due to National Security Issues, why don't he just say "I don't know". I have a hard time believeing that Bob or any other plantiff has information regarding National Security. Furthermore, I find it difficult to believe that Pongo also has information that can jeopardize national security if released.

IMO
Briwadd



Reply:

Briwadd...if I don't know I would have posted "I don't know". There are prudent reasons why this cannot be discussed...plus I am not allowed to confirm or deny any more than I have on that subject.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

*************************

Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Result #8 Yesterday at 3:31pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 3:20pm, briwadd wrote:
Yesterday at 3:17pm, BHollenegg wrote:


Briwadd...if I don't know I would have posted "I don't know". There are prudent reasons why this cannot be discussed...plus I am not allowed to confirm or deny any more than I have on that subject.

Thank you,
BHollenegg





Bob, I have been critical (at times) but supportive (overall) of you providing shareholders with information. While I understand that you have information that you are not permitted to share, I don't believe that information will jeopardize National Security.

Thanks
Briwadd



Reply:

Briwadd...you believing or not believing will not change the fact that it is what it is....an issue with national security, not with me.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

*********************

Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Result #7 Yesterday at 3:50pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 3:38pm, soonerlew wrote:
Yesterday at 3:31pm, BHollenegg wrote:


Briwadd...you believing or not believing will not change the fact that it is what it is....an issue with national security, not with me.

Thank you,
BHollenegg



WHY can't someone or something move them at a faster pace? Do they not understand that people are in a world of hurt here? Can someone not send them the messages we see here as how people have lost homes and jobs?

Is not seven or eight years of this enough for even them? I would think they'd like to move on to something else to handle.

Surely we have more important items dealing with National Security that should be handled!!!

AIMHO..............

Reply:

Soonerlew...I understand the situation with the Shareholders. Attorney Hodges does as well and has fought every step of the way to have the funds released asap. We are on the side of the Shareholders...always have been, and always will be.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

************************

Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Result #6 Yesterday at 4:26pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 3:58pm, briwadd wrote:
Yesterday at 3:31pm, BHollenegg wrote:


Briwadd...you believing or not believing will not change the fact that it is what it is....an issue with national security, not with me.

Thank you,
BHollenegg



Oh well..to each his own.

Although, if being a plantiff in a lawsuit against the government makes you privy to national security issues, America is in trouble.

Briwadd




Reply:

Briwadd...why do you think the JCS is involved? The plaintiffs are not privy to every detail, but they are privy to information that is confidential and private. I shared as much as I can. I understand the frustration, but how much you or I know in this area at this time will not speed up the process.

Thank you Briwadd,
BHollenegg

********************

Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Result #5 Yesterday at 4:27pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 3:54pm, partymartypa2 wrote:
Yesterday at 3:31pm, BHollenegg wrote:


Briwadd...you believing or not believing will not change the fact that it is what it is....an issue with national security, not with me.

Thank you,
BHollenegg





Bob, I think most here believe that you would not post about National Security issues if not true. I for one and brother Bill believe you about this issue and that we will be more financially well off beginining 1st of the year, if not sooner.


Marty

reply:

Thank you Marty and Bill,
BHollenegg

**********************

Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Result #4 Yesterday at 5:02pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 4:40pm, wolfbela wrote:I suggest we use our energies to attempt to contact these entities and see if there is any awareness of World Global Settlement funds or CMKX or whatever, or if this is another wild goose chase..

I will do some research...

For easy reading...

www.jcs.mil

J WB

Reply:

Wolfbela...please stay away from doing anything in this area until after the first of the year, if it is necessary. How about your White House contact? Can you post the contact details? This would be an excellent way for the Shareholders' messages to get personal attention by the President.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

*********************

Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Result #3 Yesterday at 6:42pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 5:28pm, wolfbela wrote:Bob,

I have attempted on more than one occasion to get this information to Mr. Hodges, only to be rebuffed. Not only is he a White House employee, he is a shareholder, gotten into this stock by me. For months, I informed the Hodges' office of this contact, but I was told people come to the Mountain, the Mountain does not come to them.

I am done with trying to get info to Mr. Hodges. I am very dissatisfied with all of the goings on and it is past ridiculous that no one involved in this.. Hodges or Tyler... can give us one answer of substance.

Out of respect to you, I will wait before bombarding the Pentagon and the JCS with inquiries. But tell those who are spearheading whatever is going on, our patience has grown beyond thin and come the new year, if we have or know nothing, we will seek legal and political help, as well as continue on with the AG action and seek the takeover of the operation of CMKX.

Since our company chooses not to communicate respectfully in anyway with the shareholders, we are left with no choice.

So Bob, I will wait, as per your request..

I hope my request of simple respect to these wonderful CMKX shareholders, as in some simple answers of substance, will be honored as well..

And Bob, come the new year, if none of this happens, I ask you to seriously consider joining us and adding strength to our efforts by bringing your support and the support you generate amongst shareholders to our cause.
Perhaps we will be the only game left in town, and we would certainly want your participation and expertise.

Jerry WB


Reply:

Jerry....I support the great work the AG Group are doing in support of those who are actively and actually making progress in releasing the funds to the Shareholders. I always have and I will continue to do so. I will not support any attempts to run interference to those working for the release of the funds the Shareholders.


Attorney Hodges has my support because he is the one who is fighting for the Shareholders, has made the most progress, has dedicated his time, staff, assets, knowledge, skills, and experience and never gave up even when others gave up their support and presence. I know of several Shareholders who hired attorneys, including you, and their attorneys dropped them.



Thank you Jerry,
BHollenegg

***********************

Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Result #2 Yesterday at 6:58pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 5:59pm, Z06mike wrote:
Yesterday at 5:28pm, wolfbela wrote:Bob,

I have attempted on more than one occasion to get this information to Mr. Hodges, only to be rebuffed. Not only is he a White House employee, he is a shareholder, gotten into this stock by me. For months, I informed the Hodges' office of this contact, but I was told people come to the Mountain, the Mountain does not come to them.

I am done with trying to get info to Mr. Hodges. I am very dissatisfied with all of the goings on and it is past ridiculous that no one involved in this.. Hodges or Tyler... can give us one answer of substance.

Out of respect to you, I will wait before bombarding the Pentagon and the JCS with inquiries. But tell those who are spearheading whatever is going on, our patience has grown beyond thin and come the new year, if we have or know nothing, we will seek legal and political help, as well as continue on with the AG action and seek the takeover of the operation of CMKX.

Since our company chooses not to communicate respectfully in anyway with the shareholders, we are left with no choice.

So Bob, I will wait, as per your request..

I hope my request of simple respect to these wonderful CMKX shareholders, as in some simple answers of substance, will be honored as well..

And Bob, come the new year, if none of this happens, I ask you to seriously consider joining us and adding strength to our efforts by bringing your support and the support you generate amongst shareholders to our cause.
Perhaps we will be the only game left in town, and we would certainly want your participation and expertise.

Jerry WB




Bob,

I echo Jerry on this. You have become the shareholder's voice. If the New Year comes and goes, you may be the catalyst to get this Battleship out of the bath tub and turned around.

Mike


Reply:

Agree Mike. I will do what ever takes to release the funds to the Shareholders if it comes to that point and time.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

********************

Re: ***Rumor Discussion Thread***
« Result #1 Yesterday at 7:44pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 6:53pm, wolfbela wrote:Bob,

Just to clarify.. I never hired an attorney in my court case. When I showed my attorney and friend the Hodges fax releases, he thought it was a joke. That is not what I am writing about.

We are not seeking to cause interference with the effort, rather we seek a small bit of honesty and transparency that no one seems willing to offer.

I am just asking how long will you go down this road till perhaps you change your way of thinking if things don't come to fruition as you have stated and been told.

If at some point you become disenchanted with the goings on, we welcome you with open arms. I would be interested in knowing what kind of time limit you would place on your patience. Meaning if we are not paid in 6 months from today, would you then doubt what you are being told and perhaps seek another way to have this completed or investigated.

I like your spaceman pict, BTW...cool...

Sincerely,





J WB


Reply:

Jerry....six months is way too long. I believe this is a mute point.

The photo used in the avatar is the U2 Flight Suit the Driver (Pilot) wears for high altitude missions. If you press the keys <ctrl><+> several times it will make the photo larger...<Ctrl><-> will reduce the page . You will see the reflection of the US Flag and a U2 Aircraft on the visor. Also, you will see a dragon wrapped around the U2 Aircraft on the wall above the helmet. The U2 Spy Plane is called the Dragon Lady. It can be one of the most difficult aircraft to pilot. When the aircraft is performing well, it is like dancing with a Lady. When the aircraft is not performing well, it is like fighting a dragon. Here is a link to what it is like to fly in a U2 Spy Plane. I worked with the Pilot in the video.

www.wimp.com/breathtakingfootage/

Thank you,
BHollenegg



cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg

[subtlerise]

In light of Melvins "moment" in pal-talk this morning and given that he may still have sources as former IR, I would like to ask you something. I am sorry too, that I have to burden you but of course you do have the most respect and character of anyone I know in CMKX land and have the best source.

Given the fact that Al has mentioned/accused presidents, "current & former" CIA, DTCC, SEC, DOJ and on and on and on, in correspondence, why can't he simply tell us what the current hold-up is? Everyone seems to be looking for packets in the mail? It's obvious that no packets are in route, so why does he not just tell us he will notify us when they are sent out? Tell us where we are and what the next step is. What is so hard about that? Surely he understands that we "at least some of us" are going insane?

We have "posters in the know" telling us everything is fine, cherry, just be patient a while longer, packets are coming, packets are not coming.... The "ONE" poster we want to hear from, doesn't post. Why? Is this akin to UFO"s, where we can't handle the truth?

I know there will be a ton of posters behind this post crying foul, but it is what it is. And what it is, is a lack of meaningfull communication.

I would simply like to know what is next and how it will be handled. Sorry for the rambling.

Sincerely,
Mike



JBGood....Attorney Hodges said he will notify the Shareholders when ER is received. ER (permission) occurs before anything can be sent out. Attorney Hodges has explained this in his updates.

There are numerous rumors every hour. I have spent many hours trying to verify what is true and what is not. I receive numerous emails and private messages asking if various information are correct. Attorney Hodges has put out updates, but rumors seem to take on a life of its own. There are choices. I am sticking with what Attorney Hodges provides. I will provide the Shareholders who are interested in receiving updates with the information as it becomes available from Attorney Hodges.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=35863&page=2

[sandi66]

December 15, 2010 from Millionaires board

Re: Question for BHollenegg
« Reply #42 Yesterday at 6:29am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dec 14, 2010, 9:37pm, hawaiiangirl wrote:Aloha Bob,

Mahalo for the ride in the Spy plane....what a ride....not like the Fort Shafter helicopter!!!! (no Santa)
Really enjoyed it....would love to have experience it! I've jumped out of planes and piloted a few small aircrafts...you were very lucky to be involved with that aircraft.
I know you worked with the plane...but did you go up or fly it?

P.s. get some rest seems you've been up all night and day!
Look forward to meet you soon!


Reply:

Aloha Hawaiiangirl,

No, I have not been up in the U2 Spy Plane. I will when we are paid.

Here are some photos of my daughter visiting her dad's work area. My daughter on the wing of the U2, in the U2 cockpit, and being briefed by a U2 pilot about the helmet. We tried to suit up my daughter in the space suit, but she refused because she thought we were trying to get her to fly the plane.






Here is a high altitude jump with a Hawaiian flare at the end
www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3yeH2k6w2M&feature=player_embedded



Mahalo and All the Best,
BHollenegg



millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=35863&page=3#501025

[subtlerise]

Bob , the problem is that I can't stand NOT being told the truth! At the same time
I also admit we can't be told the true activities that are going on behind the scenes!
Just because the truth can't be said it doesn't mean people can make stuff up
and feed it to us! Off the top of my head are .....

We did't get ER because ....

There was a problem at the bank!

There was a snow storm!

The elections!

The Black farmers!

The Indians!

Sun spots! ( ok I threw that one in ! )


There have, without a doubt been hard battles fought behind the scenes for sure
and many excuses might have been valid, but because of the really stupid lame
excuses it takes away a good chunk of credibility! All this has been ongoing for YEARS!
We weren't even supposed to need to file the Bivens way back in
January of last year for we were told they would concede and wouldn't dare let us file it!

Instead of using liars try using misinformers as it seems to be a less harsh word!
The definitions are rather similar!


lie
A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood.
Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.

mis·in·form
To provide with incorrect information.
to give false or misleading information to.


You have to admit that for the most part of this journey we were MISINFORMED on a regular basis because the truth could never be told!

Sorry if I seemed harsh, so lets just say I'm fed up being misinformed to!

I believe it was deemed necessary to be creative and use plausible excuses
for delays as it would please a greater number of shareholders. just think
how long they would last is the simply repeated the same " There is another
delay can't say what it is but we're working on it" ! So they use whats in
the news to give credibility to the misinformation and everyone goes "Ah so
the delay is caused by the blank blank blank! OK lets move on to next week or next month!" But even if you call it misinformation its still lying!
Little white lies are still lies!

Someone who tells little white lies is NOT usually regarded as a LIAR!
I don't regard those who are trying to get our funds released as LIARS!
But you must understand that I don't have to LIKE being lied to,even if its a white
lie for "Our own good! " !
If the misinformation can't satisfy 90% of the shareholders, fine. But I'm in the 10%.

If we're really at the end game, I definitely want the misinformation to stop!

And for the record Robert, I really appreciate all you, Al and the rest of the team
are doing! I'm just not a fan of misinformation!

Pete

Peterg2000....You should check out the facts before you go around calling people liars, especially those who are working in your favor...Attorney Hodges and the Plaintiffs did not lie and never said shareholders were "lied to for their own good". The statement "shareholders were lied to for their own good" came from a non-plaintiff on PalTalk, and was posted by a member on millionaires that a plaintiff said this. When questioned which plaintiff said this, the person named someone who is not a plaintiff. That was straightened up, but you keep posting this.

There is a protective stipulation in the WGS (World Global Settlement) which requires all Trust accounts to be fully funded before any distributions can be released. The stipulation to release the funds was made to protect the smaller funds. Attorney Hodges fought this and several times was successful in separating the CMKX distribution funds, but at the last minute the CMKX Distribution was stopped by the trustees of the smaller accounts. Attorney Hodges went to Richmond to get the the accounts that required legal work to complete the funding. The other delays were...

Bank problem....one of the trustees embezzled 100 Million Dollars from one of the WGS Funds. The bank official was arrested. The missing funds were replaced.

Snow...Arctic-type Snowstorm shut down Washington D.C. The key officials could not make it in to complete and check out the funding and distribution.

The President...the funds were scheduled to be released Memorial weekend. The President stopped all releases until he returned from his trip from the BP Oil spill. Your guess is as good as mine as to why the President delayed the disbursements.

The elections....this one made me angry because they knew the elections were going to take place the week after the distribution was scheduled. The release would follow after a public service announcement on all major networks nationwide. This was the trigger to release CMKX Funds. The officials decided to wait after the elections. CMKX Distributions are not the only distributions. The funds involve other countries, which involves national security. The newly elected are required to be briefed within 30 days. Attorney Hodges fought this delay. They agreed to a 10 day schedule.

CMKX is part of the largest distributions in the history of the World Economics. Problems do occur. The shear size of the distributions requires minimal mistakes and maximum security.

Whether you like it or not, whether you believe it or not, whether you agree with it or not, you were provided with the correct information at the current time. Changes do occur, especially when this involves the amount of money, entites, countries, signatures, recepiants, logistics, coordination, documents preparations and exchanges...on and on.

You may not appreciate what Attorney Hodges is doing for us; you may not understand what is going on; you may not have all the information available to you; that is not your fault. Calling us liars is wrong. No matter what you think and post, Attorney Hodges will prevail for the Shareholders and is appreciated by many Shareholders.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

Whether its admitted or not we ARE being fed MISINFORMATION!
So Ok, instead saying they are lying as it is a more harsh term I'll just say
they are misinforming us! You are wrong when you think I DON'T appreciate
what Al and his team are doing, because I do. This has been going on for way
longer than anyone every expected! At one point misinformation was justifiable
when it was thought to be for the short term! But now it has dragged out for years
and many are hurting with failing health and financial troubles! Every time
a date comes and goes and another excuse pops up the wounds go deeper!

Al has put forth Christmas as a potential date! I hope that if he needs to
go past that date then he step up and be as honest as he can to let everyone
know what the reason is! If no other entity is holding us up then say so!
If it really IS logistics then say so! Just NOT sunspots!


I've tried to explain it as best I could. I'll drop the subject for now, since we'll be paid
by next Friday! Right!



Pete...

The delays were real and not misinformation. Again, the reason for the delays and having to take care of more situations are..
CMKX is part of the largest distributions in the history of the World Economics. Problems do occur. The shear size of the distributions requires minimal mistakes and maximum security.

Whether you like it or not, whether you believe it or not, whether you agree with it or not, you were provided with the correct information at the current time. Changes do occur, especially when this involves the amount of money, entites, countries, signatures, recepiants, logistics, coordination, documents preparations and exchanges...on and on.

Thank you Peter,
BHollenegg
millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=35957&page=5

[sandi66]

December 20, 2010

Re: IMO: Has Al Hodges gone to the dark side?
« Reply #69 Yesterday at 6:08am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dec 19, 2010, 6:29pm, retflyr2 wrote:
Dec 19, 2010, 6:05pm, emptywallet wrote:There must be a lemonade stand selling tainted drinks.



The thread was a (question) for other people to give comments, though I do not back down on content.

Other than a few stating we may or will get payed, little difference fron the last 6 or 7 years.

The good part shareholders may finally know something in a few weeks. If nothing I already have my post done with this.

Retflyr2


Reply:

Retflyr... your statement "However one can not help wonder if Al Hodges has not joined the dark side, and taken the Plaintiffs with him", I find highly insulting as a plaintiff, as a shareholder, and as someone who did not hesitate to put their life at risk in serving their country over 30 years and serving the Shareholders. I did this because it is the right thing to do, not just for this generation, but for many generations. I did not come all this way just to end up joining the dark side. I can assure you that Attorney Hodges and the rest of the Plaintiffs do not fall in the dark side category.

Rooting for your team to win, then sticking your leg out and tripping them up as they approach the finish line is not the way to success...it is the way to distress, unless you are with the opposing team.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=35983&page=4#503423

***************************

Re: Call/message to Kevin West..
« Reply #32 Yesterday at 10:40pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 10:22pm, vcalv wrote:
Yesterday at 10:18pm, BHollenegg wrote:

Due to the circumstances, I am not allowed to communicate. Attorney Hodges will communicate.

Please direct your questions to Wolfbela.

Thank you,
BHollenegg



Bob,
Don't do this to me please....not tonight (having a bad day).
Did you hear something big from Al?? Will we hear something tomorrow maybe??

Thanks in advance.


Reply:

Vcalv...Attorney Hodges is working this as stated. Attorney Hodges will be the one to communicate with the Shareholders. Please stay positive.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7761&page=3#104056

[sandi66]

December 21, 2010

Re: Call/message to Kevin West..
« Reply #39 Today at 3:53am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 1:39am, tripper wrote:
Yesterday at 10:44pm, ChuckWheat wrote:Hi Vcalv,

While I'm not Bob (obviously), I think he's already answered. We all know Mr Hodges and rest of the team have been working on finalizing everything...hang in there.

I leave everyone with this thought: If you had a choice between everything being done to the 95% level and released with a possibility of something not being done right...or having to wait a bit longer to ensure everything is 100% right...would you really want the possibility that things could get hung up in the post-funds release period?

As much as I would like this to be done for all of us, I'd really prefer it be done right over done fast.

I hope your day improves-

With Respects,
C-Dub





Chuck,

Why is it so d*mn hard to communicate when this thing is apparently done? What Bob and you are alluding to seems to be administrative issues. If this is the case why not say so? Why is it so imperative that shareholders must be kept in the dark about every insignificant action? And when I say insignificant I refer to answers to questions that would not derail what ever plan has been initiated.

For example, If a shareholder asks if we have received ER or not, why would a simple "Yes we have" or "No we have not" put in jeopardy any strategic advantage. And why would we need a strategic advantage if this is done?

In contrast we hear about the intricate workings of CIA, joint chiefs, kings, queens and the intricacies of how each one of them are associated with our little penny stock. The things that you would think one would be tight lipped over are spoke about in depth, but god forbid you ask if we have received ER or if there is a plan to appeal the MTD or anything else that would be seemingly appropriate to speak about in comparison to the secrets that has been exposed over and over again.

It seems that any question that leads to a definitive answer as to whether or not Hodges is full of you know what, is left unanswered.
Which naturally leads people to that very conclusion.

tripper





Reply:

Tripper, if we don't hear from Attorney Hodges, then we don't have ER. If we have ER , then Attorney Hodges will make an announcement to the Shareholders.

Thank you,
BHollenegg


cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7761&page=3#104083

------------------------------

Re: Call/message to Kevin West..
« Reply #42 Today at 6:40am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 4:48am, wolfbela wrote:Bob,

In your deleted post where you suggest I answer questions, I would love to do so, had some honest answers been provided. This cat and mouse game is beyond old. I am a pretty intelligent guy. I can understand basic honest details.
I have never tried to be disrespectful to you. I am frustrated with Al Hodges and Tyler. This madness has gone on long enough. April 12 money is transferred. December 21, still no payment..
These are the facts as you have told us, if the first date was true and you weren't being misled. Certainly you realize how ridiculous this is.
I have not made one prediction, not one. No PPS , no dates of payment, no nothing.. If by some miracle this does happen, I have said repeatly, I will be first in line to thank and congratulate all. Do I realize the enormity of this, if it is true.. absolutely. I also know at some point, this must end, one way or the other. Just one ounce of transparency would have changed everyone's outlook here, but I guess those in charge didn't think our security clearance was appropriate. Best wishes..

Jerry WB




Jerry...After I wrote the post, I deleted it because you did what I did in December 2008 and in January 2009. I understand your frustration, but not your timing. This is not about keeping your word...this is not about Wolfbela and BHollenegg...this is about doing what is best for getting the Shareholders paid as quick as possible.

When we did the Blitz Campaign a couple of years ago, it became evident that we ended up being blocked. I spoke with Attorney Hodges and asked for his help. Attorney Hodges said he would, and did without ever asking for compensation. When it got to the point that a lawsuit was required , I agreed to be a plaintiff only if this lawsuit would result in the Shareholders being compensated. After seeing what Attorney Hodges had to deal with, I know now how naive I was about the complexity of the situation and the legal issues and maneuvers which had to be addressed and taken care of in order to get the release resolved. I understand your frustration and your desire to get this done, but reinventing the wheel at this stage when we are at the cusp of receiving the funds will not speed up the process.

You drew a line in the sand, January 1, 2011. I agree. In the meantime please don't kick the sand in the faces of those who are getting the Shareholders paid.

Thank you Jerry,
BHollenegg

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7761&page=3#104089

[sandi66]

December 21, 2010

Shareholders
« Thread Started Yesterday at 10:27pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When you take partial information and throw in your own opinions, you end up with a slanted view of what the author wants to project and not the actual facts. Rumors and misleading opinions at this stage will not get the Shareholders paid, just upset.


ER (permission) is received when all accounts are ready for distribution. There are several processes which takes place in the distribution. Funds are moved to different staging areas to cover the various areas. Packages are shipped to various distribution centers ready for distribution. Once everything is in place, ER is obtained and the releases are completed at the same time. These steps are taken to ensure all recipients receive their part of the distributions.

All involved are working to get the distribution accomplished by Christmas. Attorney Hodges is optimistic that the distribution will be done by Christmas. Attorney Hodges will make an announcement to the Shareholders as soon as the ER is confirmed and the distribution commences. The President will be making several announcements to the Nation. Please understand this is huge in every aspect, logistics, funds, people involved, security, and more...

Please wait for the official announcements.

Thank you,
BHolleneegg

« Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:30pm by BHollenegg »

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7776&page=1#104328

[misisipiflyer]

By: bhollenegg

Anything that would compromise security and safety could jeopardize the distribution process.

Security precautions are in effect for several reasons.

1. Protection of Trustees
2. Protection of Funds
3. Protection of Recipients
4. Protection of those involved with the Distribution.

What could possibly happen?

With this amount of money...
1. Trustees threatened.
2. Message Boards are monitored by others who are not shareholders, but have an interest gathering information about the funds , how much, who is receiving the funds. Example..one account monitoring the boards had 13 IP Addresses (one account) in a country known to harbor terrorist.
3. Delivery Services Carrier compromised to find out the addresses of the recipients.
4. Recipients threatened

Any of these areas are compromised, would trigger measures to identify and correct the compromises.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

[sandi66]

Re: Merry Christmas bhollenegg
« Reply #9 Today at 12:40pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you....the rumor circulating that there is allegedly a first payment check in the amount of $0.80/share in the package does correlate with the update I received. I have not received any further update from what I have already posted. Please wait for an official announcement and confirmation. Thank you.


Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to All.
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=36127&page=1#506415

[sandi66]

Re: Thank You Bob For Answering My Question
« Reply #1 Today at 12:41pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 9:48am, diamondogg11 wrote:Bob,

Thank you for replying to my question.

You know what would make my Christmas and New Year's (even if we don't get paid by 1-01-11?)...

Would be for an affirmative to just the one question.. (and Briwad mentioned it in his post already)..

Why couldn't you or one of the plaintiffs ask Mr. Hodges the simple question.. "Mr Hodges, have you personally seen or have personal knowledge of what is in the packets?"

I think the answer to this question.. if the answer is YES.. would alleviate much of the negative speculation (at least it would for me)..

I think after all the missed deadlines.. that is the least we could ask for.. just some clarification that what is being said has a little more MEAT to it..

Imo there is a big difference between speculating or taking somebody elses word for a Trust or Packet earmarked for shareholders and having personal knowledge of one..

I don't mean to beat the dead horse.. (and this will be my last post on this issue at least during this Christmas Holiday).. but making the statement that was made (about receiving packets by Christmas) leads to some high expectations.. if we are left completely empty handed again.. then putting SOMETHING in that "empty hand" in the form of just a little reassurance could go a long way.

Thank you again for replying to my message.. and even though I might seem to be a shareholder who is constantly pressing for answers (lately).. I really do appreciate the effort you make on behalf of the shareholders.

Merry Christmas Bob.

dd


Reply:

DD....the rumor circulating that there is allegedly a first payment check in the amount of $0.80/share in the package does correlate with the update I received. I have not received any further update from what I have already posted. Please wait for an official announcement and confirmation. Thank you.


Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to All.
BHollenegg


cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7827&page=1#105192

[sandi66]

December 26, 2010


Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #19 Today at 12:04am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 2:58am, ines wrote:I went to midnight mass.

Actualy thought about kindness, which is important..
and I actualy have thought about what i have been writing or trying to ask bobholenegg to respond to...

then i came home and read again all the questions that people ask for bob, and his responses.. and indeed there are no answers, but retoric repetition of things that just go in circles and provide no straight answers at all.

I dont know what Hodges is doing, I dont know if there is larger team and what they are doing.
I dont know if there is any good reason.. for this talk in circles.. that provides no real information or answers to shareholders direct questions.

But i do know that direct and pointed questions that shareholders ask are not answered.. and that they are avoided... and instead they are getting these responses that dance around the real issues in some sort of ..
automatic response..


So kindness is important..
but it really should go both ways.


Reply:

Ines..when I embarked on trying to get an official confirmation on the funds for the Shareholders, you stated that I was doing this for attention. I am doing this because I care for the Shareholders and want justice to prevail. I try my best to answer your questions but you continue to badger, twist what I post, and condemn me constantly and on several boards. Please understand, I am doing the best I can in keeping the Shareholders up to date with what is transpiring with the funds. You are just as capable, even more so because you have your health, to go after the release of the funds. Instead of the unproductive and constant badgering, and relentless attacks on me, please focus your energy in areas that will be productive and will contribute to getting the funds to the Shareholders.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg

***************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #18 Today at 12:42am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 12:23am, stockrich wrote:



"...packets, staging areas, regional banks"


"ER" sounds like a precise, timed, coordinated effort.

".80" cents for "fines & penalties" is another interesting tidbit, because it's an opportunity to pay us something without engaging the shareholders in 'stock issues'...which as we all know will take time as many will need to seek counsel.

I would like to think from all recent posts that everything is in place, or just about to be so...

So, no more talk about Ines helping, or Wolfbela helping, or GusJarvis helping...there's nothing to help.


...I hope.


Stockrich.


Reply:

My message to Ines was to focus on productive areas. You stated "there's nothing to help". Supporting Attorney Hodges and showing our appreciation for his determination and not giving up on making sure the Shareholders will prevail is something that we can do to help. The majority of the Shareholders do help and are appreciative.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

********************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #17 Today at 12:52am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 12:27am, mgpaul wrote:Sorry Bob but there has been way too many times that statements of imminent payments have come and gone that credibility gets crushed. IMO


Reply:

It is not easy to become a millionaire especially when there will be over 50,000. Fortunately, you won't have to wait too much longer. My apologies if you feel my credibility is an issue.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

*********************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #16 Today at 1:21am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 12:59am, taskforceviking wrote:
Today at 12:52am, bhollenegg wrote:


It is not easy to become a millionaire especially when there will be over 50,000. Fortunately, you won't have to wait too much longer. My apologies if you feel my credibility is an issue.

Thank you,
BHollenegg



TFV...

Re: The Weekly Buzz 12/20
« Reply #20 on Dec 21, 2010, 11:32pm »
bhollenegg






Shareholders



Mr. Hollenegg --

I think these are reasonable and important questions, because they go to the heart of our wait. As Mr. Hodges has stated to the plaintiffs -- once MC has received his funds, then Mr. Hodges can announce ER and the CMKX packets can be released.

Do you really think that Mr. Cottrell is going to be in charge of the $6.2 Trillion U.S. Dollar Re-Funding Project, as Mr. Hodges stated in his letter to Her Majesty the Queen, dated April 26, 2010?

And with your recent rumor of Shareholders to receive .80/share -- are you saying that MC has now received his $6.2 Trillion and Mr. Hodges can announce ER?

Thanks,
TFV




Reply:

TFV,

I post what I know. I have explained this several times.

When a person takes partial information and throws in their own opinions, you end up with a slanted view of what the author wants to project and not the actual facts. Rumors and misleading opinions at this stage will not get the Shareholders paid, just upset.


ER (permission) is received when all accounts are ready for distribution. There are several processes which takes place in the distribution. Funds are moved to different staging areas to cover the various areas. Packages are shipped to various distribution centers ready for distribution. Once everything is in place, ER is obtained and the releases are completed at the same time. These steps are taken to ensure all recipients receive their part of the distributions.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

**********************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #15 Today at 6:45am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 2:33am, taskforceviking wrote:
Today at 1:21am, bhollenegg wrote:




TFV,

I post what I know. I have explained this several times.

When a person takes partial information and throws in their own opinions, you end up with a slanted view of what the author wants to project and not the actual facts. Rumors and misleading opinions at this stage will not get the Shareholders paid, just upset.


ER (permission) is received when all accounts are ready for distribution. There are several processes which takes place in the distribution. Funds are moved to different staging areas to cover the various areas. Packages are shipped to various distribution centers ready for distribution. Once everything is in place, ER is obtained and the releases are completed at the same time. These steps are taken to ensure all recipients receive their part of the distributions.


Thank you,
BHollenegg



Thanks for your response.

But I don't understand -- do you believe that Mr. Cottrell is going to be in charge of a $6.2 Trillion Dollar Re-Funding Project?

Since you are a plaintiff and certainly closer to Mr. Hodges that most of us, I'm wondering if you believe this is reasonable?

And I'm trying to accurately reflect only the words that Mr. Hodges has written -- If I wrong, please tell me precisely where?

Yes -- Mr. Hodges did email the plaintiffs that we are waiting for Mr. Cottrell to receive his funds before he would be able to announce ER and we could then get our packets.

Why is that not relevant?

Thanks,
TFV


Reply:

Thank you Roughcut...live by the rules of success and you will be successful. Excellent post.

Thank you Harv, Rebbeke, Rain and Chuckwheat.

TFV... I do not know Mr. Cottrell. I will not judged Mr. Cottrell, his qualifications or his capabilities or his knowledge. Mr. Cottrell does have intimate knowledge of the WGS Funds and is evidently in a position where he is trusted to handle the responsibilities surrounding trillions of dollars.

Your reference to one of Attorney's update to the plaintiffs and subsequent misinterpretation of the information provided, is what happens when part of the information is taken out of context. Attorney Hodges is not holding back the release of the CMKX Distribution Funds for Mr. Cottrell or any other reason. Attorney Hodges has fought every step of the way to get the release done asap. Attorney Hodges has repeatedly stated he will notify the Shareholders when he receives verification that ER is received.

ER (permission) is received when "all" accounts are ready for distribution. There are several processes which takes place in the distribution. Funds are moved to different staging areas to cover the various areas. Packages are shipped to various distribution centers ready for distribution. Once everything is in place, ER is obtained and the releases are completed at the same time. These steps are taken to ensure all recipients receive their part of the distributions.

Attorney Hodges expected the release and distribution
to occur before Christmas... we are that close to becoming millionaires and we will because of Attorney Hodges work in the final stages, because of supporting Attorney Hodges, and not because of attacking Attorney Hodges.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

***************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #14 Today at 6:31pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 12:07pm, taskforceviking wrote:
Today at 6:45am, bhollenegg wrote:

Thank you Roughcut...live by the rules of success and you will be successful. Excellent post.

Thank you Harv, Rebbeke, Rain and Chuckwheat.

TFV... I do not know Mr. Cottrell. I will not judged Mr. Cottrell, his qualifications or his capabilities or his knowledge. Mr. Cottrell does have intimate knowledge of the WGS Funds and is evidently in a position where he is trusted to handle the responsibilities surrounding trillions of dollars.

Your reference to one of Attorney's update to the plaintiffs and subsequent misinterpretation of the information provided, is what happens when part of the information is taken out of context. Attorney Hodges is not holding back the release of the CMKX Distribution Funds for Mr. Cottrell or any other reason. Attorney Hodges has fought every step of the way to get the release done asap. Attorney Hodges has repeatedly stated he will notify the Shareholders when he receives verification that ER is received.

ER (permission) is received when "all" accounts are ready for distribution. There are several processes which takes place in the distribution. Funds are moved to different staging areas to cover the various areas. Packages are shipped to various distribution centers ready for distribution. Once everything is in place, ER is obtained and the releases are completed at the same time. These steps are taken to ensure all recipients receive their part of the distributions.

Attorney Hodges expected the release and distribution
to occur before Christmas... we are that close to becoming millionaires and we will because of Attorney Hodges work in the final stages, because of supporting Attorney Hodges, and not because of attacking Attorney Hodges.

Thank you,
BHollenegg



Mr. Hollenegg --

Thanks for taking the time to respond.

Unfortunately, you and I know your underlined statement above is not accurate (according to AH's update). Many other Shareholders know the same.

I'm not sure why this is such a secret -- why are you trying to misrepresent Mr. Hodges' update? More spook double speak, I guess...

Well -- let's see what the week brings... will there be a POTUS announcement of the "new republic"?


Reply:

TFV...you need to go back and read the plaintiff update again and not twist what was in it. Attorney Hodges is not holding back the release of the CMKX Distribution Funds for Mr. Cottrell or any other reason. Attorney Hodges does not control the funds or the release stipulations. Another entity is in control of the release and the funds. The stipulations state all trust funds have to be ready and fully funded before any of the funds can be released.

Over the past year, Attorney Hodges tried to get the CMKX Funds away from the stipulations of the WGS Fund. After several attempts, Attorney Hodges took the route of taking care of the legal aspects of the other funds so "All" of the funds will be ready. Attorney Hodges has fought every step of the way to get the release done asap.

Cottrell Funds are part of the WGS Funds and falls under the stipulations. If Cottrell has problems with his funds so does every Trusts. If CMKX has trouble with its funds, so does the other funds... it will affect Cottrell's Funds, vice versa. This is because of the stipulation of the WGS Funds. There was a problem with the banks transfer timing, but was resolved. When Attorney Hodges receives notification that all trusts are ready, which includes Cottrel's Trust, he will receive notification that the Trusts are ready. When this happens then ER is provided. Attorney Hodges has repeatedly stated, he will notify the Shareholders when he receives verification that ER is received.

ER (permission) is received when "all" accounts are ready for distribution. There are several processes which takes place in the distribution. Funds are moved to different staging areas to cover the various areas. Packages are shipped to various distribution centers ready for distribution. Once everything is in place, ER is obtained and the releases are completed at the same time. These steps are taken to ensure all recipients receive their part of the distributions.

Reread the plaintiff's update after reading my explanation and tell us what part says Attorney Hodges is holding back the funds..

When you post statements like this without showing proof and making negative jabs
"-- why are you trying to misrepresent Mr. Hodges' update? More spook double speak, I guess..."

...you are not getting the true facts out , you are distorting the facts.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

****************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #13 Today at 6:43pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 6:13pm, funado wrote:I'm speaking from a bit of a disadvantage here because I haven't seen the AH update that everyone's in such an uproar about, but I do have a question.

Right now, IMO, there's a group of people who seem to be doing everything they can to discredit Al and his work. There are the where's-my-money whiners , the Al's-cheating-us complainers, and the more common variety of doomers and gloomers. Taken together, they are, again IMO, a small but vocal brigade that aims to cast suspicion and doubt about what Al is doing for us. And this necessarily entails casting doubt about Robert for his continued support of Al, and anyone else who wants Al to keep working toward getting us our ROI.

OK, so I can follow things this far: We haven't been paid in spite of Al's continued efforts and despite the fact that he hoped we'd be paid by Christmas. And there seems to be some muddying of the waters because of some update that went to the plaintiffs and is being construed as having Al put Michael Cottrell's interests before ours, even though Al has already taken the trouble to deny this emphatically. Like I say, I haven't had the privilege of seeing that update, so I'm just guessing on that part.

What I don't get, though, and I've asked this question before but never got an answer, is -- What are these people suggesting that we replace Al with? Let's say for the sake of argument that these people succeed in discrediting and discouraging Al to the point where he says, "I've had enough of this. I can no longer help people who spend all their time casting suspicion and doubt on me. I'm finished." OK, so Al stops working for us. Is that "Mission Accomplished?"

In such a scenario, after Al leaves in despair, who's going to take up the battle? Will it be one of the where's-my-money whiners or the Al's-cheating-us complainers? And what's the strategy going to be? Are you planning to replace all of the contacts inside and outside government that Al has worked so long and so hard to establish? Is one of you going to give us your name, address, and phone number so we can contact you 24/7 to get information whenever we're feeling down and insecure? Are you going to hire a lawyer to replace Al? Are you planning to finance such a move?

Are you going to be ready to combat the new group of complainers and whiners who inevitably don't agree with the way you're handling matters, and who work endlessly to discredit you?

And, most importantly, what is the precise date on which we can expect our money? I mean, after hounding Al for so long about the dates that he was working toward, I'm assuming that one of your main jobs -- this new group that's going to replace Al -- will have to be that of determining an exact date and making sure that, no matter what, everyone gets paid on that date.

Perhaps you could add that date to the personal contact information mentioned above. Oh, and be sure to have the phone lines open all day long because there are many people in other time zones that'll need their hands held.

I've pretty much come to understand all of the complaints and suspicions of this noble group, but I must have missed all of the posts that tell us what's going to happen after you've driven Al away. If you could provide some links, that'd help.

Looking forward to your efforts in getting us paid. Say, next week perhaps?

TIA,
Funado


Reply:

Thank you Funado...well stated...very much appreciated,
BHollenegg

************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #12 Today at 7:12pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 6:58pm, akoller84 wrote:Just a quick cap question Bob, When you stated "There was a problem with the banks transfer timing, but was resolved." Was that the most recent issue hindering Attorney Hodges hunch that we would most likely receive ER before Christmas? If so, it would make sense that he did not foresee such an issue with all the larger problems that have arose for us/him.

Thanks in advance for a response, and thank you for being so active in your updates/responses during the holiday weekend. I hope you had a relaxing Christmas with loved ones.


Reply:

Thank you Akoller...the bank problem occurred Monday when funds transferred to West Coast Bank did not make it in time for the release. The funds showed up later in the account at 5 pm PST. That was in the last update on 23 Dec. Yes, this would be an unforeseen problem. The distribution was planned for Tuesday and Wednesday. I have not received an update.

Thank you Akoller,
BHollenegg

************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #11 Today at 7:45pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 7:02pm, taskforceviking wrote:
Today at 6:31pm, bhollenegg wrote:


TFV...you need to go back and read the plaintiff update again and not twist what was in it. Attorney Hodges is not holding back the release of the CMKX Distribution Funds for Mr. Cottrell or any other reason. Attorney Hodges does not control the funds or the release stipulations. Another entity is in control of the release and the funds. The stipulations state all trust funds have to be ready and fully funded before any of the funds can be released.

Over the past year, Attorney Hodges tried to get the CMKX Funds away from the stipulations of the WGS Fund. After several attempts, Attorney Hodges took the route of taking care of the legal aspects of the other funds so "All" of the funds will be ready. Attorney Hodges has fought every step of the way to get the release done asap.

Cottrell Funds are part of the WGS Funds and falls under the stipulations. If Cottrell has problems with his funds so does every Trusts. If CMKX has trouble with its funds, so does the other funds... it will affect Cottrell's Funds, vice versa. This is because of the stipulation of the WGS Funds. There was a problem with the banks transfer timing, but was resolved. When Attorney Hodges receives notification that all trusts are ready, which includes Cottrel's Trust, he will receive notification that the Trusts are ready. When this happens then ER is provided. Attorney Hodges has repeatedly stated, he will notify the Shareholders when he receives verification that ER is received.

ER (permission) is received when "all" accounts are ready for distribution. There are several processes which takes place in the distribution. Funds are moved to different staging areas to cover the various areas. Packages are shipped to various distribution centers ready for distribution. Once everything is in place, ER is obtained and the releases are completed at the same time. These steps are taken to ensure all recipients receive their part of the distributions.

Reread the plaintiff's update after reading my explanation and tell us what part says Attorney Hodges is holding back the funds..

When you post statements like this without showing proof and making negative jabs
"-- why are you trying to misrepresent Mr. Hodges' update? More spook double speak, I guess..."

...you are not getting the true facts out , you are distorting the facts.

Thank you,
BHollenegg





Mr. Hollenegg --

Thank you for finally acknowledging that our distribution is clearly tied to Mr. Cottrell's receipt of funds... and that Mr. Cottrell's receipt is pivotal.

Appreciate the encouragement, but I can read quite well:

When I have received a copy of the ‘tear sheet’ from MC’s distribution, we will have ER, and I will so announce – first to you all and then the boards.

My concern (as a very valid shareholder and not a basher) is the credibility of the letters sent to Her Majesty the Queen stating that MC will be in charge of a $6.2 Trillion Dollar Re-Funding Project -- IMHO, this is beyond the pale of reality. As I have stated previously, such a tremendous sum would be on par with the GDP of Brazil, Italy, and the UK combined; or more than the GDP of China; or 42% of the GDP of the US.

Understandably, I cannot prove whether MC will play such an important role on the Global Financial Stage or not -- however, I do think it is important for Shareholders to understand the magnitude of such an assertion and how our payment is tied to Mr. Cottrell.

We wait.


Reply:

TFV...Again, you are not showing where Attorney Hodges is holding back the CMKX Fund. That is what you were on about. I explained the stipulation which ties all the funds together for release. When Al receives notification (tear sheet) then he has been notified the funds of All the trust are in place. Those who are in control of the release will have ER and release the funds, not Al. The ER and its connection to the WGS fund is explained in the updates from Attorney Hodges to the Shareholders.

I am not going to sidetrack to the Queen, Cottrell, or who ever else is in the WGS with 'what if' scenarios...it is not an issue with our distribution. Where does it state that Attorney Hodges is holding back the funds?

Thank you,
BHollenegg

*****************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #10 Today at 8:00pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 7:53pm, mgpaul wrote:Bob your statement

"Those who are in control of the release will have ER and release the funds, not Al".

In your opinion who is in contol of the release? TIA


Reply:

I don't have an opinion on that.

Thank you MGPaul,
BHollenegg

*********************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #9 Today at 8:07pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 7:54pm, dicek18 wrote:Michael Cottrell - a single individual - is expecting to receive $6.2 trillion for his Dollar Re-funding Project?

And CMKX Shareholders - who already have a funded trust - must wait for MC to receive his $6.2 trillion before we receive our money which is legally due to us?

They could have stipulated that pigs must fly before the CMKX trust is released, but they wanted to clean that up a little, so they decided that a Mr. Michael Cottrell - a single individual - must receive his $6.2 trillion before the CMKX trust is released. There, doesn't that sound better? One shouldn't show ingratitude.

There's nothing quite like having the sentence of infinity added on to one's long and painfully drawn out 6 year wait.

Here's hoping that the Supreme Court Directive will disengage our trust from the World Global BS and that we'll be paid by Dec 31.

Otherwise, realize that things have been set up in order to make certain that our payout becomes an impossibility.

Because there's simply no way that a nonentity such as Mr. Michael Cottrell is going to be handed $6.2 Trillion for his nebulous - and to date - never before explained Dollar Re-funding Project.

There's just no way that will happen - and it was designed that way.


Reply:

How is that? Why are the first payment packages being distributed?

**********************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #8 Today at 8:38pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 8:01pm, crackerjack wrote:I thought per a pm Robert that when Attorney Hodges went to VA. He completed the funding of all the trusts??

I tried to pm you in regards to this info but no response so I took it to the boards but I figured the funding for us, cottrell or who ever else was fixed in VA via the transfer of funds.

Thanks


Reply:

Crackerjack,

We are referring to the funds transferred to the West Coast, which did not make it in time for the distribution. Once the payouts are verified and in place for the distribution, then the release of the funds. The last update 23 Dec it was scheduled for Tuesday-Wednesday.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

**********************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #7 Today at 8:49pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 8:12pm, crackerjack wrote:But back in nov I was told by Robert that all the trusts were funded that needed to be funded so I'm at a loss now wondering why cottrels trust would be an issue. Funding of the wgs trusts took place when Hodges was in VA. Robert you said u were on the phone with Hodges when it occured?

Glta
I hope this is a distrbution of trust fund $$ problem
since I was told that all the trusts had been funded (all)
glta



Reply:

Crackerjack...if you are going to put out my information please get it right. I was on the phone with Al when the CMKX funds were transferred to the trustee in April.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

********************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #6 Today at 8:58pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 8:06pm, sokr61 wrote:
Today at 7:12pm, bhollenegg wrote:


Thank you Akoller...the bank problem occurred Monday when funds transferred to West Coast Bank did not make it in time for the release. The funds showed up later in the account at 5 pm PST. That was in the last update on 23 Dec. Yes, this would be an unforeseen problem. The distribution was planned for Tuesday and Wednesday. I have not received an update.

Thank you Akoller,
BHollenegg




Hi Bob,

Quick clarification please?

It sounds as though if the funds would have made it on time Monday 12/20, we would have seen distribution Tues/Weds. When you say funds showed up later at 5pm, what day was it you refer to? I could interpret it a couple ways, such as:

1) 5pm Monday, but the Tues/Weds distribution was canceled due to a time line not met. If so, why no distribution on Weds/Thur or Thur/Fri?

2) 5pm on 12/23, but not enough time to distribute prior to Christmas

Finally, if the funds have shown up, is there a current distribution plan time frame...this could be one you know of, or simply in your opinion.


Thanks for all you do...



Reply:

Please understand why I cannot put out opinions ... by the time it circulates it somehow transforms to fact.

Monday 5 PM PST.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

******************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #5 Today at 9:09pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 8:10pm, dicek18 wrote:
Today at 8:07pm, bhollenegg wrote:

How is that? Why are the first payment packages being distributed?



Can you please explain this?

When were they distributed - what day? How much were the payments?

What service (UPS/FedEx) is delivering them?

Thank you!


Reply:

Please read what I posted. The information I know I posted. I am having a problem keeping up with the questions and typing. I do not know all the intricate details, just what I receive in the updates.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

**************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #4 Today at 9:14pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 8:52pm, ziggy wrote:Hi bob, could you answer a question for me, I've read a lot about the trustee being a secret, why is that?


Reply:

Security

*************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #3 Today at 9:19pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 8:56pm, truerword wrote:Bob,
However, in the update, Hodges said when he got the receipt of payment for cottrell.. he would then
announce our ER.. So.. not sure how you can say it has no connection.


Reply:

Truerword...please read the thread to what was actually said and what was the issue.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

***********************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #2 Today at 9:22pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 8:56pm, crajaraman wrote:Hi Bob

Thanks for being active on the board on a holiday ..I was wondering why the distribution was not done on Thursday or Friday..

Also, can you explain if you can why the funds need to be transferred ?

Are they capitalising the banks around the world to "clear" our checks or check cards ?

I am a bit confused how this would work..

I guess a shareholder can have an account in any bank and deposit the funds anywhere ..how does the trustee select which banks to transfer funds to ? Thanks..

cr


Reply:

CR...the package will explain...I do not have the answers.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

****************************

Re: IMO: 1/1/11
« Result #1 Today at 9:28pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 9:06pm, eggcream wrote:
Today at 8:58pm, bhollenegg wrote:


Please understand why I cannot put out opinions ... by the time it circulates it somehow transforms to fact.

Monday 5 PM PST.

Thank you,
BHollenegg




Bob...first thank you for sharing this information with us but I take issue with your statement...so perhaps you can clarify a few things that are out of my grasp...

If the cause of the delay was the late arrival of funds on Monday Dec 20...then I will assume everything was prepared to go....for Tuesday...Wednesday...so if everything was ready to go why couldn't the release have been approved for Thursday or Friday...I would assume if all was prepared that would not be an issue....

I would also assume that if the release was scheduled for Monday that the Cottrell trust is not an issue.....If that is the case I would see no reason that the release of the funds should not be delayed one more day and will be released on Monday....

Looking forward to hearing your reply....


Reply:

I posted what I know from the updates I received. The last update was 23 Dec.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

************************

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg

[sandi66]

December 28, 2010

Re: West Coast Banks Main office located at
« Reply #11 Today at 9:33am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The bank is "a" west coast bank, not The West Coast Bank. Sorry about the confusion. I left off the 'a' when I posted the response to Akoller's question.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

*************************

Re: West Coast Banks Main office located at
« Reply #18 Today at 10:15am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 9:48am, cao wrote:Hey Robert, I've been thinking about your clarification that it is not the West Coast Bank. I don't want to be a jerk, but why did you capitalize West Coast then? If I were saying a bank on the west coast, I would type just like that with no caps.

Am I off base or are you trying to throw us off base? Thanks Robert!


Reply:

No you are not off base and no I was not trying to throw anyone off base. I was answering several messages. I was going from time zones, which I capitalized to the West Coast bank...I capitalized bank by mistake. West Coast should have been capitalized because it is a region.
My apologies to all.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

***************************

Re: West Coast Banks Main office located at
« Reply #20 Today at 10:25am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 9:36am, cao wrote:Hi Robert...thanks for the clarification. Can you clarify our most current payment status? As you can probably tell, restlessness is very, very high right now. Thank you Robert.

CAO




CAO...I am anticipating an announcement from Al. I am waiting for an update. My last update was 12/23.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=36174&page=2#507896

[travelbugaz]

Re: gossip 12/29/10
« Reply #3 Today at 7:00am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The last update I received from Attorney Hodges was the 12/23 Update. The last time Attorney Hodges did not answer my emails he was on silence mode. I understand the shareholders want to know all the details. I have provided what I can without compromising the progress made, as well as, the safety of the individuals involved in releasing the funds.

Attorney Hodges has a considerable amount of responsibility on his shoulders. Attorney Hodges is determined to see this to the end and to the optimum results for the shareholders. Attorney Hodges is in this to win. Informing the opponents of what you are going to accomplish is fine, but informing the opponents how by providing information which will give the opponents strategic advantage is not the way to win. The final win is when the shareholders are in possession of all their CMKX Funds.

At what cost are the shareholders willing to take to make the strategic information public before receiving the funds? Does it make sense to contact the opponents and provide details of information acquired by Attorney Hodges, file a report with the police against Attorney Hodges because he will not make public strategic-confidential information, to harass and threatened the ones who are working to release the funds, and then demand results by a certain date?

When the XXX is involved, this is serious stuff..he does not play games when it comes to security issues. The XXX's priority is national security. We are part of a huge settlement. Other governments are involved. The XXX feels there are security issues, then he will do his job and will not give permission until he takes care of it. The XXX will not be forced by shareholders to make a decision. I will continue to support those who are actually making progress and focused on releasing the funds to the shareholders. I will wait until Attorney Hodges is allowed or ready to communicate with the shareholders.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

tramp2.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=15428&page=1#97599

[sandi66]

December 29, 2010

Re: IMO: I have to say this ....
« Result #11 Today at 7:18am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The last update I received from Attorney Hodges was the 12/23 Update. The last time Attorney Hodges did not answer my emails he was on silence mode. I understand the shareholders want to know all the details. I have provided what I can without compromising the progress made, as well as, the safety of the individuals involved in releasing the funds.

Attorney Hodges has a considerable amount of responsibility on his shoulders. Attorney Hodges is determined to see this to the end and to the optimum results for the shareholders. Attorney Hodges is in this to win. Informing the opponents of what you are going to accomplish is fine, but informing the opponents how by providing information which will give the opponents strategic advantage is not the way to win. The final win is when the shareholders are in possession of all their CMKX Funds.

At what cost are the shareholders willing to take to make the strategic information public before receiving the funds? Does it make sense to contact the opponents and provide details of information acquired by Attorney Hodges, file a report with the police against Attorney Hodges because he will not make public strategic-confidential information, to harass and threatened the ones who are working to release the funds, and then demand results by a certain date?

When the XXX is involved, this is serious stuff..he does not play games when it comes to security issues. The XXX's priority is national security. We are part of a huge settlement. Other governments are involved. The XXX feels there are security issues, then he will do his job and will not give permission until he takes care of it. The XXX will not be forced by shareholders to make a decision. I will continue to support those who are actually making progress and focused on releasing the funds to the shareholders. I will wait until Attorney Hodges is allowed or ready to communicate with the shareholders.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg

****************************

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/27
« Result #10 Today at 7:34am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The last update I received from Attorney Hodges was the 12/23 Update. The last time Attorney Hodges did not answer my emails he was on silence mode. I understand the shareholders want to know all the details. I have provided what I can without compromising the progress made, as well as, the safety of the individuals involved in releasing the funds.

Attorney Hodges has a considerable amount of responsibility on his shoulders. Attorney Hodges is determined to see this to the end and to the optimum results for the shareholders. Attorney Hodges is in this to win. Informing the opponents of what you are going to accomplish is fine, but informing the opponents how by providing information which will give the opponents strategic advantage is not the way to win. The final win is when the shareholders are in possession of all their CMKX Funds.

At what cost are the shareholders willing to take to make the strategic information public before receiving the funds? Does it make sense to contact the opponents and provide details of information acquired by Attorney Hodges, file a report with the police against Attorney Hodges because he will not make public strategic-confidential information, to harass and threatened the ones who are working to release the funds, and then demand results by a certain date?

When the XXX is involved, this is serious stuff..he does not play games when it comes to security issues. The XXX's priority is national security. We are part of a huge settlement. Other governments are involved. The XXX feels there are security issues, then he will do his job and will not give permission until he takes care of it. The XXX will not be forced by shareholders to make a decision. I will continue to support those who are actually making progress and focused on releasing the funds to the shareholders. I will wait until Attorney Hodges is allowed or ready to communicate with the shareholders.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

*********************

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/27
« Result #9 Today at 8:48am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 8:34am, jbgood wrote:Bob & Chucky

Word on the street is that we are to get 80 cents "damages for with-holding our funds" in the packets. Will you guys try to find out from your sources WHY "these funds" are not distributed now. I see no reason for all funds to be with-held while the T's are being crossed, Cottrell is being funded, logistics are put in place, etc, etc, etc. The 80 cents is not part of the original trusts that were put in place, so why not distribute them and give the shareholders a bit of security as well? I understand there is caution to be taken with public information, so why not just send it out without any notification at all?

The shareholders deserve better than this, much more. This is a two way street.

Thanks guys...

Mike

Reply:

Hello Mike...I have not seen any information that confirms the first payment is for damages for "withholding the funds." Again, Attorney Hodges is not in charge of the release. Attorney Hodges is ensuring the release is made by using every legal means available.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

**********************

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/27
« Result #8 Today at 9:46am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 8:46am, smegadild wrote:Bob, if the DOJ signed off on this, then why would the opponents stand in the way to muck this up however they would muck it up and not understand they do so at their own peril. It isn't as though the opponents are not a known entity to the DOJ? Why would they want the full weight of the DOJ coming down on them when in the end let's be honest here, the opponents know they would be summarily spanked? Something isn't meshing here with the message your conveying. Not asking you to convey or assuage too me my concerns. It's supposed to be towards the end of the saga so we've been led to believe unless this is a prelude to conditioning us to an extension. I'm certain you've seen the heart-wrenching stories by a couple fellow shareholders in the past few days and it seems to be reaching a crescendo with so many. How much more can this shareholder base be wrung out? Again, not dumping on you by any means, this is all just tough to watch. I sense a bad moon a rising.

Bob if you could give an opinion on something...

The sale of the claims to the Chinese, why couldn't that money be disbursed to the rightful owners being the shareholders? I never quite got that?





Today at 7:34am, bhollenegg wrote:
The last update I received from Attorney Hodges was the 12/23 Update. The last time Attorney Hodges did not answer my emails he was on silence mode. I understand the shareholders want to know all the details. I have provided what I can without compromising the progress made, as well as, the safety of the individuals involved in releasing the funds.

Attorney Hodges has a considerable amount of responsibility on his shoulders. Attorney Hodges is determined to see this to the end and to the optimum results for the shareholders. Attorney Hodges is in this to win. Informing the opponents of what you are going to accomplish is fine, but informing the opponents how by providing information which will give the opponents strategic advantage is not the way to win. The final win is when the shareholders are in possession of all their CMKX Funds.

At what cost are the shareholders willing to take to make the strategic information public before receiving the funds? Does it make sense to contact the opponents and provide details of information acquired by Attorney Hodges, file a report with the police against Attorney Hodges because he will not make public strategic-confidential information, to harass and threatened the ones who are working to release the funds, and then demand results by a certain date?

When the XXX is involved, this is serious stuff..he does not play games when it comes to security issues. The XXX's priority is national security. We are part of a huge settlement. Other governments are involved. The XXX feels there are security issues, then he will do his job and will not give permission until he takes care of it. The XXX will not be forced by shareholders to make a decision. I will continue to support those who are actually making progress and focused on releasing the funds to the shareholders. I will wait until Attorney Hodges is allowed or ready to communicate with the shareholders.


Thank you,
BHollenegg



Reply:

Smegadild....Please understand, I cannot provide opinions because it will later be misconstrued as fact and from Attorney Hodges. Attorney Hodges is getting all funds released that are identified for the CMKX Shareholders. The plight of the shareholders is the driving force to get the release done as quickly as possible.

My best to you Smegadild,
BHollenegg

*************************

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/27
« Result #7 Today at 11:39am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 10:13am, bobneuhart wrote:

yesterday some poster said they called to find out about a SC directive and they were told a directive didnt exist...


Reply:

From the Supreme Court call thread....

Wolfbela...."There are no secret documents issued, as per office"

This would explain why you weren't provided any secret documents.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/inde....ead=7855&page=3

**********************

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/27
« Result #6 Today at 2:37pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 1:33pm, ssu wrote:
Today at 12:10pm, golden1101 wrote:I thought there was no longer an "enemy" standing in the way and that payment was now merely a matter of logistics?

Now we cannot disclose anything because the enemy will know how we are going to accomplish our tactical agenda?




Exactly Golden.............. makes you wounder


Reply:

There is more than one payment. What happens to one payment may not happen to the next payment. The information that could create problems are Trustees threatened, individuals involved threatened, shareholders threatened, bogus authorities contacting shareholders requesting personal information...there is more. Until you have all the funds in your possession, anything can happen.

Would you post your bank details, how much money you have, where your money is located, how to access your funds on a public forum?

Thank you,
BHollenegg

**********************

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/27
« Result #4 Today at 3:38pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 2:45pm, hurtsogood wrote:Bob, Do you still feel this way or are we back to fluid. Not faulting you, just curious as to what you think at this time.



1) If you are still here in January, then you are not a shareholder .

2) If you think I lied to the Shareholders, then you deserve to be here in January, not with the shareholders.

3) Chucky's source is the Listener who has a high-level source who is not connected to Tyler...


(that is 3 things.....sound like Johnny Bravo now)

BHollenegg

Reply:

There is more to the post than just the three statements. They were taken out of context. I will explain each one as they related to the post I was responding to.

1. When I made this statement, the distribution was scheduled before December 6th...evidently there are two slips here...the date and the tongue....my apology.

2. My response to the name calling in the message.

3. Chucky's has the same excellent source.


I will not repeat this post as many times as you repeated the question.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

*******************

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/27
« Result #3 Today at 3:49pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 3:31pm, hurtsogood wrote:If Bob is looking into seeing if we could get the trust posted for shareholders to view at transferonline you could conclude with a little deductive reasoning we will probably see no payment this year.

Hurt


Reply:

Wrong in your deduction...you took this out of context. A shareholder asked if this could be done as a way to see the trust details and payment information. I thought it was a great way to view the trust details and responded that I would look into it.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

****************

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/27
« Result #2 Today at 3:56pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 2:38pm, buffet1 wrote:Bob,

I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to see if its possible for you to request an update from Al, instead of you waiting for him to email you? You are in the position of plaintiff, and maybe you can get some new development updates from Al. Just thinking out loud! Lol.

Also, do you think we will get a shareholders courtesy update (not that Al owes us one) if december 31 comes and goes without ER?

Thank you Bob for your time/effort in keeping us informed,

Buffet


Reply:

Buffet...Attorney Hodges will make an announcement when we receive ER. Let's give this a couple of days.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

***********************

Re: The Buzz Chat 12/27
« Result #1 Today at 4:06pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 3:55pm, prestonat wrote:Bob looking into "seeing" the actual trust account on Transfer Online leads me to believe we will not be seeing anything for a while-if our next date via Chucky was Dec. 31st...Why would you look into viewing the trust if the trust was to be released in a couple of days?

Reply:

There will be more than one payment. The payments are at different intervals. If there are any changes or extra information to add, then shareholders can access the information via their Transfer Online account.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

***********************

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg

[sandi66]

December 29, 2010

Re: Al Hodges WHY???
« Reply #21 Today at 11:15am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 7:42am, e362 wrote:Bhollenegg, I respect your call for level headed thinking, but I think it is human nature to be at wits end at this point. When Christmas came and went without money in hand and AH didn't even give a reassuring message through one of the plaintiffs I think it turned up the we've been played emotion to the breaking point. His SC court directive for the end of this year is 2 business days away and if that passes it will be pretty cut and dry we have been lied to. The fact that he has not updated you in 5 days of which included the infamous Christmas prediction should be very alarming to you as you are a plaintiff in his suit. "Silent mode" as you called it from an atty to his plaintiff is unacceptable and unprofessional, silent mode from you to us is understandable should the situation require.
As for "At what cost are the shareholders willing to take to make the strategic information public before receiving the funds?" Here is something I think all stuckholders could accept and benefit from that wouldn't risk a thing. Obviously AH or transfer online etc has the name and cert #'s of all the bonafides. Have transfer online set up a copy of the trust agreement on there site only accessable by entering the correct name and cert number for bonafides to view. They can remove any names they feel would jeopardize a person or this suits safety. Obviously the opposition is well aware of the trust so they would gather nothing new and it would calm alot of stuckholders fears that they have been played all along. GLTUA and thank you.


Reply:

E362...you brought up several good points. Attorney Hodges did provide the plaintiffs updates. He requested the plaintiffs not to post the update due to sensitive information which cannot be made public. A shareholder posted a copy of the update he received from a plaintiff. The individuals named in the update were called several times and harassed about Attorney Hodges. This happened before and compromised Attorney Hodges position. I can understand why Attorney Hodges is concerned about sharing sensitive information with the plaintiffs

The Trust idea sounds great and may be an acceptable way to review the information. I will check into this.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7854&page=2#106024

[sandi66]

December 30, 2010

Re: Other gossip,etc. Dec26-->
« Reply #201 Today at 8:18am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 6:18am, uraniumprincess wrote:
Yesterday at 8:41pm, Vinny wrote:

Not accurate in what sense? He said it...



I think Bob is saying that he didn't say there would be more than one payment from the Trust, but that there is more than one (Trust) and or Payment coming as to why he would look in to viewing details on Transfer Online.

Hope this helps

UP



Reply:

The Transfer Online to view the trust details and payment details was a suggestion by E362 on PB29. The message was brought over to Millionaires and was attributed to BHollenegg stating this. Then a question was asked why consider the Transfer Online when the shareholders are going to receive the payment in the package? My response was taken out of context in respect to the Transfer Online part ...which was a suggestion being discussed.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

********

Re: Other gossip,etc. Dec26-->
« Reply #203 Today at 8:35am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 8:20am, john3339 wrote:
Today at 8:18am, bhollenegg wrote:

The Transfer Online to view the trust details and payment details was a suggestion by E362 on PB29. The message was brought over to Millionaires and was attributed to BHollenegg stating this. Then a question was asked why consider the Transfer Online when the shareholders are going to receive the payment in the package? My response was taken out of context in respect to the Transfer Online part ...which was a suggetion.

Thank you,
BHollenegg



Good Morning Robert! (or afternoon)

Hope all is well with you!
john



Reply:

Thank you John...waiting for all is well to change to all is well done.

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=36134&page=11#509206

[sandi66]

December 30, 2010

Re: what is Al's obligation to the plaintiffs
« Reply #6 Today at 5:37pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 2:42pm, gusjarvis wrote:Legally, they have the right to:

1) Receive information of any settlement

2) Receive evidence

-- Both of which, to my understanding, they have received none.

RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT (California Bar)

rules.calbar.ca.gov/Rules/RulesofProfessionalConduct.aspx

rules.calbar.ca.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=8qtNkWP-Kjw%3d&tabid=1233

Rule 3-510 Communication of Settlement Offer

(A) A member shall promptly communicate to the member's client:

(1) All terms and conditions of any offer made to the client in a criminal matter; and

(2) All amounts, terms, and conditions of any written offer of settlement made to the client in all other matters.

(B) As used in this rule, "client" includes a person who possesses the authority to accept an offer of settlement or plea, or, in a class action, all the named representatives of the class.

Rule 5-220 Suppression of Evidence

A member shall not suppress any evidence that the member or the member's client has a legal obligation to reveal or to produce.


Reply:

Gus...Attorney Hodges has done an excellent job and because of his dedication, knowledge, and experience, CMKX Shareholders all over the World will be blessed greatly, including you. It is time for appreciation and celebration. Enjoy your new status.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7878&page=1#106488

**************

Re: T'was the night before New Years
« Reply #10 Yesterday at 6:25pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 4:12pm, wolfbela wrote:I have finally lost it... No Mas...
See you on the other side...

J WB

'Twas the night before New Year's, when all through the house
Not a transfer was flowing, of any amount..
The Hodglings were gathered in Pasadena fair..
with Seeking still tubbin,"the money, it's there".

The shareholders snuggled on boards as they read,
While visions of millions danced in their head
And then on the Proboards there arose such a clatter,
News from AL Hodges could be the matter.

"Now, Pongo! now,Wyatt! now, Sheila and Treffey!
Please give us more than we know here already.
To the top of the porch! to the top of the wall!
Not another world event to give us a stall!"

And then, in a twinkling, I heard on the roof
The packages arrived while still in my youth
As I drew in my hand, and was turning around,
Down the chimney Bob H came with a bound.

A bundle of checks he had flung on his back,
not able to share yet, it wouldn't be right.
But I heard him exclaim, as he posted away,
Attorney Hodges will update the shareholders of ER!!!



Reply:

And as I looked around at the Shareholders' delight,
It was one of the most magnificent sight.
And when I saw Wolfbela was not uptight,
It was then I knew all was finally right.
I wish you all a pleasant night,
Time for me to turn out the light.

All the best,
BHollenegg

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7879&page=1#106534

[sandi66]

December 31, 2010

Re: Other gossip,etc. Dec26-->
« Reply #234 Today at 6:12am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 1:27am, skibuff wrote:Bob H thankyou for all your post! I really like them!


Reply:

Thank you Skibuff. I appreciate you taking the time to read the messages and your comments. May Wealth and Health be you and your family.

All the best,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=36134&page=12#510308

[sandi66]

Re: Other gossip,etc. Dec26-->
« Reply #269 Today at 9:20am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yesterday at 8:53am, jbgood wrote:
Yesterday at 8:35am, bhollenegg wrote:



Thank you John...waiting for all is well to change to all is well done.



Good morning Bob & John...

Hey Bob, do we need to get Al a big stick like the guy in Walking Tall? Maybe we didn't ask for permission in the right way?





Just kidding... Have a good one!




Reply:

The "Big Stick" is already taken care of...

A lot of thought went into this already...

We are prepared and have several options.....

Because of the experiences we had with the government not sticking to the agreed schedule...

Attorney Hodges filed an appeal to ensure that all payment packages are delivered.

The message is clear "no problems , no appeal".

None of this approach...

While we are waiting....

Ignore those who are negative and seeking attention

Be aware of fake BHollenegg Posts....ask for the link to the original post...

Listen carefully to the information being provided by different sources...

Please don't take your frustrations out on the messengers...

Enjoy the wealth...



All the best,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=36134&page=14#510408

[sandi66]

January 1, 2010

Today at 3:16am, zerftony wrote:Bob "happy new year"..... glad to see you on the board
can you give us your latest on the packets.....?
Thanks


Reply:

Thank you Zerftony. I have not received an update from Attorney Hodges. Please give the delivery a few more work days...let's see what happens. What we receive should outweigh the wait.


Happy New Year,
BHollenegg

**************************

Re: My take on bob's post
« Result #1 Today at 11:56am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow! Sorry that you had to ask several times for answers. I have company staying with me over the holidays. I stayed up all night to answer emails and message posts while they slept. I was answering this thread going from page 1 to page 2. I tried to get as much in before stopping for lunch with my company. I logged back in (BikiniPro can verify this). I opened this thread to see the last message I responded to. I just saw and read all your messages. I wasn't avoiding your questions. They are justified and your concerns are valid. I have a request if the Admin and the Mods would please consider. Emotions are understandably high. If anyone received a vacation because of their reaction would you please reinstate them.

The last update relating to the distributions I received from Attorney Hodges was Dec 30, 2010. The update was the appeal information, which I posted earlier. I misread the part explaining the filing of the appeal. I corrected this earlier and extended my apologies. The appeal will be filed if there are problems with the future payments, including this payment package. The first payment package should be forthcoming.

I have not received a confirmation on the information I sent to Attorney Hodges. In the past, Attorney Hodges responded in a timely manner the information I sent in for verification. The only time I did not receive any responses was during a 10 day quiet period after the election week. The information from Chucky's source during this time was impeccable and verified correct two weeks later when I received the Plaintiff's update.

I know Lt KK and his sources' connections. I know Chucky and his source's connection. Their sources have the attention and respect of those who are involved.

From all the information available to me, I feel very confident that the first payment packages are en route, if not, will be shortly. The amounts are huge, well deserved, and life changing.

I understand the disappointment of not receiving the first payment package before Christmas or the end or the year. The Shareholders deserve the optimum. This is huge in every aspect. Let's give this a few more working days. This is a time for us to stay focused on what we are about to receive. The stress level is high enough without adding to it. Please, let's keep the threats, bravado, and personal attacks at a minimum for the sake of all the Shareholders.

To all shareholders and their families a Happy, Healthy, and Wealthy New Year.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

********



millionaires.proboards.com/index.....user=bhollenegg


ty subtle

[sandi66]

January 2, 2010

Fake BHollenegg Warning
« Result #1 Today at 7:32am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a bogus BHollenegg Facebook Account putting out information.

Information stating from BHollenegg should have a link to my original posts on Proboards... if not, then please disregard the information and treat as bogus information.


Bogus BHollenegg account...
www.facebook.com/permalink.php?st....124823157559933

Thank you,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg

and

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7901&page=1#107146

******************

Today at 10:06am, wolfbela wrote: Bob,

I hope you are right.. I am trying to control my passion and emotions, but
not having a good time of it today..
I believe any reasonable person can understand that.. My pain is not for
myself, as much as it is for the people that really are in need.
I am blessed in my life.. But I have a place in my heart for people that
are hanging on to their hopes here because of financial and medical problems
that have been burdening them.

That said, I hope a positive end is upon us..

Jerry


Reply:

Jerry...

We all have experienced the emotional burdens of what seems like a
Lifetime in the Stock instead of the Stock of a Lifetime. Any reasonable person
can understand this, but unfortunately not all people are reasonable. When it
involves Trillions of Dollars, reasonable will become unreasonable.

Attorney Hodges had to deal with the unreasonable opponents by using every
legal means available. The legal system is not perfect. Facts, witnesses,
information, experiences, knowledge, time constraints, and emotions are
some of the many variables that can be used to manipulate and affect the final
outcome. Winning is not 'justice' easy scroll to the bench. You must set a
clear and precise goal which is obtainable by legal means. It is
imperative to stay focused on the goal of releasing all of the CMKX Distribution
Funds to the Shareholders, the Rightful Recipients.

Deploying threats of physical harm, violence, bravado, emotional
outbursts, and constant harassment could provide the 'shock and awe', but also could
cause us to lose the 'stock and all' of the rest of the funds, resulting
in The EX-Factor.

Attorney Hodges provided the 'stock and all' the evidence which continues
to ensure All of the rest of the releases to the CMKX Shareholders the CMKX
Distribution Funds, 'the shock and awe', The EXTRA-Factor.

There are some Gives and there are some Takes...

Please,

Give Attorney Hodges the time when required to Take care of any minor
discrepancies that could occur in the future payments.

Take time to Give thanks to Attorney Hodges and the Team, they are
awesome.

Take time to Give thanks to All involved in ensuring the Shareholders stay
informed.

Take a well-deserved break and Give your family the quality time they
deserve...it has been a long journey.


Thank you,
BHollenegg
« Last Edit: Today at 4:20pm by BHollenegg »

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7901&page=1

[misisipiflyer]

We all have experienced the emotional burdens of what seems like a Lifetime in the Stock instead of the Stock of a Lifetime. Any reasonable person can understand this, but unfortunately not all people are reasonable. When it involves Trillions of Dollars, reasonable will become unreasonable.

Attorney Hodges had to deal with the unreasonable opponents by using every legal means available. The legal system is not perfect. Facts, witnesses, information, experiences, knowledge, time constraints, and emotions are some of the many variables that can be used to manipulate and affect the final outcome. Winning is not 'justice' easy scroll to the bench. You must set a clear and precise goal which is obtainable by legal means. It is imperative to stay focused on the goal of releasing all of the CMKX Distribution Funds to the Shareholders, the Rightful Recipients.

Deploying threats of physical harm, violence, bravado, emotional outbursts, and constant harassment could provide the 'shock and awe', but also could cause us to lose the 'stock and all' of the rest of the funds, resulting in The EX-Factor.

Attorney Hodges provided the 'stock and all' the evidence which continues to ensure All of the CMKX Shareholders the rest of the releases of the CMKX Distribution Funds, 'the shock and awe', The EXTRA-Factor.

There are some Gives and there are some Takes...

Please,

Give Attorney Hodges the time when required to Take care of any minor discrepancies that could occur in the future payments.

Take time to Give thanks to Attorney Hodges and the Team, they are awesome.

Take time to Give thanks to All involved in ensuring the Shareholders stay informed.

Take a well-deserved break and Give your family the quality time they deserve...it has been a long journey.


Thank you,
BHollenegg

[subtlerise]

Re: The Buzz Chat 01/03
« Reply #287 Today at 4:41pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My apology to all Shareholders on the recent post about the 2 1/2 cent pps information that I had post under the JFarn thread. I am not advocating anyone to attack, Tyler, JFarn, or any entity. The 2 1/2 cent pps should be treated as a rumor and not fact. Yes, I was informed of this rumor, however, I was wrong for posting this without verifying the information. I have mentioned this several times in past messages that in all my communications with CEO Kevin West, he was very concerned about the Shareholders. I was wrong to insinuate the opposite based on a rumor. We are all looking for answers, but giving rumors credence without verification is not the answers we want or need. It only adds fuel to the rumor mill, something we have fought against. We all should settle down and focus on the payments we are to receive. This is being worked and the delivery will happen. Let's work together against the odds and not against each other. Again, please accept my apology.


Thank you,
BHollenegg
millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=36369&page=15

[sandi66]

January 5, 2010

Re: The Buzz Chat 01/03
« Result #10 Today at 12:43am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 12:11am, gitrichordietrying wrote:Hi Robert....I think you and Al and all the other plaintiffs have a lot of explaining to do

cmkxhottub.proboards.com/index.cg....play&thread=193


Reply:

Explain what? Why would I explain what you posted here? They are not my letters or my thoughts.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

**************************

Re: The Buzz Chat 01/03
« Result #9 Today at 1:21am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 12:50am, gitrichordietrying wrote:no...but they describe some of your actions


Reply:

My actions speak for itself. Two plaintiffs having a heated confrontation and penning their thoughts does not represent facts but opinions. Allan Treffery was against plaintiffs sharing information with the Shareholders until the release was completed. I feel the Shareholders should know what is transpiring with the release of their funds as long as the information does not jeopardize the release of the funds and the safety of the Shareholders and the ones working the release. The only misinformation was Allan Treffery's poor choice of words and accusations during a heated exchange.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

**********************




Please let Attorney Hodges continue without interruptions, finish working this out...we are almost there, if not there already. Security is tight.

Thank you, BHollenegg

**********************

Re: attention everyone...need to see this
« Result #8 Today at 1:35am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 12:48am, gitrichordietrying wrote:so Greg....you knew that robert and sheila and the other plaintiffs were deliberately feeding misinformation to the general shareholder population....I guess you are more astute than the rest of us...should have brought it to our attention


Reply:

My actions speak for itself. Two plaintiffs having a heated confrontation and penning their thoughts does not represent facts but opinions. Allan Treffery was against plaintiffs sharing information with the Shareholders until the release was completed. I feel the Shareholders should know what is transpiring with the release of their funds as long as the information does not jeopardize the release of the funds and the safety of the Shareholders and the ones working the release. The only misinformation was Allan Treffery's poor choice of words and accusations during a heated exchange.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

**********************

Re: The Buzz Chat 01/03
« Result #7 Today at 1:39am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 1:23am, ChuckWheat wrote:Hey Git,

Apparently it's pretty easy taking swipes at Bob from the safety and comfort afforded by the curtain of anonymity. But I have to ask...what gives you the right to demand anything from him?

Is he responsible for doing something on your behalf, or for the thoughts of other shareholders?

Is he responsible for the way you choose to deal with information presented to you?

What exactly do you think he owes you, anyway?

Bob's identity has been exposed in the public eye, he's received ugly personal communications no shareholder should be subjected to, his health has been compromised several times (and I'm sure the stress of this adventure hasn't helped)...and yet he faithfully comes here to provide any information he can to help other shareholders get through this period. His conduct here has been clearly selfless and costly.

I believe most people here are frustrated on some level, even Bob I'd bet. That doesn't excuse choosing to go on a witch hunt just because your tummy hurts or you didn't get what you believe you're entitled to from him...he's not the person holding up your payments.

My recommendation: Be kind to one other on the boards; hope for the best but be prepared for unexpected events; most of all, keep your eyes on the prize...our fight isn't among each other, it's out there with whatever entities have been messing with us for this last year.

If you need to vent at someone, take it to a PM to me...I can take it, listen if you need to vent, discuss perspectives...whatever. Just leave Bob out of the accusation line-of-fire...he's a better man than most of us will ever aspire to be.

With Respects,
C-Dub


Reply:

Thank you CW...very much appreciated.

BHollenegg

********************

Re: The Buzz Chat 01/03
« Result #6 Today at 2:28am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 2:00am, gitrichordietrying wrote:one2 few...I have no quarrel with you ...I just want to put to rest the argument that Al owes us nothing...Al has vigorously represented to the world that he represents 50,000 shareholders of CMKX (read all his letters and stuff)...and to be fair 50,000 cmkx shareholders have put their faith in him for more than a year...as such...while we may not have a signed retainer....I think his potential obligation is far wider than you may think...and if he were to seek it...compensation in a successful settlement would undoubtedly follow accordingly...he got us to believe in him....as attorney for cmkx shareholders...so yes he does have responsibilities to all of us.

Reply:

Attorney Hodges did take up the responsibilities which will affect all of the Shareholders. Attorney Hodges is paying for it with no charge to you . All you need to do is give appreciation and show support at no cost to you. Attorney Hodges is doing his part ...Are you doing your part?

Thank you
BHollenegg

******************

Re: The Buzz Chat 01/03
« Result #5 Today at 2:47am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 2:28am, smegadild wrote:Then we shouldn't have been named similarly situated. There is an element that believes IBM made Al part of the "plam". We made this happen by complying and pulling our certs. What I don't need is misinfromation and obfuscation. That dog don't hunt anymore. It'll be interesting to see where everyone's mind-set is at the end of Jan. My hats off to them for getting another year out of us. Who do I thank?




Today at 2:15am, one2few wrote:I haven't paid a dime to Al.

So how does Al owe me or the others who have paid nothing?

Appreciate the gifts that have been laid before you.

Recognition of the fact would be a start.



Reply:

Smeg...you and I communicated before by telephone. Do you believe the USAF Officers and I would be part of or condone misinformation to the Shareholders?

Thank you,
BHollenegg

*********************

Re: The Buzz Chat 01/03
« Result #4 Today at 3:19am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 2:37am, golden2011-01 wrote:What is my part exactly?

No offering means "NO SAY" in the outcome. (meaning is, if Al is doing this for no charge, it is considered a "donation" . . . If it is donated to you, you have no right to complain . . . And if you have no right to complain, you have NO SAY in the matter, Right?) Most here have no idea WTF is going on or why . . . So please explain why people should have blind allegiance or faith in those who have, so far, offered none of the remedy that is continually promised, but that always seems to falter . . .
Thank You
Sean

P.S.
(as we approach the 5th of the New Year, without remedy (and more exuses . . . After ALL of "You" were so condident (and dare I say cocky) I feel more compelled to point out that the "absolute" date that was made "so certain" to shareholders, has passed)

I have no problem with fluidity . . . But when one makes the comment (if you are here after the first of the year, you must not be a shareholder) and then again, it does not come true . . . I will call BS on you. (because I have before on this EXACT same issue!!!!!!!)

If it is soooooooooooooooo fluid . . . Don't call a date, Period.



Today at 2:28am, bhollenegg wrote:

Attorney Hodges did take up the responsibilities which will affect all of the Shareholders. Attorney Hodges is paying for it with no charge to you . All you need to do is give appreciation and show support at no cost to you. Attorney Hodges is doing his part ...Are you doing your part?

Thank you
BHollenegg




Reply:

For someone who claims he never reads my messages, you seem to have a lot to contribute when there is someone complaining about my messages. Blind faith?....please read my messages and you won't have that problem.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

***************************

Re: attention everyone...need to see this
« Result #3 Today at 3:27am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 1:38am, funado wrote:
Today at 12:48am, gitrichordietrying wrote:so Greg....you knew that robert and sheila and the other plaintiffs were deliberately feeding misinformation to the general shareholder population....I guess you are more astute than the rest of us...should have brought it to our attention



Gitrich, I think it'd be jumping to conclusions to immediately accuse anyone of deliberately feeding us misinformation.

What these letters show is that Alan doesn't agree with the way that other plaintiffs are handling things. In short, he wants them to shut up. If we were to sit down in a room with all of the plaintiffs and have them express their opinions, we'd no doubt get seven different perspectives on how everyone is doing. I'm sure that the plaintiffs would say that they were simply trying to help the shareholders by keeping them informed. And that's not a viewpoint that Alan shares. The person who is "correct" in each case probably depends on a lot of factors. Alan might be correct in some cases, and other plaintiffs might be correct in others.

We just aren't close enough to the action to know who is right and who is wrong here. Personally, I'll continue to place my trust in Al and BHollenegg, but that's just my own opinion.

More than anything, it probably goes to show how difficult it is to be a plaintiff, as well as how difficult it must be for Al to keep everyone on the right track. But that's just human nature. If you put any seven people into a pressure cooker for a year or so, you'd find major differences in opinion.

Perhaps Reece and Alan have incompatible personalities, or one or the other, or both, have a creative imagination.

At any rate, this doesn't bother me much, and I don't place too much importance on it. I also agree that it's very old news. I haven't heard of any explosions going on between the plaintiffs for some time. Perhaps it just hasn't surfaced yet. I don't know.

Of course, this is AIMHO.

Funado

Edit: Thanks for your input, Robert. I hadn't seen your post when I wrote the above. I agree with your viewpoint of what should and shouldn't be shared.


Reply:

Thank you Funado,
BHollenegg

**************************

Re: The Buzz Chat 01/03
« Result #2 Today at 3:57am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 3:36am, golden2011-01 wrote:I read the buzz Bob . . . It is unavoidable.

And . . . I believe that I expressed I have no problem with you personally, it is the dates that never come to pass that upset me . . .Let's stay on topic.

Reply:

I have no control in the decision making process. Changes occur...that is why updates exist. You represent a small percentage who do not want to read the scheduled date of the release, yet you expect the majority who do want to know to do without the information?


Thank you,
BHollenegg

******************

attention everyone...need to see this, IMO (Read 2,886 times)
bhollenegg
DIAMOND JEDI WARLORD







Re: attention everyone...need to see this
« Result #1 Today at 4:15am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 4:04am, stockrich wrote:
Bob,

What's are status? Are we still talking "staging areas or packet centers" whatever? Waiting for a 'green light'. Bonney talked about money moving yesterday. He told Remoaz, that if money moved he would know it.
The big questions have always been "how much and when" I'm very satisfied that the 'money in play' is .80 [how much] and the "when" is now. I can appreciate that this all has to come together according to plan.
According to Chucky there was a 'glitch, misunderstanding, or someone messed with us' but Chucky seemed to think it was fixable and the SC directive will hold. I'm hoping we're still in the moment.

What do you think? You were pretty positive over the weekend, so was Al.

How we doin' now?


Stockrich.


Reply:

Hello Stockrich....I just spent the night responding to messages stating they do not want dates and amounts posted. I have to go out of town today. If I receive an update, I will send you a pm.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg



*********************

[travelbugaz]

Dave and All,

I was out of town for medical issues. Sorry for the delay in responding.

These are the facts as I know to date.

Funding for the The CMKX Payments are in place.
First payment packets 80 cents pps enclosed.
Packets released to distribution holding centers of a well known carrier, (security..name is not provided for public dissemination)
Packets are ready for release, awaiting permission.
CMKX is not the only payment distribution.
This is the first distribution packet of more to come.
Attorney Hodges has an appeal ready and will file the appeal to ensure future deliveries are completed satisfactory.
Tightened security in place, including communications.
Attorney Hodges because of his close involvement cannot release details.
Attorney Hodges will not update the Plaintiffs because a Shareholder posted a copy of one of the updates which was marked Private and not for public knowledge. The update had highly sensitive information. As a result, no updates.

What can the Shareholders do?
The amount of funds involved, the amount of entities involved both civilians and governments, the amount of recipients involved, there are some issues and concerns are being addressed. I do not know what the issues are or what it will take to make it copacetic. If I believe harassing those involved, calling my congressman, calling the authorities, hiring more lawyers would release the funds any quicker, I would be the first to advocate this.

When will the CMKX Distribution First Payment Packet arrive at the final destination?
The delivery should have occurred already. Based on this, and the above information, I expect the CMKX Distribution First Payment Packet any time. If I receive any information which I can share I will. I have provided what I know at this point.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

Today at 9:50am est

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=mofo&thread=7953&page=2

[sandi66]

January 6, 2010

Today at 1:42am, tonycmkx wrote:I know you can't say much but at least can you say yes or no to the following question which is very important for our mental attitude for both short term and long term.


WAS THE SUPREME COURT DIRECTIVE IGNORED BY THE DARK SIDE ?


If yes, then I will take a deep breath and calmly wait it out for as long as it take and will be checking the board weekly or bi-weekly instead of daily.

If no, I can still happily keep my emotion high hoping for closure within days if not weeks.

I think we all deserve to know to plan to ease our emotions and expectations.

Thank you.

Tony




I was out of town for medical issues. Sorry for the delay in responding.

These are the facts as I know to date.

Funding for the The CMKX Payments are in place.
First payment packets 80 cents pps enclosed.
Packets released to distribution holding centers of a well known carrier, (security..name is not provided for public dissemination)
Packets are ready for release, awaiting permission.
CMKX is not the only payment distribution.
This is the first distribution packet of more to come.
Attorney Hodges has an appeal ready and will file the appeal to ensure future deliveries are completed satisfactory.
Tightened security in place, including communications.
Attorney Hodges because of his close involvement cannot release details.
Attorney Hodges will not update the Plaintiffs because a Shareholder posted a copy of one of the updates which was marked Private and not for public knowledge. The update had highly sensitive information. As a result, no updates.

What can the Shareholders do?
The amount of funds involved, the amount of entities involved both civilians and governments, the amount of recipients involved, there are some issues and concerns are being addressed. I do not know what the issues are or what it will take to make it copacetic. If I believe harassing those involved, calling my congressman, calling the authorities, hiring more lawyers would release the funds any quicker, I would be the first to advocate this.

When will the CMKX Distribution First Payment Packet arrive at the final destination?
The delivery should have occurred already. Based on this, and the above information, I expect the CMKX Distribution First Payment Packet any time. If I receive any information which I can share I will. I have provided what I know at this point.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg

[sandi66]

January 6, 2011

Re: bob a few business days are over, so I
« Result #5 Today at 12:53pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 12:16pm, vpd wrote:No offense to Bob but he includes his post with the following statement.

"These are the facts as I know to date."

How does he know this as fact? Did he see the packages first hand? If he was "told" thia is where we stand, I would not call it "fact". Too many people use the term "fact" way too liberally IMO



Reply:

The word fact can refer to verified information about past or present circumstances or events which are presented as objective reality. In science, it means a provable concept.[1]

fact (fkt)
n.
1. Knowledge or information based on real occurrences: an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy.

2.
a. Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed: Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact.
b. A real occurrence; an event: had to prove the facts of the case.
c. Something believed to be true or real: a document laced with mistaken facts.
3. A thing that has been done, especially a crime: an accessory before the fact.
4. Law The aspect of a case at law comprising events determined by evidence: The jury made a finding of fact.

Thank you,
BHollenegg

www.thefreedictionary.com/fact

***********************

Re: bob a few business days are over, so I
« Result #4 Today at 1:02pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 11:53am, cheechman wrote:fwiw , called dhl they said they would NOT hold packets for anyone unless ready to ship.


cheechman


reply:

fwiw, you called the wrong carrier.

***************************

Re: bob a few business days are over, so I
« Result #3 Today at 1:18pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 12:58pm, wolfbela wrote:Here's a fact for you..

The Bob H post today spelling out today where the situation is has been forwarded to the Securities commissions that we are working with at this time..

Anything publicly fed to the shareholders is going immediately to these agencies.

J WB

Reply:

Thank you Jerry. Go ahead...if the SEC can help release the funds any quicker this would be great. I trust the SEC in keeping their word more than some who profess they will. The Shareholders will be paid no matter how hard you try...

Thank you,
BHollenegg

************************

Re: bob a few business days are over, so I
« Result #2 Today at 1:21pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 1:06pm, soonerlew wrote:
Today at 1:02pm, BHollenegg wrote:

fwiw, you called the wrong carrier.



Try FedEx and UPS.....

My drivers state they do.


Reply:

Thank you Soonerlew,
BHollenegg

*******************

Today at 1:07pm, MannyFin wrote:
Today at 12:58pm, wolfbela wrote:Here's a fact for you..

The Bob H post today spelling out today where the situation is has been forwarded to the Securities commissions that we are working with at this time..

Anything publicly fed to the shareholders is going immediately to these agencies.

J WB




As sick as I am today, I am not beliveing what I just read? So in essence, you are stopping any more rumors, updates etc from being posted and actually you are telling Bob he is full of shi*!! I totaly disagree that Bob is what you are implying. So let me get this straight, by contacting the CA Bar Asso, what are you actully trying to do? If nothing else, your going to cause a shi*storm in reverse that can backfire on you!!!!!!!!!!!!


Reply:

Thank you Manny. It is a case of, if ones threats can't stop Attorney Hodges from helping the Shareholders, then try to bully anyone who provides information on what is going on. Would it be best if everyone were to run their messages by Wolfbela for approval on what the Shareholders should receive?

All the best,
BHollenegg

***********************

cmkxunofficial.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=userrecentposts&user=bhollenegg

[travelbugaz]

Jttmon and All...thank you for your kind message...very much appreciated.

The information posted today was not an update, but a response to several posts and emails requesting what I know. As far as updates are concern, there is a point where an update cannot be helpful unless it is to say it is done....something you can bank on. It is not my position to do this when the time arrives, this honor belongs Attorney Hodges. He has the patience of a saint in dealing with me and others as he is fighting the likes of hell to get the CMKX Distribution Funds to the Shareholders. From a great warrior who I respect, I pass on Attorney Hodges closing remark in his updates..."Keep the faith"... and I will, as I know you will.


All the best,
BHollenegg

millionaires.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=main&thread=36499&page=1#515200